Cargando…
Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial
OBJECTIVES: The Automatic Stimulation Mode (AutoStim) feature of the Model 106 Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy System stimulates the left vagus nerve on detecting tachycardia. This study evaluates performance, safety of the AutoStim feature during a 3‐5‐day Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) stay...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26663671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12376 |
_version_ | 1782460219886927872 |
---|---|
author | Fisher, Robert S. Afra, Pegah Macken, Micheal Minecan, Daniela N. Bagić, Anto Benbadis, Selim R. Helmers, Sandra L. Sinha, Saurabh R. Slater, Jeremy Treiman, David Begnaud, Jason Raman, Pradheep Najimipour, Bita |
author_facet | Fisher, Robert S. Afra, Pegah Macken, Micheal Minecan, Daniela N. Bagić, Anto Benbadis, Selim R. Helmers, Sandra L. Sinha, Saurabh R. Slater, Jeremy Treiman, David Begnaud, Jason Raman, Pradheep Najimipour, Bita |
author_sort | Fisher, Robert S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The Automatic Stimulation Mode (AutoStim) feature of the Model 106 Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy System stimulates the left vagus nerve on detecting tachycardia. This study evaluates performance, safety of the AutoStim feature during a 3‐5‐day Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) stay and long‐ term clinical outcomes of the device stimulating in all modes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The E‐37 protocol (NCT01846741) was a prospective, unblinded, U.S. multisite study of the AspireSR(®) in subjects with drug‐resistant partial onset seizures and history of ictal tachycardia. VNS Normal and Magnet Modes stimulation were present at all times except during the EMU stay. Outpatient visits at 3, 6, and 12 months tracked seizure frequency, severity, quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty implanted subjects (ages 21–69) experienced 89 seizures in the EMU. 28/38 (73.7%) of complex partial and secondarily generalized seizures exhibited ≥20% increase in heart rate change. 31/89 (34.8%) of seizures were treated by Automatic Stimulation on detection; 19/31 (61.3%) seizures ended during the stimulation with a median time from stimulation onset to seizure end of 35 sec. Mean duty cycle at six‐months increased from 11% to 16%. At 12 months, quality of life and seizure severity scores improved, and responder rate was 50%. Common adverse events were dysphonia (n = 7), convulsion (n = 6), and oropharyngeal pain (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: The Model 106 performed as intended in the study population, was well tolerated and associated with clinical improvement from baseline. The study design did not allow determination of which factors were responsible for improvements. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5064739 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50647392016-10-19 Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial Fisher, Robert S. Afra, Pegah Macken, Micheal Minecan, Daniela N. Bagić, Anto Benbadis, Selim R. Helmers, Sandra L. Sinha, Saurabh R. Slater, Jeremy Treiman, David Begnaud, Jason Raman, Pradheep Najimipour, Bita Neuromodulation Peripheral Nerve Stimulation OBJECTIVES: The Automatic Stimulation Mode (AutoStim) feature of the Model 106 Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy System stimulates the left vagus nerve on detecting tachycardia. This study evaluates performance, safety of the AutoStim feature during a 3‐5‐day Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) stay and long‐ term clinical outcomes of the device stimulating in all modes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The E‐37 protocol (NCT01846741) was a prospective, unblinded, U.S. multisite study of the AspireSR(®) in subjects with drug‐resistant partial onset seizures and history of ictal tachycardia. VNS Normal and Magnet Modes stimulation were present at all times except during the EMU stay. Outpatient visits at 3, 6, and 12 months tracked seizure frequency, severity, quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty implanted subjects (ages 21–69) experienced 89 seizures in the EMU. 28/38 (73.7%) of complex partial and secondarily generalized seizures exhibited ≥20% increase in heart rate change. 31/89 (34.8%) of seizures were treated by Automatic Stimulation on detection; 19/31 (61.3%) seizures ended during the stimulation with a median time from stimulation onset to seizure end of 35 sec. Mean duty cycle at six‐months increased from 11% to 16%. At 12 months, quality of life and seizure severity scores improved, and responder rate was 50%. Common adverse events were dysphonia (n = 7), convulsion (n = 6), and oropharyngeal pain (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: The Model 106 performed as intended in the study population, was well tolerated and associated with clinical improvement from baseline. The study design did not allow determination of which factors were responsible for improvements. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-12-13 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5064739/ /pubmed/26663671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12376 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Neuromodulation Society This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Fisher, Robert S. Afra, Pegah Macken, Micheal Minecan, Daniela N. Bagić, Anto Benbadis, Selim R. Helmers, Sandra L. Sinha, Saurabh R. Slater, Jeremy Treiman, David Begnaud, Jason Raman, Pradheep Najimipour, Bita Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial |
title | Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial |
title_full | Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial |
title_fullStr | Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial |
title_short | Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial |
title_sort | automatic vagus nerve stimulation triggered by ictal tachycardia: clinical outcomes and device performance—the u.s. e‐37 trial |
topic | Peripheral Nerve Stimulation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064739/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26663671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12376 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fisherroberts automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial AT afrapegah automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial AT mackenmicheal automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial AT minecandanielan automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial AT bagicanto automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial AT benbadisselimr automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial AT helmerssandral automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial AT sinhasaurabhr automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial AT slaterjeremy automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial AT treimandavid automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial AT begnaudjason automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial AT ramanpradheep automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial AT najimipourbita automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial |