Cargando…

Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial

OBJECTIVES: The Automatic Stimulation Mode (AutoStim) feature of the Model 106 Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy System stimulates the left vagus nerve on detecting tachycardia. This study evaluates performance, safety of the AutoStim feature during a 3‐5‐day Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) stay...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fisher, Robert S., Afra, Pegah, Macken, Micheal, Minecan, Daniela N., Bagić, Anto, Benbadis, Selim R., Helmers, Sandra L., Sinha, Saurabh R., Slater, Jeremy, Treiman, David, Begnaud, Jason, Raman, Pradheep, Najimipour, Bita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26663671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12376
_version_ 1782460219886927872
author Fisher, Robert S.
Afra, Pegah
Macken, Micheal
Minecan, Daniela N.
Bagić, Anto
Benbadis, Selim R.
Helmers, Sandra L.
Sinha, Saurabh R.
Slater, Jeremy
Treiman, David
Begnaud, Jason
Raman, Pradheep
Najimipour, Bita
author_facet Fisher, Robert S.
Afra, Pegah
Macken, Micheal
Minecan, Daniela N.
Bagić, Anto
Benbadis, Selim R.
Helmers, Sandra L.
Sinha, Saurabh R.
Slater, Jeremy
Treiman, David
Begnaud, Jason
Raman, Pradheep
Najimipour, Bita
author_sort Fisher, Robert S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The Automatic Stimulation Mode (AutoStim) feature of the Model 106 Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy System stimulates the left vagus nerve on detecting tachycardia. This study evaluates performance, safety of the AutoStim feature during a 3‐5‐day Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) stay and long‐ term clinical outcomes of the device stimulating in all modes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The E‐37 protocol (NCT01846741) was a prospective, unblinded, U.S. multisite study of the AspireSR(®) in subjects with drug‐resistant partial onset seizures and history of ictal tachycardia. VNS Normal and Magnet Modes stimulation were present at all times except during the EMU stay. Outpatient visits at 3, 6, and 12 months tracked seizure frequency, severity, quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty implanted subjects (ages 21–69) experienced 89 seizures in the EMU. 28/38 (73.7%) of complex partial and secondarily generalized seizures exhibited ≥20% increase in heart rate change. 31/89 (34.8%) of seizures were treated by Automatic Stimulation on detection; 19/31 (61.3%) seizures ended during the stimulation with a median time from stimulation onset to seizure end of 35 sec. Mean duty cycle at six‐months increased from 11% to 16%. At 12 months, quality of life and seizure severity scores improved, and responder rate was 50%. Common adverse events were dysphonia (n = 7), convulsion (n = 6), and oropharyngeal pain (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: The Model 106 performed as intended in the study population, was well tolerated and associated with clinical improvement from baseline. The study design did not allow determination of which factors were responsible for improvements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5064739
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50647392016-10-19 Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial Fisher, Robert S. Afra, Pegah Macken, Micheal Minecan, Daniela N. Bagić, Anto Benbadis, Selim R. Helmers, Sandra L. Sinha, Saurabh R. Slater, Jeremy Treiman, David Begnaud, Jason Raman, Pradheep Najimipour, Bita Neuromodulation Peripheral Nerve Stimulation OBJECTIVES: The Automatic Stimulation Mode (AutoStim) feature of the Model 106 Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) Therapy System stimulates the left vagus nerve on detecting tachycardia. This study evaluates performance, safety of the AutoStim feature during a 3‐5‐day Epilepsy Monitoring Unit (EMU) stay and long‐ term clinical outcomes of the device stimulating in all modes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The E‐37 protocol (NCT01846741) was a prospective, unblinded, U.S. multisite study of the AspireSR(®) in subjects with drug‐resistant partial onset seizures and history of ictal tachycardia. VNS Normal and Magnet Modes stimulation were present at all times except during the EMU stay. Outpatient visits at 3, 6, and 12 months tracked seizure frequency, severity, quality of life, and adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty implanted subjects (ages 21–69) experienced 89 seizures in the EMU. 28/38 (73.7%) of complex partial and secondarily generalized seizures exhibited ≥20% increase in heart rate change. 31/89 (34.8%) of seizures were treated by Automatic Stimulation on detection; 19/31 (61.3%) seizures ended during the stimulation with a median time from stimulation onset to seizure end of 35 sec. Mean duty cycle at six‐months increased from 11% to 16%. At 12 months, quality of life and seizure severity scores improved, and responder rate was 50%. Common adverse events were dysphonia (n = 7), convulsion (n = 6), and oropharyngeal pain (n = 3). CONCLUSIONS: The Model 106 performed as intended in the study population, was well tolerated and associated with clinical improvement from baseline. The study design did not allow determination of which factors were responsible for improvements. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-12-13 2016-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5064739/ /pubmed/26663671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12376 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Neuromodulation Society This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Peripheral Nerve Stimulation
Fisher, Robert S.
Afra, Pegah
Macken, Micheal
Minecan, Daniela N.
Bagić, Anto
Benbadis, Selim R.
Helmers, Sandra L.
Sinha, Saurabh R.
Slater, Jeremy
Treiman, David
Begnaud, Jason
Raman, Pradheep
Najimipour, Bita
Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial
title Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial
title_full Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial
title_fullStr Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial
title_full_unstemmed Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial
title_short Automatic Vagus Nerve Stimulation Triggered by Ictal Tachycardia: Clinical Outcomes and Device Performance—The U.S. E‐37 Trial
title_sort automatic vagus nerve stimulation triggered by ictal tachycardia: clinical outcomes and device performance—the u.s. e‐37 trial
topic Peripheral Nerve Stimulation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064739/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26663671
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ner.12376
work_keys_str_mv AT fisherroberts automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial
AT afrapegah automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial
AT mackenmicheal automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial
AT minecandanielan automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial
AT bagicanto automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial
AT benbadisselimr automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial
AT helmerssandral automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial
AT sinhasaurabhr automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial
AT slaterjeremy automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial
AT treimandavid automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial
AT begnaudjason automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial
AT ramanpradheep automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial
AT najimipourbita automaticvagusnervestimulationtriggeredbyictaltachycardiaclinicaloutcomesanddeviceperformancetheuse37trial