Cargando…

mARC Treatment of Hypopharynx Carcinoma with Flat and Flattening-Filter-Free Beam Energies – A Planning Study

BACKGROUND: The recently implemented mARC-rotation-technique is capable to deliver high dose rate bursts. For the case of hypopharynx cancer plans we evaluate whether the mARC can achieve an advantage in treatment time in comparison to IMRT. These plans consider two arcs with flat and flattening fil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bell, Katharina, Fleckenstein, Jochen, Nuesken, Frank, Licht, Norbert, Rübe, Christian, Dzierma, Yvonne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27741272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164616
_version_ 1782460281281052672
author Bell, Katharina
Fleckenstein, Jochen
Nuesken, Frank
Licht, Norbert
Rübe, Christian
Dzierma, Yvonne
author_facet Bell, Katharina
Fleckenstein, Jochen
Nuesken, Frank
Licht, Norbert
Rübe, Christian
Dzierma, Yvonne
author_sort Bell, Katharina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The recently implemented mARC-rotation-technique is capable to deliver high dose rate bursts. For the case of hypopharynx cancer plans we evaluate whether the mARC can achieve an advantage in treatment time in comparison to IMRT. These plans consider two arcs with flat and flattening filter free (FFF) beam energies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 8 hypopharynx-cancer patients step-and-shoot-IMRT and mARC plans were created retrospectively using flat and FFF beam energy. The comparison of the plan scenarios considered measures of quality for PTV coverage and sparing of organs at risk. All plans were irradiated on an anthromorphic phantom equipped with thermoluminescent dosimeters to measure scattered dose and treatment times. RESULTS: A visual comparison of the dose distribution did not show a marked preference for either technique or energy. The statistical evaluation yielded significant differences in favor of the mARC technique and the FFF energy. Scattered dose could be decreased markedly by the use of the mARC technique. Treatment times could be reduced up to 3 minutes with the use of mARC in comparison to IMRT. The high dose rate energy results in another time advantage of about 1 minute. CONCLUSIONS: All four plan scenarios yielded equally good quality plans. A combination of the mARC technique with FFF 7 MV high dose rate resulted in a decrease of treatment times from about 9 minutes to 5–6 minutes in comparison to 6 MV IMRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5065169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50651692016-10-27 mARC Treatment of Hypopharynx Carcinoma with Flat and Flattening-Filter-Free Beam Energies – A Planning Study Bell, Katharina Fleckenstein, Jochen Nuesken, Frank Licht, Norbert Rübe, Christian Dzierma, Yvonne PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The recently implemented mARC-rotation-technique is capable to deliver high dose rate bursts. For the case of hypopharynx cancer plans we evaluate whether the mARC can achieve an advantage in treatment time in comparison to IMRT. These plans consider two arcs with flat and flattening filter free (FFF) beam energies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 8 hypopharynx-cancer patients step-and-shoot-IMRT and mARC plans were created retrospectively using flat and FFF beam energy. The comparison of the plan scenarios considered measures of quality for PTV coverage and sparing of organs at risk. All plans were irradiated on an anthromorphic phantom equipped with thermoluminescent dosimeters to measure scattered dose and treatment times. RESULTS: A visual comparison of the dose distribution did not show a marked preference for either technique or energy. The statistical evaluation yielded significant differences in favor of the mARC technique and the FFF energy. Scattered dose could be decreased markedly by the use of the mARC technique. Treatment times could be reduced up to 3 minutes with the use of mARC in comparison to IMRT. The high dose rate energy results in another time advantage of about 1 minute. CONCLUSIONS: All four plan scenarios yielded equally good quality plans. A combination of the mARC technique with FFF 7 MV high dose rate resulted in a decrease of treatment times from about 9 minutes to 5–6 minutes in comparison to 6 MV IMRT. Public Library of Science 2016-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5065169/ /pubmed/27741272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164616 Text en © 2016 Bell et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bell, Katharina
Fleckenstein, Jochen
Nuesken, Frank
Licht, Norbert
Rübe, Christian
Dzierma, Yvonne
mARC Treatment of Hypopharynx Carcinoma with Flat and Flattening-Filter-Free Beam Energies – A Planning Study
title mARC Treatment of Hypopharynx Carcinoma with Flat and Flattening-Filter-Free Beam Energies – A Planning Study
title_full mARC Treatment of Hypopharynx Carcinoma with Flat and Flattening-Filter-Free Beam Energies – A Planning Study
title_fullStr mARC Treatment of Hypopharynx Carcinoma with Flat and Flattening-Filter-Free Beam Energies – A Planning Study
title_full_unstemmed mARC Treatment of Hypopharynx Carcinoma with Flat and Flattening-Filter-Free Beam Energies – A Planning Study
title_short mARC Treatment of Hypopharynx Carcinoma with Flat and Flattening-Filter-Free Beam Energies – A Planning Study
title_sort marc treatment of hypopharynx carcinoma with flat and flattening-filter-free beam energies – a planning study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27741272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164616
work_keys_str_mv AT bellkatharina marctreatmentofhypopharynxcarcinomawithflatandflatteningfilterfreebeamenergiesaplanningstudy
AT fleckensteinjochen marctreatmentofhypopharynxcarcinomawithflatandflatteningfilterfreebeamenergiesaplanningstudy
AT nueskenfrank marctreatmentofhypopharynxcarcinomawithflatandflatteningfilterfreebeamenergiesaplanningstudy
AT lichtnorbert marctreatmentofhypopharynxcarcinomawithflatandflatteningfilterfreebeamenergiesaplanningstudy
AT rubechristian marctreatmentofhypopharynxcarcinomawithflatandflatteningfilterfreebeamenergiesaplanningstudy
AT dziermayvonne marctreatmentofhypopharynxcarcinomawithflatandflatteningfilterfreebeamenergiesaplanningstudy