Cargando…

Disclosing in utero HIV/ARV exposure to the HIV-exposed uninfected adolescent: is it necessary?

INTRODUCTION: The tremendous success of antiretroviral therapy has resulted in a diminishing population of perinatally HIV-infected children on the one hand and a mounting number of HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) children on the other. As the oldest of these HEU children are reaching adolescence, ques...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jao, Jennifer, Hazra, Rohan, Mellins, Claude A, Remien, Robert H, Abrams, Elaine J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International AIDS Society 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27741954
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.21099
_version_ 1782460357899452416
author Jao, Jennifer
Hazra, Rohan
Mellins, Claude A
Remien, Robert H
Abrams, Elaine J
author_facet Jao, Jennifer
Hazra, Rohan
Mellins, Claude A
Remien, Robert H
Abrams, Elaine J
author_sort Jao, Jennifer
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The tremendous success of antiretroviral therapy has resulted in a diminishing population of perinatally HIV-infected children on the one hand and a mounting number of HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) children on the other. As the oldest of these HEU children are reaching adolescence, questions have emerged surrounding the implications of HEU status disclosure to these adolescents. This article outlines the arguments for and against disclosure of a child's HEU status. DISCUSSION: Disclosure of a child's HEU status, by definition, requires disclosure of maternal HIV status. It is necessary to weigh the benefits and harms which could occur with disclosure in each of the following domains: psychosocial impact, long-term physical health of the HEU individual and the public health impact. Does disclosure improve or worsen the psychological health of the HEU individual and extended family unit? Do present data on the long-term safety of in utero HIV/ARV exposure reveal potential health risks which merit disclosure to the HEU adolescent? What research and public health programmes or systems need to be in place to afford monitoring of HEU individuals and which, if any, of these require disclosure? CONCLUSIONS: At present, it is not clear that there is sufficient evidence on whether long-term adverse effects are associated with in utero HIV/ARV exposures, making it difficult to mandate universal disclosure. However, as more countries adopt electronic medical record systems, the HEU status of an individual should be an important piece of the health record which follows the infant not only through childhood and adolescence but also adulthood. Clinicians and researchers should continue to approach the dialogue around mother–child disclosure with sensitivity and a cogent consideration of the evolving risks and benefits as new information becomes available while also working to maintain documentation of an individual's perinatal HIV/ARV exposures as a vital part of his/her medical records. As more long-term adult safety data on in utero HIV/ARV exposures become available these decisions may become clearer, but at this time, they remain complex and multi-faceted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5065689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher International AIDS Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50656892016-10-17 Disclosing in utero HIV/ARV exposure to the HIV-exposed uninfected adolescent: is it necessary? Jao, Jennifer Hazra, Rohan Mellins, Claude A Remien, Robert H Abrams, Elaine J J Int AIDS Soc Debate Article INTRODUCTION: The tremendous success of antiretroviral therapy has resulted in a diminishing population of perinatally HIV-infected children on the one hand and a mounting number of HIV-exposed uninfected (HEU) children on the other. As the oldest of these HEU children are reaching adolescence, questions have emerged surrounding the implications of HEU status disclosure to these adolescents. This article outlines the arguments for and against disclosure of a child's HEU status. DISCUSSION: Disclosure of a child's HEU status, by definition, requires disclosure of maternal HIV status. It is necessary to weigh the benefits and harms which could occur with disclosure in each of the following domains: psychosocial impact, long-term physical health of the HEU individual and the public health impact. Does disclosure improve or worsen the psychological health of the HEU individual and extended family unit? Do present data on the long-term safety of in utero HIV/ARV exposure reveal potential health risks which merit disclosure to the HEU adolescent? What research and public health programmes or systems need to be in place to afford monitoring of HEU individuals and which, if any, of these require disclosure? CONCLUSIONS: At present, it is not clear that there is sufficient evidence on whether long-term adverse effects are associated with in utero HIV/ARV exposures, making it difficult to mandate universal disclosure. However, as more countries adopt electronic medical record systems, the HEU status of an individual should be an important piece of the health record which follows the infant not only through childhood and adolescence but also adulthood. Clinicians and researchers should continue to approach the dialogue around mother–child disclosure with sensitivity and a cogent consideration of the evolving risks and benefits as new information becomes available while also working to maintain documentation of an individual's perinatal HIV/ARV exposures as a vital part of his/her medical records. As more long-term adult safety data on in utero HIV/ARV exposures become available these decisions may become clearer, but at this time, they remain complex and multi-faceted. International AIDS Society 2016-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5065689/ /pubmed/27741954 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.21099 Text en © 2016 Jao J et al; licensee International AIDS Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Debate Article
Jao, Jennifer
Hazra, Rohan
Mellins, Claude A
Remien, Robert H
Abrams, Elaine J
Disclosing in utero HIV/ARV exposure to the HIV-exposed uninfected adolescent: is it necessary?
title Disclosing in utero HIV/ARV exposure to the HIV-exposed uninfected adolescent: is it necessary?
title_full Disclosing in utero HIV/ARV exposure to the HIV-exposed uninfected adolescent: is it necessary?
title_fullStr Disclosing in utero HIV/ARV exposure to the HIV-exposed uninfected adolescent: is it necessary?
title_full_unstemmed Disclosing in utero HIV/ARV exposure to the HIV-exposed uninfected adolescent: is it necessary?
title_short Disclosing in utero HIV/ARV exposure to the HIV-exposed uninfected adolescent: is it necessary?
title_sort disclosing in utero hiv/arv exposure to the hiv-exposed uninfected adolescent: is it necessary?
topic Debate Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27741954
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.19.1.21099
work_keys_str_mv AT jaojennifer disclosinginuterohivarvexposuretothehivexposeduninfectedadolescentisitnecessary
AT hazrarohan disclosinginuterohivarvexposuretothehivexposeduninfectedadolescentisitnecessary
AT mellinsclaudea disclosinginuterohivarvexposuretothehivexposeduninfectedadolescentisitnecessary
AT remienroberth disclosinginuterohivarvexposuretothehivexposeduninfectedadolescentisitnecessary
AT abramselainej disclosinginuterohivarvexposuretothehivexposeduninfectedadolescentisitnecessary