Cargando…

Dispatch guideline adherence and response interval—a study of emergency medical calls in Norway

BACKGROUND: The Emergency Medical Communication Centre (EMCC) operators in Norway report using the Norwegian Index for Medical Emergency Assistance (Index), a criteria-based dispatch guideline, in about 75 % of medical emergency calls. The main purpose of a dispatch guideline is to assist the operat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellensen, Eirin N., Wisborg, Torben, Hunskaar, Steinar, Zakariassen, Erik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27737641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-016-0105-2
_version_ 1782460252405366784
author Ellensen, Eirin N.
Wisborg, Torben
Hunskaar, Steinar
Zakariassen, Erik
author_facet Ellensen, Eirin N.
Wisborg, Torben
Hunskaar, Steinar
Zakariassen, Erik
author_sort Ellensen, Eirin N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Emergency Medical Communication Centre (EMCC) operators in Norway report using the Norwegian Index for Medical Emergency Assistance (Index), a criteria-based dispatch guideline, in about 75 % of medical emergency calls. The main purpose of a dispatch guideline is to assist the operator in securing a correct response as quickly as possible. The effect of using the guideline on EMCC response interval is as yet unknown. We wanted to ascertain an objective measure of guideline adherence, and explore a possible effect on emergency medical dispatch (EMD) response interval. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study based on digital telephone recordings and EMCC records; 299 random calls ending in acute and urgent responses from seven strategically selected EMCCs were included. Ability to confirm location and patient consciousness within an acceptable time interval and structural use of criteria cards were indicators used to create an overall guideline adherence variable. We then explored the relationship between different levels of guideline adherence and EMD response interval. RESULTS: The overall guideline adherence was 80 %. Location and patient consciousness were confirmed within 1 min in 83 % of the calls. The criteria cards were used systematically as intended in 64 % of the cases. Total median response interval was 2:28, with 2:01 for acute calls and 4:10 for urgent calls (p < 0.0005). Lower guideline adherence was associated with higher EMD response interval (p < 0.0005). CONCLUSION: The measured guideline adherence was higher than previously reported by the operators themselves. Patient consciousness was rapidly confirmed in the majority of cases. Failure to use Index criteria as intended result in delayed ambulance dispatch and a potential risk of undertriage. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12873-016-0105-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5064961
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50649612016-10-18 Dispatch guideline adherence and response interval—a study of emergency medical calls in Norway Ellensen, Eirin N. Wisborg, Torben Hunskaar, Steinar Zakariassen, Erik BMC Emerg Med Research Article BACKGROUND: The Emergency Medical Communication Centre (EMCC) operators in Norway report using the Norwegian Index for Medical Emergency Assistance (Index), a criteria-based dispatch guideline, in about 75 % of medical emergency calls. The main purpose of a dispatch guideline is to assist the operator in securing a correct response as quickly as possible. The effect of using the guideline on EMCC response interval is as yet unknown. We wanted to ascertain an objective measure of guideline adherence, and explore a possible effect on emergency medical dispatch (EMD) response interval. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study based on digital telephone recordings and EMCC records; 299 random calls ending in acute and urgent responses from seven strategically selected EMCCs were included. Ability to confirm location and patient consciousness within an acceptable time interval and structural use of criteria cards were indicators used to create an overall guideline adherence variable. We then explored the relationship between different levels of guideline adherence and EMD response interval. RESULTS: The overall guideline adherence was 80 %. Location and patient consciousness were confirmed within 1 min in 83 % of the calls. The criteria cards were used systematically as intended in 64 % of the cases. Total median response interval was 2:28, with 2:01 for acute calls and 4:10 for urgent calls (p < 0.0005). Lower guideline adherence was associated with higher EMD response interval (p < 0.0005). CONCLUSION: The measured guideline adherence was higher than previously reported by the operators themselves. Patient consciousness was rapidly confirmed in the majority of cases. Failure to use Index criteria as intended result in delayed ambulance dispatch and a potential risk of undertriage. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12873-016-0105-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5064961/ /pubmed/27737641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-016-0105-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ellensen, Eirin N.
Wisborg, Torben
Hunskaar, Steinar
Zakariassen, Erik
Dispatch guideline adherence and response interval—a study of emergency medical calls in Norway
title Dispatch guideline adherence and response interval—a study of emergency medical calls in Norway
title_full Dispatch guideline adherence and response interval—a study of emergency medical calls in Norway
title_fullStr Dispatch guideline adherence and response interval—a study of emergency medical calls in Norway
title_full_unstemmed Dispatch guideline adherence and response interval—a study of emergency medical calls in Norway
title_short Dispatch guideline adherence and response interval—a study of emergency medical calls in Norway
title_sort dispatch guideline adherence and response interval—a study of emergency medical calls in norway
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5064961/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27737641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-016-0105-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ellenseneirinn dispatchguidelineadherenceandresponseintervalastudyofemergencymedicalcallsinnorway
AT wisborgtorben dispatchguidelineadherenceandresponseintervalastudyofemergencymedicalcallsinnorway
AT hunskaarsteinar dispatchguidelineadherenceandresponseintervalastudyofemergencymedicalcallsinnorway
AT zakariassenerik dispatchguidelineadherenceandresponseintervalastudyofemergencymedicalcallsinnorway