Cargando…
A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Journal abstracts including those reporting systematic reviews (SR) should contain sufficiently clear and accurate information for adequate comprehension and interpretation. The aim was to compare the quality of reporting of abstracts of SRs including meta-analysis published in high-impa...
Autores principales: | Bigna, Jean Joel R., Um, Lewis N., Nansseu, Jobert Richie N. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064935/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27737710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0356-8 |
Ejemplares similares
-
PRISMA for Abstracts: Reporting Systematic Reviews in Journal and Conference Abstracts
por: Beller, Elaine M., et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Pulmonary hypertension in the global population of adolescents and adults living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bigna, Jean Joel, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Prevalence and etiologies of pulmonary hypertension in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Bigna, Jean Joel, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Incidence, prevalence and genetic determinants of neonatal diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
por: Nansseu, Jobert Richie N., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Body size measures and risk of venous thromboembolism: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Kaze, Arnaud D, et al.
Publicado: (2018)