Cargando…
Current debate in the oncologic management of rectal cancer
Despite the considerable amount of research in the field, the management of locally advanced rectal cancer remains a subject to debate. To date, effective treatment centers on surgical resection with the standard approach of total mesorectal resection. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy have been in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795811 http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v8.i10.715 |
_version_ | 1782460076520374272 |
---|---|
author | Millard, Trish Kunk, Paul R Ramsdale, Erika Rahma, Osama E |
author_facet | Millard, Trish Kunk, Paul R Ramsdale, Erika Rahma, Osama E |
author_sort | Millard, Trish |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the considerable amount of research in the field, the management of locally advanced rectal cancer remains a subject to debate. To date, effective treatment centers on surgical resection with the standard approach of total mesorectal resection. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy have been incorporated in order to decrease local and systemic recurrence. While it is accepted that a multimodality treatment regimen is indicated, there remains significant debate for how best to accomplish this in regards to order, dosing, and choice of agents. Preoperative radiation is the standard of care, yet remains debated with the option for chemoradiation, short course radiation, and even ongoing studies looking at the possibility of leaving radiation out altogether. Chemotherapy was traditionally incorporated in the adjuvant setting, but recent reports suggest the possibility of improved efficacy and tolerance when given upfront. In this review, the major studies in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer will be discussed. In addition, future directions will be considered such as the role of immunotherapy and ongoing trials looking at timing of chemotherapy, inclusion of radiation, and non-operative management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5064049 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50640492016-10-29 Current debate in the oncologic management of rectal cancer Millard, Trish Kunk, Paul R Ramsdale, Erika Rahma, Osama E World J Gastrointest Oncol Review Despite the considerable amount of research in the field, the management of locally advanced rectal cancer remains a subject to debate. To date, effective treatment centers on surgical resection with the standard approach of total mesorectal resection. Radiation therapy and chemotherapy have been incorporated in order to decrease local and systemic recurrence. While it is accepted that a multimodality treatment regimen is indicated, there remains significant debate for how best to accomplish this in regards to order, dosing, and choice of agents. Preoperative radiation is the standard of care, yet remains debated with the option for chemoradiation, short course radiation, and even ongoing studies looking at the possibility of leaving radiation out altogether. Chemotherapy was traditionally incorporated in the adjuvant setting, but recent reports suggest the possibility of improved efficacy and tolerance when given upfront. In this review, the major studies in the management of locally advanced rectal cancer will be discussed. In addition, future directions will be considered such as the role of immunotherapy and ongoing trials looking at timing of chemotherapy, inclusion of radiation, and non-operative management. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2016-10-15 2016-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5064049/ /pubmed/27795811 http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v8.i10.715 Text en ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Review Millard, Trish Kunk, Paul R Ramsdale, Erika Rahma, Osama E Current debate in the oncologic management of rectal cancer |
title | Current debate in the oncologic management of rectal cancer |
title_full | Current debate in the oncologic management of rectal cancer |
title_fullStr | Current debate in the oncologic management of rectal cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Current debate in the oncologic management of rectal cancer |
title_short | Current debate in the oncologic management of rectal cancer |
title_sort | current debate in the oncologic management of rectal cancer |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064049/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795811 http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v8.i10.715 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millardtrish currentdebateintheoncologicmanagementofrectalcancer AT kunkpaulr currentdebateintheoncologicmanagementofrectalcancer AT ramsdaleerika currentdebateintheoncologicmanagementofrectalcancer AT rahmaosamae currentdebateintheoncologicmanagementofrectalcancer |