Cargando…

Concentration-Dependent Synergy and Antagonism of Linezolid and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Childhood Tuberculosis: The Dynamic Duo

Background. No treatment regimens have been specifically designed for children, in whom tuberculosis is predominantly intracellular. Given their activity as monotherapy and their ability to penetrate many diseased anatomic sites that characterize disseminated tuberculosis, linezolid and moxifloxacin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Deshpande, Devyani, Srivastava, Shashikant, Nuermberger, Eric, Pasipanodya, Jotam G., Swaminathan, Soumya, Gumbo, Tawanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27742639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw473
_version_ 1782460099740041216
author Deshpande, Devyani
Srivastava, Shashikant
Nuermberger, Eric
Pasipanodya, Jotam G.
Swaminathan, Soumya
Gumbo, Tawanda
author_facet Deshpande, Devyani
Srivastava, Shashikant
Nuermberger, Eric
Pasipanodya, Jotam G.
Swaminathan, Soumya
Gumbo, Tawanda
author_sort Deshpande, Devyani
collection PubMed
description Background. No treatment regimens have been specifically designed for children, in whom tuberculosis is predominantly intracellular. Given their activity as monotherapy and their ability to penetrate many diseased anatomic sites that characterize disseminated tuberculosis, linezolid and moxifloxacin could be combined to form a regimen for this need. Methods. We examined microbial kill of intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) by the combination of linezolid and moxifloxacin multiple exposures in a 7-by-7 mathematical matrix. We then used the hollow fiber system (HFS) model of intracellular tuberculosis to identify optimal dose schedules and exposures of moxifloxacin and linezolid in combination. We mimicked pediatric half-lives and concentrations achieved by each drug. We sampled the peripheral compartment on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 for Mtb quantification, and compared the slope of microbial kill of Mtb by these regimens to the standard regimen of isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide, based on exponential decline regression. Results. The full exposure-response surface identified linezolid-moxifloxacin zones of synergy, antagonism, and additivity. A regimen based on each of these zones was then used in the HFS model, with observed half-lives of 4.08 ± 0.66 for linezolid and 3.80 ± 1.34 hours for moxifloxacin. The kill rate constant was 0.060 ± 0.012 per day with the moxifloxacin-linezolid regimen in the additivity zone vs 0.083 ± 0.011 per day with standard therapy, translating to a bacterial burden half-life of 11.52 days vs 8.53 days, respectively. Conclusions. We identified doses and dose schedules of a linezolid and moxifloxacin backbone regimen that could be highly efficacious in disseminated tuberculosis in children.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5064154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50641542016-10-17 Concentration-Dependent Synergy and Antagonism of Linezolid and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Childhood Tuberculosis: The Dynamic Duo Deshpande, Devyani Srivastava, Shashikant Nuermberger, Eric Pasipanodya, Jotam G. Swaminathan, Soumya Gumbo, Tawanda Clin Infect Dis A Development Paradigm for Novel Combination Regimens for Multidrug-Resistant and Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis in Children: Flame for Work and Play Background. No treatment regimens have been specifically designed for children, in whom tuberculosis is predominantly intracellular. Given their activity as monotherapy and their ability to penetrate many diseased anatomic sites that characterize disseminated tuberculosis, linezolid and moxifloxacin could be combined to form a regimen for this need. Methods. We examined microbial kill of intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) by the combination of linezolid and moxifloxacin multiple exposures in a 7-by-7 mathematical matrix. We then used the hollow fiber system (HFS) model of intracellular tuberculosis to identify optimal dose schedules and exposures of moxifloxacin and linezolid in combination. We mimicked pediatric half-lives and concentrations achieved by each drug. We sampled the peripheral compartment on days 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 for Mtb quantification, and compared the slope of microbial kill of Mtb by these regimens to the standard regimen of isoniazid, rifampin, and pyrazinamide, based on exponential decline regression. Results. The full exposure-response surface identified linezolid-moxifloxacin zones of synergy, antagonism, and additivity. A regimen based on each of these zones was then used in the HFS model, with observed half-lives of 4.08 ± 0.66 for linezolid and 3.80 ± 1.34 hours for moxifloxacin. The kill rate constant was 0.060 ± 0.012 per day with the moxifloxacin-linezolid regimen in the additivity zone vs 0.083 ± 0.011 per day with standard therapy, translating to a bacterial burden half-life of 11.52 days vs 8.53 days, respectively. Conclusions. We identified doses and dose schedules of a linezolid and moxifloxacin backbone regimen that could be highly efficacious in disseminated tuberculosis in children. Oxford University Press 2016-11-01 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5064154/ /pubmed/27742639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw473 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle A Development Paradigm for Novel Combination Regimens for Multidrug-Resistant and Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis in Children: Flame for Work and Play
Deshpande, Devyani
Srivastava, Shashikant
Nuermberger, Eric
Pasipanodya, Jotam G.
Swaminathan, Soumya
Gumbo, Tawanda
Concentration-Dependent Synergy and Antagonism of Linezolid and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Childhood Tuberculosis: The Dynamic Duo
title Concentration-Dependent Synergy and Antagonism of Linezolid and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Childhood Tuberculosis: The Dynamic Duo
title_full Concentration-Dependent Synergy and Antagonism of Linezolid and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Childhood Tuberculosis: The Dynamic Duo
title_fullStr Concentration-Dependent Synergy and Antagonism of Linezolid and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Childhood Tuberculosis: The Dynamic Duo
title_full_unstemmed Concentration-Dependent Synergy and Antagonism of Linezolid and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Childhood Tuberculosis: The Dynamic Duo
title_short Concentration-Dependent Synergy and Antagonism of Linezolid and Moxifloxacin in the Treatment of Childhood Tuberculosis: The Dynamic Duo
title_sort concentration-dependent synergy and antagonism of linezolid and moxifloxacin in the treatment of childhood tuberculosis: the dynamic duo
topic A Development Paradigm for Novel Combination Regimens for Multidrug-Resistant and Drug-Susceptible Tuberculosis in Children: Flame for Work and Play
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27742639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw473
work_keys_str_mv AT deshpandedevyani concentrationdependentsynergyandantagonismoflinezolidandmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofchildhoodtuberculosisthedynamicduo
AT srivastavashashikant concentrationdependentsynergyandantagonismoflinezolidandmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofchildhoodtuberculosisthedynamicduo
AT nuermbergereric concentrationdependentsynergyandantagonismoflinezolidandmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofchildhoodtuberculosisthedynamicduo
AT pasipanodyajotamg concentrationdependentsynergyandantagonismoflinezolidandmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofchildhoodtuberculosisthedynamicduo
AT swaminathansoumya concentrationdependentsynergyandantagonismoflinezolidandmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofchildhoodtuberculosisthedynamicduo
AT gumbotawanda concentrationdependentsynergyandantagonismoflinezolidandmoxifloxacininthetreatmentofchildhoodtuberculosisthedynamicduo