Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical accuracy of the IONA® test for aneuploidy screening. METHODS: This was a multicenter blinded study in which plasma samples from pregnant women at increased risk of trisomy 21 underwent cell‐free DNA analysis utilizing the IONA test. For each sample, the IONA softw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papageorghiou, A. T., Khalil, A., Forman, M., Hulme, R., Mazey, R., Mousa, H. A., Johnstone, E. D., McKelvey, A., Cohen, K. E., Risley, M., Denman, W., Kelly, B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26493543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.15791
_version_ 1782460196478517248
author Papageorghiou, A. T.
Khalil, A.
Forman, M.
Hulme, R.
Mazey, R.
Mousa, H. A.
Johnstone, E. D.
McKelvey, A.
Cohen, K. E.
Risley, M.
Denman, W.
Kelly, B.
author_facet Papageorghiou, A. T.
Khalil, A.
Forman, M.
Hulme, R.
Mazey, R.
Mousa, H. A.
Johnstone, E. D.
McKelvey, A.
Cohen, K. E.
Risley, M.
Denman, W.
Kelly, B.
author_sort Papageorghiou, A. T.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical accuracy of the IONA® test for aneuploidy screening. METHODS: This was a multicenter blinded study in which plasma samples from pregnant women at increased risk of trisomy 21 underwent cell‐free DNA analysis utilizing the IONA test. For each sample, the IONA software generated a likelihood ratio and a maternal age‐adjusted probability risk score for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. All results from the IONA test were compared against accepted diagnostic karyotyping. RESULTS: A total of 442 maternal samples were obtained, of which 437 had test results available for analysis and assessment of clinical accuracy. The IONA test had a detection rate of 100% for trisomies 21 (n = 43; 95% CI, 87.98–100%), 18 (n = 10; 95% CI, 58.72–100%) and 13 (n = 5; 95% CI, 35.88–100%) with cut‐offs applied to likelihood ratio (cut‐off > 1 considered high risk for trisomy) and probability risk score incorporating adjustment for maternal age (cut‐off ≥ 1/150 considered high risk for trisomy). The false‐positive rate (FPR) was 0% for trisomies 18 and 13 with both analysis outputs. For trisomy 21, a FPR of 0.3% was observed for the likelihood ratio, but became 0% with adjustment for maternal age. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the IONA test is suitable for trisomy screening in a high‐risk screening population. The result‐interpretation feature of the IONA software should facilitate wider implementation, particularly in local laboratories, and should be a useful addition to the current screening methods for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5064629
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50646292016-10-19 Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 Papageorghiou, A. T. Khalil, A. Forman, M. Hulme, R. Mazey, R. Mousa, H. A. Johnstone, E. D. McKelvey, A. Cohen, K. E. Risley, M. Denman, W. Kelly, B. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Original Papers OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical accuracy of the IONA® test for aneuploidy screening. METHODS: This was a multicenter blinded study in which plasma samples from pregnant women at increased risk of trisomy 21 underwent cell‐free DNA analysis utilizing the IONA test. For each sample, the IONA software generated a likelihood ratio and a maternal age‐adjusted probability risk score for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. All results from the IONA test were compared against accepted diagnostic karyotyping. RESULTS: A total of 442 maternal samples were obtained, of which 437 had test results available for analysis and assessment of clinical accuracy. The IONA test had a detection rate of 100% for trisomies 21 (n = 43; 95% CI, 87.98–100%), 18 (n = 10; 95% CI, 58.72–100%) and 13 (n = 5; 95% CI, 35.88–100%) with cut‐offs applied to likelihood ratio (cut‐off > 1 considered high risk for trisomy) and probability risk score incorporating adjustment for maternal age (cut‐off ≥ 1/150 considered high risk for trisomy). The false‐positive rate (FPR) was 0% for trisomies 18 and 13 with both analysis outputs. For trisomy 21, a FPR of 0.3% was observed for the likelihood ratio, but became 0% with adjustment for maternal age. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the IONA test is suitable for trisomy screening in a high‐risk screening population. The result‐interpretation feature of the IONA software should facilitate wider implementation, particularly in local laboratories, and should be a useful addition to the current screening methods for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-12-28 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5064629/ /pubmed/26493543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.15791 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Papageorghiou, A. T.
Khalil, A.
Forman, M.
Hulme, R.
Mazey, R.
Mousa, H. A.
Johnstone, E. D.
McKelvey, A.
Cohen, K. E.
Risley, M.
Denman, W.
Kelly, B.
Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13
title Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13
title_full Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13
title_short Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13
title_sort clinical evaluation of the iona test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064629/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26493543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.15791
work_keys_str_mv AT papageorghiouat clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13
AT khalila clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13
AT formanm clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13
AT hulmer clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13
AT mazeyr clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13
AT mousaha clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13
AT johnstoneed clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13
AT mckelveya clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13
AT cohenke clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13
AT risleym clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13
AT denmanw clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13
AT kellyb clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13