Cargando…

Interendoscopist variability in proximal colon polyp detection is twice higher for serrated polyps than adenomas

AIM: To assess the interendoscopist variability in the detection of colorectal polyps according to their location and histological type. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a regional colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program; 2979 complete colonosco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bretagne, Jean-François, Hamonic, Stéphanie, Piette, Christine, Viel, Jean-François, Bouguen, Guillaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064036/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27784967
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i38.8549
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: To assess the interendoscopist variability in the detection of colorectal polyps according to their location and histological type. METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a regional colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program; 2979 complete colonoscopies from 18 endoscopists were included. Variability in performance between endoscopists for detection of at least one adenoma (A), one proximal adenoma (PA), one distal adenoma (DA), and one proximal serrated polyp (PSP) was assessed by using multilevel logistic regression models. RESULTS: The observed detection rates among the 18 endoscopists ranged from 24.6% to 47.6% (mean = 35.7%) for A, from 19.1% to 39.0% (mean = 29.4%) for DA, from 6.0% to 22.9% (mean = 12.4%) for PA, and from 1.3% to 19.3% (mean = 6.9%) for PSP. After adjusting for patient-level variables (sex, age), the interendoscopist detection rates variability achieved a significant level for A, PA, and PSP but not for DA (P = 0.03, P = 0.02, P = 0.02 and P = 0.08, respectively). This heterogeneity, as measured by the variance partition coefficient, was approximately threefold higher for PA (6.6%) compared with A (2.1%), and twofold higher for PSP (12.3%) compared with PA. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate significant interendoscopist variability for proximal polyp particularly for serrated polyps, but not for distal adenoma detection. These findings contribute to explain the decreased effectiveness of complete colonoscopies at preventing proximal CRCs and the need to carefully assess the proximal colon during scope procedure.