Cargando…
Reduced port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is safe and feasible in terms of short-term outcomes: comparative study with conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery was previously accepted as an alternative surgical option in treatment for colorectal cancer. Nowadays, single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is introduced as a method to maximize advantages of minimally invasive surgery. However, SPLS has several limitations compared...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Surgical Society
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27757397 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.91.4.195 |
_version_ | 1782460113055907840 |
---|---|
author | Song, Ju Myung Kim, Ji Hoon Lee, Yoon Suk Kim, Ho Young Lee, In Kyu Oh, Seung Teak Kim, Jun Gi |
author_facet | Song, Ju Myung Kim, Ji Hoon Lee, Yoon Suk Kim, Ho Young Lee, In Kyu Oh, Seung Teak Kim, Jun Gi |
author_sort | Song, Ju Myung |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery was previously accepted as an alternative surgical option in treatment for colorectal cancer. Nowadays, single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is introduced as a method to maximize advantages of minimally invasive surgery. However, SPLS has several limitations compared to conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (CMLS). To overcome those limitations of SPLS, reduced port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) was introduced. This study aimed at evaluating the short-term outcomes of RPLS. METHODS: Patients who underwent CMLS and RPLS of colon cancer between August 2011 and December 2013 were included in this study. Short-term clinical and pathological outcome were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent RPLS and 217 patients underwent CMLS. Shorter operation time, less blood loss, and faster bowel movement were shown in RPLS group in this study. In terms of postoperative pain, numeric rating scale (NRS) of RPLS was lower than that of CMLS. Significant differences were shown in terms of tumor size, harvested lymph node, perineural invasion, and pathological stage. No significant differences were confirmed in terms of other surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this study, RPLS was technically feasible and safe. Especially in terms of postoperative pain, RPLS was comparable to CMLS. RPLS may be a feasible alternative option in selected patients with colon cancer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5064230 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Korean Surgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50642302016-10-18 Reduced port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is safe and feasible in terms of short-term outcomes: comparative study with conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery Song, Ju Myung Kim, Ji Hoon Lee, Yoon Suk Kim, Ho Young Lee, In Kyu Oh, Seung Teak Kim, Jun Gi Ann Surg Treat Res Original Article PURPOSE: Laparoscopic surgery was previously accepted as an alternative surgical option in treatment for colorectal cancer. Nowadays, single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) is introduced as a method to maximize advantages of minimally invasive surgery. However, SPLS has several limitations compared to conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (CMLS). To overcome those limitations of SPLS, reduced port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) was introduced. This study aimed at evaluating the short-term outcomes of RPLS. METHODS: Patients who underwent CMLS and RPLS of colon cancer between August 2011 and December 2013 were included in this study. Short-term clinical and pathological outcome were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients underwent RPLS and 217 patients underwent CMLS. Shorter operation time, less blood loss, and faster bowel movement were shown in RPLS group in this study. In terms of postoperative pain, numeric rating scale (NRS) of RPLS was lower than that of CMLS. Significant differences were shown in terms of tumor size, harvested lymph node, perineural invasion, and pathological stage. No significant differences were confirmed in terms of other surgical outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this study, RPLS was technically feasible and safe. Especially in terms of postoperative pain, RPLS was comparable to CMLS. RPLS may be a feasible alternative option in selected patients with colon cancer. The Korean Surgical Society 2016-10 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5064230/ /pubmed/27757397 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.91.4.195 Text en Copyright © 2016, the Korean Surgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research is an Open Access Journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Song, Ju Myung Kim, Ji Hoon Lee, Yoon Suk Kim, Ho Young Lee, In Kyu Oh, Seung Teak Kim, Jun Gi Reduced port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is safe and feasible in terms of short-term outcomes: comparative study with conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery |
title | Reduced port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is safe and feasible in terms of short-term outcomes: comparative study with conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery |
title_full | Reduced port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is safe and feasible in terms of short-term outcomes: comparative study with conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery |
title_fullStr | Reduced port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is safe and feasible in terms of short-term outcomes: comparative study with conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Reduced port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is safe and feasible in terms of short-term outcomes: comparative study with conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery |
title_short | Reduced port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is safe and feasible in terms of short-term outcomes: comparative study with conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery |
title_sort | reduced port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer is safe and feasible in terms of short-term outcomes: comparative study with conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064230/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27757397 http://dx.doi.org/10.4174/astr.2016.91.4.195 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songjumyung reducedportlaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncancerissafeandfeasibleintermsofshorttermoutcomescomparativestudywithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgery AT kimjihoon reducedportlaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncancerissafeandfeasibleintermsofshorttermoutcomescomparativestudywithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgery AT leeyoonsuk reducedportlaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncancerissafeandfeasibleintermsofshorttermoutcomescomparativestudywithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgery AT kimhoyoung reducedportlaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncancerissafeandfeasibleintermsofshorttermoutcomescomparativestudywithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgery AT leeinkyu reducedportlaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncancerissafeandfeasibleintermsofshorttermoutcomescomparativestudywithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgery AT ohseungteak reducedportlaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncancerissafeandfeasibleintermsofshorttermoutcomescomparativestudywithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgery AT kimjungi reducedportlaparoscopicsurgeryforcoloncancerissafeandfeasibleintermsofshorttermoutcomescomparativestudywithconventionalmultiportlaparoscopicsurgery |