Cargando…

A Review of the External Validity of Clinical Trials with Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure

BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers (BBs) are the mainstay prognostic medication for all stages of chronic heart failure (CHF). There are many classes of BBs, each of which has varying levels of evidence to support its efficacy in CHF. However, most CHF patients have one or more comorbid conditions such as di...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iyngkaran, Pupalan, Toukhsati, Samia R., Thomas, Merlin C., Jelinek, Michael V., Hare, David L., Horowitz, John D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Libertas Academica 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27773994
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S38444
_version_ 1782460042648223744
author Iyngkaran, Pupalan
Toukhsati, Samia R.
Thomas, Merlin C.
Jelinek, Michael V.
Hare, David L.
Horowitz, John D.
author_facet Iyngkaran, Pupalan
Toukhsati, Samia R.
Thomas, Merlin C.
Jelinek, Michael V.
Hare, David L.
Horowitz, John D.
author_sort Iyngkaran, Pupalan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers (BBs) are the mainstay prognostic medication for all stages of chronic heart failure (CHF). There are many classes of BBs, each of which has varying levels of evidence to support its efficacy in CHF. However, most CHF patients have one or more comorbid conditions such as diabetes, renal impairment, and/or atrial fibrillation. Patient enrollment to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often excludes those with certain comorbidities, particularly if the symptoms are severe. Consequently, the extent to which evidence drawn from RCTs is generalizable to CHF patients has not been well described. Clinical guidelines also underrepresent this point by providing generic advice for all patients. The aim of this review is to examine the evidence to support the use of BBs in CHF patients with common comorbid conditions. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and the reference lists of reviews for RCTs, post hoc analyses, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses that report on use of BBs in CHF along with patient demographics and comorbidities. RESULTS: In total, 38 studies from 28 RCTs were identified, which provided data on six BBs against placebo or head to head with another BB agent in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Several studies explored BBs in older patients. Female patients and non-Caucasian race were underrepresented in trials. End points were cardiovascular hospitalization and mortality. Comorbid diabetes, renal impairment, or atrial fibrillation was detailed; however, no reference to disease spectrum or management goals as a focus could be seen in any of the studies. In this sense, enrollment may have limited more severe grades of these comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs provide authoritative information for a spectrum of CHF presentations that support guidelines. RCTs may provide inadequate information for more heterogeneous CHF patient cohorts. Greater Phase IV research may be needed to fill this gap and inform guidelines for a more global patient population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5063839
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Libertas Academica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50638392016-10-21 A Review of the External Validity of Clinical Trials with Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure Iyngkaran, Pupalan Toukhsati, Samia R. Thomas, Merlin C. Jelinek, Michael V. Hare, David L. Horowitz, John D. Clin Med Insights Cardiol Review BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers (BBs) are the mainstay prognostic medication for all stages of chronic heart failure (CHF). There are many classes of BBs, each of which has varying levels of evidence to support its efficacy in CHF. However, most CHF patients have one or more comorbid conditions such as diabetes, renal impairment, and/or atrial fibrillation. Patient enrollment to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) often excludes those with certain comorbidities, particularly if the symptoms are severe. Consequently, the extent to which evidence drawn from RCTs is generalizable to CHF patients has not been well described. Clinical guidelines also underrepresent this point by providing generic advice for all patients. The aim of this review is to examine the evidence to support the use of BBs in CHF patients with common comorbid conditions. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, PubMed, and the reference lists of reviews for RCTs, post hoc analyses, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses that report on use of BBs in CHF along with patient demographics and comorbidities. RESULTS: In total, 38 studies from 28 RCTs were identified, which provided data on six BBs against placebo or head to head with another BB agent in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies. Several studies explored BBs in older patients. Female patients and non-Caucasian race were underrepresented in trials. End points were cardiovascular hospitalization and mortality. Comorbid diabetes, renal impairment, or atrial fibrillation was detailed; however, no reference to disease spectrum or management goals as a focus could be seen in any of the studies. In this sense, enrollment may have limited more severe grades of these comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: RCTs provide authoritative information for a spectrum of CHF presentations that support guidelines. RCTs may provide inadequate information for more heterogeneous CHF patient cohorts. Greater Phase IV research may be needed to fill this gap and inform guidelines for a more global patient population. Libertas Academica 2016-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5063839/ /pubmed/27773994 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S38444 Text en © 2016 the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Review
Iyngkaran, Pupalan
Toukhsati, Samia R.
Thomas, Merlin C.
Jelinek, Michael V.
Hare, David L.
Horowitz, John D.
A Review of the External Validity of Clinical Trials with Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure
title A Review of the External Validity of Clinical Trials with Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure
title_full A Review of the External Validity of Clinical Trials with Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure
title_fullStr A Review of the External Validity of Clinical Trials with Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure
title_full_unstemmed A Review of the External Validity of Clinical Trials with Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure
title_short A Review of the External Validity of Clinical Trials with Beta-Blockers in Heart Failure
title_sort review of the external validity of clinical trials with beta-blockers in heart failure
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5063839/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27773994
http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/CMC.S38444
work_keys_str_mv AT iyngkaranpupalan areviewoftheexternalvalidityofclinicaltrialswithbetablockersinheartfailure
AT toukhsatisamiar areviewoftheexternalvalidityofclinicaltrialswithbetablockersinheartfailure
AT thomasmerlinc areviewoftheexternalvalidityofclinicaltrialswithbetablockersinheartfailure
AT jelinekmichaelv areviewoftheexternalvalidityofclinicaltrialswithbetablockersinheartfailure
AT haredavidl areviewoftheexternalvalidityofclinicaltrialswithbetablockersinheartfailure
AT horowitzjohnd areviewoftheexternalvalidityofclinicaltrialswithbetablockersinheartfailure
AT iyngkaranpupalan reviewoftheexternalvalidityofclinicaltrialswithbetablockersinheartfailure
AT toukhsatisamiar reviewoftheexternalvalidityofclinicaltrialswithbetablockersinheartfailure
AT thomasmerlinc reviewoftheexternalvalidityofclinicaltrialswithbetablockersinheartfailure
AT jelinekmichaelv reviewoftheexternalvalidityofclinicaltrialswithbetablockersinheartfailure
AT haredavidl reviewoftheexternalvalidityofclinicaltrialswithbetablockersinheartfailure
AT horowitzjohnd reviewoftheexternalvalidityofclinicaltrialswithbetablockersinheartfailure