Cargando…
Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence?
Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy testing (PGD-A) is a tool to identify euploid embryos during IVF. The suggested populations of patients that can benefit from it are infertile women of advanced maternal age, with a history of recurrent miscarriages and/or IVF failures. However, a ge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27491771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0785-2 |
_version_ | 1782460336155131904 |
---|---|
author | Vaiarelli, Alberto Cimadomo, Danilo Capalbo, Antonio Orlando, Giovanna Sapienza, Fabio Colamaria, Silvia Palagiano, Antonio Bulletti, Carlo Rienzi, Laura Ubaldi, Filippo Maria |
author_facet | Vaiarelli, Alberto Cimadomo, Danilo Capalbo, Antonio Orlando, Giovanna Sapienza, Fabio Colamaria, Silvia Palagiano, Antonio Bulletti, Carlo Rienzi, Laura Ubaldi, Filippo Maria |
author_sort | Vaiarelli, Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy testing (PGD-A) is a tool to identify euploid embryos during IVF. The suggested populations of patients that can benefit from it are infertile women of advanced maternal age, with a history of recurrent miscarriages and/or IVF failures. However, a general consensus has not yet been reached.After the clinical failure of its first version based on cleavage stage biopsy and 9 chromosome-FISH analysis, PGD-A is currently performed by 24 chromosome screening techniques on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies. This approach has been clearly demonstrated to involve a higher clinical efficiency with respect to the standard care, in terms of sustained pregnancy rate per transfer and lower miscarriage rate. However, data about PGD-A efficacy calculated on a per intention-to-treat basis, as well as an analysis of its cost-effectiveness, are still missing.TE biopsy is a safe and extensively validated approach with low biological and technical margin of error. Firstly, the prevalence of mosaic diploid/aneuploid blastocysts is estimated to be between 0 and 16 %, thus largely tolerable. Secondly, all the comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) technologies adapted to, or designed to conduct PGD-A are highly concordant, and qPCR in particular has been proven to show the lowest false positive error rate (0.5 %) and a clinically recognizable error rate per blastocyst of just 0.21 %.In conclusion, there is a sufficient body of evidence to support the clinical application of CCS-based PGD-A on TE biopsies. The main limiting factor is the need for a high-standard laboratory to conduct blastocyst culture, biopsy and vitrification without impacting embryo viability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5065560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50655602016-10-28 Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence? Vaiarelli, Alberto Cimadomo, Danilo Capalbo, Antonio Orlando, Giovanna Sapienza, Fabio Colamaria, Silvia Palagiano, Antonio Bulletti, Carlo Rienzi, Laura Ubaldi, Filippo Maria J Assist Reprod Genet Review Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy testing (PGD-A) is a tool to identify euploid embryos during IVF. The suggested populations of patients that can benefit from it are infertile women of advanced maternal age, with a history of recurrent miscarriages and/or IVF failures. However, a general consensus has not yet been reached.After the clinical failure of its first version based on cleavage stage biopsy and 9 chromosome-FISH analysis, PGD-A is currently performed by 24 chromosome screening techniques on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies. This approach has been clearly demonstrated to involve a higher clinical efficiency with respect to the standard care, in terms of sustained pregnancy rate per transfer and lower miscarriage rate. However, data about PGD-A efficacy calculated on a per intention-to-treat basis, as well as an analysis of its cost-effectiveness, are still missing.TE biopsy is a safe and extensively validated approach with low biological and technical margin of error. Firstly, the prevalence of mosaic diploid/aneuploid blastocysts is estimated to be between 0 and 16 %, thus largely tolerable. Secondly, all the comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) technologies adapted to, or designed to conduct PGD-A are highly concordant, and qPCR in particular has been proven to show the lowest false positive error rate (0.5 %) and a clinically recognizable error rate per blastocyst of just 0.21 %.In conclusion, there is a sufficient body of evidence to support the clinical application of CCS-based PGD-A on TE biopsies. The main limiting factor is the need for a high-standard laboratory to conduct blastocyst culture, biopsy and vitrification without impacting embryo viability. Springer US 2016-08-05 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5065560/ /pubmed/27491771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0785-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Review Vaiarelli, Alberto Cimadomo, Danilo Capalbo, Antonio Orlando, Giovanna Sapienza, Fabio Colamaria, Silvia Palagiano, Antonio Bulletti, Carlo Rienzi, Laura Ubaldi, Filippo Maria Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence? |
title | Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence? |
title_full | Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence? |
title_fullStr | Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence? |
title_full_unstemmed | Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence? |
title_short | Pre-implantation genetic testing in ART: who will benefit and what is the evidence? |
title_sort | pre-implantation genetic testing in art: who will benefit and what is the evidence? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27491771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-016-0785-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vaiarellialberto preimplantationgenetictestinginartwhowillbenefitandwhatistheevidence AT cimadomodanilo preimplantationgenetictestinginartwhowillbenefitandwhatistheevidence AT capalboantonio preimplantationgenetictestinginartwhowillbenefitandwhatistheevidence AT orlandogiovanna preimplantationgenetictestinginartwhowillbenefitandwhatistheevidence AT sapienzafabio preimplantationgenetictestinginartwhowillbenefitandwhatistheevidence AT colamariasilvia preimplantationgenetictestinginartwhowillbenefitandwhatistheevidence AT palagianoantonio preimplantationgenetictestinginartwhowillbenefitandwhatistheevidence AT bulletticarlo preimplantationgenetictestinginartwhowillbenefitandwhatistheevidence AT rienzilaura preimplantationgenetictestinginartwhowillbenefitandwhatistheevidence AT ubaldifilippomaria preimplantationgenetictestinginartwhowillbenefitandwhatistheevidence |