Cargando…

Comparison of Pre-Attentive Auditory Discrimination at Gross and Fine Difference between Auditory Stimuli

Introduction Mismatch Negativity is a negative component of the event-related potential (ERP) elicited by any discriminable changes in auditory stimulation. Objective The present study aimed to assess pre-attentive auditory discrimination skill with fine and gross difference between auditory stimuli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sanju, Himanshu Kumar, Kumar, Prawin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Publicações Ltda 2015
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27746831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570071
_version_ 1782460022841671680
author Sanju, Himanshu Kumar
Kumar, Prawin
author_facet Sanju, Himanshu Kumar
Kumar, Prawin
author_sort Sanju, Himanshu Kumar
collection PubMed
description Introduction Mismatch Negativity is a negative component of the event-related potential (ERP) elicited by any discriminable changes in auditory stimulation. Objective The present study aimed to assess pre-attentive auditory discrimination skill with fine and gross difference between auditory stimuli. Method Seventeen normal hearing individual participated in the study. To assess pre-attentive auditory discrimination skill with fine difference between auditory stimuli, we recorded mismatch negativity (MMN) with pair of stimuli (pure tones), using /1000 Hz/ and /1010 Hz/ with /1000 Hz/ as frequent stimulus and /1010 Hz/ as infrequent stimulus. Similarly, we used /1000 Hz/ and /1100 Hz/ with /1000 Hz/ as frequent stimulus and /1100 Hz/ as infrequent stimulus to assess pre-attentive auditory discrimination skill with gross difference between auditory stimuli. The study included 17 subjects with informed consent. We analyzed MMN for onset latency, offset latency, peak latency, peak amplitude, and area under the curve parameters. Result Results revealed that MMN was present only in 64% of the individuals in both conditions. Further Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) showed no significant difference in all measures of MMN (onset latency, offset latency, peak latency, peak amplitude, and area under the curve) in both conditions. Conclusion The present study showed similar pre-attentive skills for both conditions: fine (1000 Hz and 1010 Hz) and gross (1000 Hz and 1100 Hz) difference in auditory stimuli at a higher level (endogenous) of the auditory system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5063730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Thieme Publicações Ltda
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50637302016-10-14 Comparison of Pre-Attentive Auditory Discrimination at Gross and Fine Difference between Auditory Stimuli Sanju, Himanshu Kumar Kumar, Prawin Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction Mismatch Negativity is a negative component of the event-related potential (ERP) elicited by any discriminable changes in auditory stimulation. Objective The present study aimed to assess pre-attentive auditory discrimination skill with fine and gross difference between auditory stimuli. Method Seventeen normal hearing individual participated in the study. To assess pre-attentive auditory discrimination skill with fine difference between auditory stimuli, we recorded mismatch negativity (MMN) with pair of stimuli (pure tones), using /1000 Hz/ and /1010 Hz/ with /1000 Hz/ as frequent stimulus and /1010 Hz/ as infrequent stimulus. Similarly, we used /1000 Hz/ and /1100 Hz/ with /1000 Hz/ as frequent stimulus and /1100 Hz/ as infrequent stimulus to assess pre-attentive auditory discrimination skill with gross difference between auditory stimuli. The study included 17 subjects with informed consent. We analyzed MMN for onset latency, offset latency, peak latency, peak amplitude, and area under the curve parameters. Result Results revealed that MMN was present only in 64% of the individuals in both conditions. Further Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) showed no significant difference in all measures of MMN (onset latency, offset latency, peak latency, peak amplitude, and area under the curve) in both conditions. Conclusion The present study showed similar pre-attentive skills for both conditions: fine (1000 Hz and 1010 Hz) and gross (1000 Hz and 1100 Hz) difference in auditory stimuli at a higher level (endogenous) of the auditory system. Thieme Publicações Ltda 2015-12-08 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5063730/ /pubmed/27746831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570071 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Sanju, Himanshu Kumar
Kumar, Prawin
Comparison of Pre-Attentive Auditory Discrimination at Gross and Fine Difference between Auditory Stimuli
title Comparison of Pre-Attentive Auditory Discrimination at Gross and Fine Difference between Auditory Stimuli
title_full Comparison of Pre-Attentive Auditory Discrimination at Gross and Fine Difference between Auditory Stimuli
title_fullStr Comparison of Pre-Attentive Auditory Discrimination at Gross and Fine Difference between Auditory Stimuli
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Pre-Attentive Auditory Discrimination at Gross and Fine Difference between Auditory Stimuli
title_short Comparison of Pre-Attentive Auditory Discrimination at Gross and Fine Difference between Auditory Stimuli
title_sort comparison of pre-attentive auditory discrimination at gross and fine difference between auditory stimuli
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27746831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570071
work_keys_str_mv AT sanjuhimanshukumar comparisonofpreattentiveauditorydiscriminationatgrossandfinedifferencebetweenauditorystimuli
AT kumarprawin comparisonofpreattentiveauditorydiscriminationatgrossandfinedifferencebetweenauditorystimuli