Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical accuracy of the IONA® test for aneuploidy screening. METHODS: This was a multicenter blinded study in which plasma samples from pregnant women at increased risk of trisomy 21 underwent cell‐free DNA analysis utilizing the IONA test. For each sample, the IONA softw...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26493543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.15791 |
_version_ | 1782460196478517248 |
---|---|
author | Papageorghiou, A. T. Khalil, A. Forman, M. Hulme, R. Mazey, R. Mousa, H. A. Johnstone, E. D. McKelvey, A. Cohen, K. E. Risley, M. Denman, W. Kelly, B. |
author_facet | Papageorghiou, A. T. Khalil, A. Forman, M. Hulme, R. Mazey, R. Mousa, H. A. Johnstone, E. D. McKelvey, A. Cohen, K. E. Risley, M. Denman, W. Kelly, B. |
author_sort | Papageorghiou, A. T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical accuracy of the IONA® test for aneuploidy screening. METHODS: This was a multicenter blinded study in which plasma samples from pregnant women at increased risk of trisomy 21 underwent cell‐free DNA analysis utilizing the IONA test. For each sample, the IONA software generated a likelihood ratio and a maternal age‐adjusted probability risk score for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. All results from the IONA test were compared against accepted diagnostic karyotyping. RESULTS: A total of 442 maternal samples were obtained, of which 437 had test results available for analysis and assessment of clinical accuracy. The IONA test had a detection rate of 100% for trisomies 21 (n = 43; 95% CI, 87.98–100%), 18 (n = 10; 95% CI, 58.72–100%) and 13 (n = 5; 95% CI, 35.88–100%) with cut‐offs applied to likelihood ratio (cut‐off > 1 considered high risk for trisomy) and probability risk score incorporating adjustment for maternal age (cut‐off ≥ 1/150 considered high risk for trisomy). The false‐positive rate (FPR) was 0% for trisomies 18 and 13 with both analysis outputs. For trisomy 21, a FPR of 0.3% was observed for the likelihood ratio, but became 0% with adjustment for maternal age. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the IONA test is suitable for trisomy screening in a high‐risk screening population. The result‐interpretation feature of the IONA software should facilitate wider implementation, particularly in local laboratories, and should be a useful addition to the current screening methods for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5064629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50646292016-10-19 Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 Papageorghiou, A. T. Khalil, A. Forman, M. Hulme, R. Mazey, R. Mousa, H. A. Johnstone, E. D. McKelvey, A. Cohen, K. E. Risley, M. Denman, W. Kelly, B. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Original Papers OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical accuracy of the IONA® test for aneuploidy screening. METHODS: This was a multicenter blinded study in which plasma samples from pregnant women at increased risk of trisomy 21 underwent cell‐free DNA analysis utilizing the IONA test. For each sample, the IONA software generated a likelihood ratio and a maternal age‐adjusted probability risk score for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. All results from the IONA test were compared against accepted diagnostic karyotyping. RESULTS: A total of 442 maternal samples were obtained, of which 437 had test results available for analysis and assessment of clinical accuracy. The IONA test had a detection rate of 100% for trisomies 21 (n = 43; 95% CI, 87.98–100%), 18 (n = 10; 95% CI, 58.72–100%) and 13 (n = 5; 95% CI, 35.88–100%) with cut‐offs applied to likelihood ratio (cut‐off > 1 considered high risk for trisomy) and probability risk score incorporating adjustment for maternal age (cut‐off ≥ 1/150 considered high risk for trisomy). The false‐positive rate (FPR) was 0% for trisomies 18 and 13 with both analysis outputs. For trisomy 21, a FPR of 0.3% was observed for the likelihood ratio, but became 0% with adjustment for maternal age. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the IONA test is suitable for trisomy screening in a high‐risk screening population. The result‐interpretation feature of the IONA software should facilitate wider implementation, particularly in local laboratories, and should be a useful addition to the current screening methods for trisomies 21, 18 and 13. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-12-28 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5064629/ /pubmed/26493543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.15791 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Papers Papageorghiou, A. T. Khalil, A. Forman, M. Hulme, R. Mazey, R. Mousa, H. A. Johnstone, E. D. McKelvey, A. Cohen, K. E. Risley, M. Denman, W. Kelly, B. Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 |
title | Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 |
title_full | Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 |
title_fullStr | Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 |
title_short | Clinical evaluation of the IONA test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of the iona test: a non‐invasive prenatal screening test for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 |
topic | Original Papers |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26493543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.15791 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT papageorghiouat clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13 AT khalila clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13 AT formanm clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13 AT hulmer clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13 AT mazeyr clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13 AT mousaha clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13 AT johnstoneed clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13 AT mckelveya clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13 AT cohenke clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13 AT risleym clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13 AT denmanw clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13 AT kellyb clinicalevaluationoftheionatestanoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtestfortrisomies2118and13 |