Cargando…

Autopsy of Adult Patients Deceased in an Academic Hospital: Considerations of Doctors and Next-of-Kin in the Consent Process

INTRODUCTION: Hospital autopsies, vanishing worldwide, need to be requested by clinicians and consented to by next-of-kin. The aim of this prospective observational study was to examine how often and why clinicians do not request an autopsy, and for what reasons next-of-kin allow, or refuse it. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blokker, Britt M., Weustink, Annick C., Hunink, M. G. Myriam, Oosterhuis, J. Wolter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27736974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163811
_version_ 1782459961559744512
author Blokker, Britt M.
Weustink, Annick C.
Hunink, M. G. Myriam
Oosterhuis, J. Wolter
author_facet Blokker, Britt M.
Weustink, Annick C.
Hunink, M. G. Myriam
Oosterhuis, J. Wolter
author_sort Blokker, Britt M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Hospital autopsies, vanishing worldwide, need to be requested by clinicians and consented to by next-of-kin. The aim of this prospective observational study was to examine how often and why clinicians do not request an autopsy, and for what reasons next-of-kin allow, or refuse it. METHODS: Clinicians at the Erasmus University Medical Centre were asked to complete a questionnaire when an adult patient had died. Questionnaires on 1000 consecutive naturally deceased adults were collected. If possible, missing data in the questionnaires were retrieved from the electronic patient record. RESULTS: Data from 958 (96%) questionnaires was available for analysis. In 167/958 (17·4%) cases clinicians did not request an autopsy, and in 641/791 (81·0%) cases next-of-kin did not give consent. The most important reason for both clinicians (51·5%) and next-of-kin (51·0%) to not request or consent to an autopsy was an assumed known cause of death. Their second reason was that the deceased had gone through a long illness (9·6% and 29·5%). The third reason for next-of-kin was mutilation of the deceased’s body by the autopsy procedure (16·1%). Autopsy rates were highest among patients aged 30–39 years, Europeans, suddenly and/or unexpectedly deceased patients, and tissue and/or organ donors. The intensive care and emergency units achieved the highest autopsy rates, and surgical wards the lowest. CONCLUSION: The main reason for not requesting or allowing an autopsy is the assumption that the cause of death is known. This is a dangerous premise, because it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Clinicians should be aware, and communicate with the next of kin, that autopsies not infrequently disclose unexpected findings, which might have changed patient management. Mutilation of the deceased’s body seems a minor consideration of next-of-kin, though how it really affects autopsy rates, should be studied by offering minimally or non-invasive autopsy methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5063372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50633722016-11-04 Autopsy of Adult Patients Deceased in an Academic Hospital: Considerations of Doctors and Next-of-Kin in the Consent Process Blokker, Britt M. Weustink, Annick C. Hunink, M. G. Myriam Oosterhuis, J. Wolter PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: Hospital autopsies, vanishing worldwide, need to be requested by clinicians and consented to by next-of-kin. The aim of this prospective observational study was to examine how often and why clinicians do not request an autopsy, and for what reasons next-of-kin allow, or refuse it. METHODS: Clinicians at the Erasmus University Medical Centre were asked to complete a questionnaire when an adult patient had died. Questionnaires on 1000 consecutive naturally deceased adults were collected. If possible, missing data in the questionnaires were retrieved from the electronic patient record. RESULTS: Data from 958 (96%) questionnaires was available for analysis. In 167/958 (17·4%) cases clinicians did not request an autopsy, and in 641/791 (81·0%) cases next-of-kin did not give consent. The most important reason for both clinicians (51·5%) and next-of-kin (51·0%) to not request or consent to an autopsy was an assumed known cause of death. Their second reason was that the deceased had gone through a long illness (9·6% and 29·5%). The third reason for next-of-kin was mutilation of the deceased’s body by the autopsy procedure (16·1%). Autopsy rates were highest among patients aged 30–39 years, Europeans, suddenly and/or unexpectedly deceased patients, and tissue and/or organ donors. The intensive care and emergency units achieved the highest autopsy rates, and surgical wards the lowest. CONCLUSION: The main reason for not requesting or allowing an autopsy is the assumption that the cause of death is known. This is a dangerous premise, because it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. Clinicians should be aware, and communicate with the next of kin, that autopsies not infrequently disclose unexpected findings, which might have changed patient management. Mutilation of the deceased’s body seems a minor consideration of next-of-kin, though how it really affects autopsy rates, should be studied by offering minimally or non-invasive autopsy methods. Public Library of Science 2016-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5063372/ /pubmed/27736974 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163811 Text en © 2016 Blokker et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blokker, Britt M.
Weustink, Annick C.
Hunink, M. G. Myriam
Oosterhuis, J. Wolter
Autopsy of Adult Patients Deceased in an Academic Hospital: Considerations of Doctors and Next-of-Kin in the Consent Process
title Autopsy of Adult Patients Deceased in an Academic Hospital: Considerations of Doctors and Next-of-Kin in the Consent Process
title_full Autopsy of Adult Patients Deceased in an Academic Hospital: Considerations of Doctors and Next-of-Kin in the Consent Process
title_fullStr Autopsy of Adult Patients Deceased in an Academic Hospital: Considerations of Doctors and Next-of-Kin in the Consent Process
title_full_unstemmed Autopsy of Adult Patients Deceased in an Academic Hospital: Considerations of Doctors and Next-of-Kin in the Consent Process
title_short Autopsy of Adult Patients Deceased in an Academic Hospital: Considerations of Doctors and Next-of-Kin in the Consent Process
title_sort autopsy of adult patients deceased in an academic hospital: considerations of doctors and next-of-kin in the consent process
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27736974
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163811
work_keys_str_mv AT blokkerbrittm autopsyofadultpatientsdeceasedinanacademichospitalconsiderationsofdoctorsandnextofkinintheconsentprocess
AT weustinkannickc autopsyofadultpatientsdeceasedinanacademichospitalconsiderationsofdoctorsandnextofkinintheconsentprocess
AT huninkmgmyriam autopsyofadultpatientsdeceasedinanacademichospitalconsiderationsofdoctorsandnextofkinintheconsentprocess
AT oosterhuisjwolter autopsyofadultpatientsdeceasedinanacademichospitalconsiderationsofdoctorsandnextofkinintheconsentprocess