Cargando…

A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: With the availability of modern workstations and heightened awareness on the environmental effects of waste anaesthesia gases, anaesthesiologists worldwide are practicing low flow anaesthesia (LFA). Although LFA is being practiced in India, hard evidence on the current practice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amma, Rajasree Omanakutty, Ravindran, Subha, Koshy, Rachel Cherian, Jagathnath Krishna, KM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27761039
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.191692
_version_ 1782460212359200768
author Amma, Rajasree Omanakutty
Ravindran, Subha
Koshy, Rachel Cherian
Jagathnath Krishna, KM
author_facet Amma, Rajasree Omanakutty
Ravindran, Subha
Koshy, Rachel Cherian
Jagathnath Krishna, KM
author_sort Amma, Rajasree Omanakutty
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: With the availability of modern workstations and heightened awareness on the environmental effects of waste anaesthesia gases, anaesthesiologists worldwide are practicing low flow anaesthesia (LFA). Although LFA is being practiced in India, hard evidence on the current practice of the same from anaesthesiologists practicing in India is lacking and hence, we conducted this survey. METHODS: A questionnaire containing 16 questions was distributed among a subgroup of anaesthesiologists who attended the 2014 National Conference of Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists. The filled-in questionnaires were computed and analysed with SPSS version 11. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 82%. About 73% of the respondents practiced LFA routinely, with 65% having workstations. Most of the anaesthesiologists used fresh gas flows <1.5 L/min with 45.1% using O(2) concentrations at a range of 30–40%. ETCO(2) monitoring was used routinely by most whereas use of agent analysers and bispectral index monitoring were restricted. The availability of scavenging system was also limited to only 33.5%. Majority preferred N(2) O as carrier gas and sevoflurane as volatile agent of their choice. CONCLUSION: Our survey revealed that practice of LFA in India has numerous lacunae. Provision of better monitoring facilities, workstations as well as awareness regarding the environmental issues of waste anaesthetic gases need to be addressed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5064700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50647002016-10-19 A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India Amma, Rajasree Omanakutty Ravindran, Subha Koshy, Rachel Cherian Jagathnath Krishna, KM Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: With the availability of modern workstations and heightened awareness on the environmental effects of waste anaesthesia gases, anaesthesiologists worldwide are practicing low flow anaesthesia (LFA). Although LFA is being practiced in India, hard evidence on the current practice of the same from anaesthesiologists practicing in India is lacking and hence, we conducted this survey. METHODS: A questionnaire containing 16 questions was distributed among a subgroup of anaesthesiologists who attended the 2014 National Conference of Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists. The filled-in questionnaires were computed and analysed with SPSS version 11. RESULTS: The response rate to the survey was 82%. About 73% of the respondents practiced LFA routinely, with 65% having workstations. Most of the anaesthesiologists used fresh gas flows <1.5 L/min with 45.1% using O(2) concentrations at a range of 30–40%. ETCO(2) monitoring was used routinely by most whereas use of agent analysers and bispectral index monitoring were restricted. The availability of scavenging system was also limited to only 33.5%. Majority preferred N(2) O as carrier gas and sevoflurane as volatile agent of their choice. CONCLUSION: Our survey revealed that practice of LFA in India has numerous lacunae. Provision of better monitoring facilities, workstations as well as awareness regarding the environmental issues of waste anaesthetic gases need to be addressed. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5064700/ /pubmed/27761039 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.191692 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Amma, Rajasree Omanakutty
Ravindran, Subha
Koshy, Rachel Cherian
Jagathnath Krishna, KM
A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India
title A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India
title_full A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India
title_fullStr A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India
title_full_unstemmed A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India
title_short A survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of India
title_sort survey on the use of low flow anaesthesia and the choice of inhalational anaesthetic agents among anaesthesiologists of india
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27761039
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.191692
work_keys_str_mv AT ammarajasreeomanakutty asurveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia
AT ravindransubha asurveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia
AT koshyrachelcherian asurveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia
AT jagathnathkrishnakm asurveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia
AT ammarajasreeomanakutty surveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia
AT ravindransubha surveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia
AT koshyrachelcherian surveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia
AT jagathnathkrishnakm surveyontheuseoflowflowanaesthesiaandthechoiceofinhalationalanaestheticagentsamonganaesthesiologistsofindia