Cargando…
Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage
For patients who survive the initial bleeding event of a ruptured brain aneurysm, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is one of the most important causes of mortality and poor neurological outcome. New insights in the last decade have led to an important paradigm shift in the understanding of DCI pathog...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27737684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1447-6 |
_version_ | 1782460251474231296 |
---|---|
author | Francoeur, Charles L. Mayer, Stephan A. |
author_facet | Francoeur, Charles L. Mayer, Stephan A. |
author_sort | Francoeur, Charles L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | For patients who survive the initial bleeding event of a ruptured brain aneurysm, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is one of the most important causes of mortality and poor neurological outcome. New insights in the last decade have led to an important paradigm shift in the understanding of DCI pathogenesis. Large-vessel cerebral vasospasm has been challenged as the sole causal mechanism; new hypotheses now focus on the early brain injury, microcirculatory dysfunction, impaired autoregulation, and spreading depolarization. Prevention of DCI primarily relies on nimodipine administration and optimization of blood volume and cardiac performance. Neurological monitoring is essential for early DCI detection and intervention. Serial clinical examination combined with intermittent transcranial Doppler ultrasonography and CT angiography (with or without perfusion) is the most commonly used monitoring paradigm, and usually suffices in good grade patients. By contrast, poor grade patients (WFNS grades 4 and 5) require more advanced monitoring because stupor and coma reduce sensitivity to the effects of ischemia. Greater reliance on CT perfusion imaging, continuous electroencephalography, and invasive brain multimodality monitoring are potential strategies to improve situational awareness as it relates to detecting DCI. Pharmacologically-induced hypertension combined with volume is the established first-line therapy for DCI; a good clinical response with reversal of the presenting deficit occurs in 70 % of patients. Medically refractory DCI, defined as failure to respond adequately to these measures, should trigger step-wise escalation of rescue therapy. Level 1 rescue therapy consists of cardiac output optimization, hemoglobin optimization, and endovascular intervention, including angioplasty and intra-arterial vasodilator infusion. In highly refractory cases, level 2 rescue therapies are also considered, none of which have been validated. This review provides an overview of current state-of-the-art care for DCI management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5064957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50649572016-10-18 Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage Francoeur, Charles L. Mayer, Stephan A. Crit Care Review For patients who survive the initial bleeding event of a ruptured brain aneurysm, delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) is one of the most important causes of mortality and poor neurological outcome. New insights in the last decade have led to an important paradigm shift in the understanding of DCI pathogenesis. Large-vessel cerebral vasospasm has been challenged as the sole causal mechanism; new hypotheses now focus on the early brain injury, microcirculatory dysfunction, impaired autoregulation, and spreading depolarization. Prevention of DCI primarily relies on nimodipine administration and optimization of blood volume and cardiac performance. Neurological monitoring is essential for early DCI detection and intervention. Serial clinical examination combined with intermittent transcranial Doppler ultrasonography and CT angiography (with or without perfusion) is the most commonly used monitoring paradigm, and usually suffices in good grade patients. By contrast, poor grade patients (WFNS grades 4 and 5) require more advanced monitoring because stupor and coma reduce sensitivity to the effects of ischemia. Greater reliance on CT perfusion imaging, continuous electroencephalography, and invasive brain multimodality monitoring are potential strategies to improve situational awareness as it relates to detecting DCI. Pharmacologically-induced hypertension combined with volume is the established first-line therapy for DCI; a good clinical response with reversal of the presenting deficit occurs in 70 % of patients. Medically refractory DCI, defined as failure to respond adequately to these measures, should trigger step-wise escalation of rescue therapy. Level 1 rescue therapy consists of cardiac output optimization, hemoglobin optimization, and endovascular intervention, including angioplasty and intra-arterial vasodilator infusion. In highly refractory cases, level 2 rescue therapies are also considered, none of which have been validated. This review provides an overview of current state-of-the-art care for DCI management. BioMed Central 2016-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5064957/ /pubmed/27737684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1447-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Francoeur, Charles L. Mayer, Stephan A. Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage |
title | Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage |
title_full | Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage |
title_fullStr | Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage |
title_full_unstemmed | Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage |
title_short | Management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage |
title_sort | management of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27737684 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1447-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT francoeurcharlesl managementofdelayedcerebralischemiaaftersubarachnoidhemorrhage AT mayerstephana managementofdelayedcerebralischemiaaftersubarachnoidhemorrhage |