Cargando…
A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: With the availability of modern workstations and heightened awareness on the environmental effects of waste anaesthesia gases, anaesthesiologists worldwide are practicing low flow anaesthesia (LFA). Although LFA is being practiced in India, hard evidence on the current practice...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27761039 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.191692 |
_version_ | 1782460212359200768 |
---|---|
author | Amma, Rajasree Omanakutty Ravindran, Subha Koshy, Rachel Cherian Jagathnath Krishna, KM |
author_facet | Amma, Rajasree Omanakutty Ravindran, Subha Koshy, Rachel Cherian Jagathnath Krishna, KM |
author_sort | Amma, Rajasree Omanakutty |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: With the availability of modern workstations and heightened awareness on the environmental effects of waste anaesthesia gases, anaesthesiologists worldwide are practicing low flow anaesthesia (LFA). Although LFA is being practiced in India, hard evidence on the current practice of the same from anaesthesiologists practicing in India is lacking and hence, we conducted this survey. METHODS: A questionnaire containing 16 questions was distributed among a subgroup of anaesthesiologists who attended the 2014 National Conference of Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists. The filled-in questionnaires were computed and analysed with SPSS version 11. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 82%. About 73% of the respondents practiced LFA routinely, with 65% having workstations. Most of the anaesthesiologists used fresh gas flows <1.5 L/min with 45.1% using O(2) concentrations at a range of 30–40%. ETCO(2) monitoring was used routinely by most whereas use of agent analysers and bispectral index monitoring were restricted. The availability of scavenging system was also limited to only 33.5%. Majority preferred N(2) O as carrier gas and sevoflurane as volatile agent of their choice. CONCLUSION: Our survey revealed that practice of LFA in India has numerous lacunae. Provision of better monitoring facilities, workstations as well as awareness regarding the environmental issues of waste anaesthetic gases need to be addressed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5064700 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50647002016-10-19 A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India Amma, Rajasree Omanakutty Ravindran, Subha Koshy, Rachel Cherian Jagathnath Krishna, KM Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: With the availability of modern workstations and heightened awareness on the environmental effects of waste anaesthesia gases, anaesthesiologists worldwide are practicing low flow anaesthesia (LFA). Although LFA is being practiced in India, hard evidence on the current practice of the same from anaesthesiologists practicing in India is lacking and hence, we conducted this survey. METHODS: A questionnaire containing 16 questions was distributed among a subgroup of anaesthesiologists who attended the 2014 National Conference of Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists. The filled-in questionnaires were computed and analysed with SPSS version 11. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 82%. About 73% of the respondents practiced LFA routinely, with 65% having workstations. Most of the anaesthesiologists used fresh gas flows <1.5 L/min with 45.1% using O(2) concentrations at a range of 30–40%. ETCO(2) monitoring was used routinely by most whereas use of agent analysers and bispectral index monitoring were restricted. The availability of scavenging system was also limited to only 33.5%. Majority preferred N(2) O as carrier gas and sevoflurane as volatile agent of their choice. CONCLUSION: Our survey revealed that practice of LFA in India has numerous lacunae. Provision of better monitoring facilities, workstations as well as awareness regarding the environmental issues of waste anaesthetic gases need to be addressed. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5064700/ /pubmed/27761039 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.191692 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Amma, Rajasree Omanakutty Ravindran, Subha Koshy, Rachel Cherian Jagathnath Krishna, KM A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India |
title | A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India |
title_full | A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India |
title_fullStr | A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India |
title_full_unstemmed | A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India |
title_short | A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India |
title_sort | survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of india |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064700/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27761039 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.191692 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ammarajasreeomanakutty asurveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia AT ravindransubha asurveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia AT koshyrachelcherian asurveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia AT jagathnathkrishnakm asurveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia AT ammarajasreeomanakutty surveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia AT ravindransubha surveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia AT koshyrachelcherian surveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia AT jagathnathkrishnakm surveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia |