Cargando…

Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community?

In order to maintain food security and sustainability of production under climate change, interdisciplinary and international collaboration in research is essential. In the EU, knowledge hubs are important funding instruments for the development of an interconnected European Research Area. Here, net...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saetnan, Eli Rudinow, Kipling, Richard Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2064-5
_version_ 1782460379546255360
author Saetnan, Eli Rudinow
Kipling, Richard Philip
author_facet Saetnan, Eli Rudinow
Kipling, Richard Philip
author_sort Saetnan, Eli Rudinow
collection PubMed
description In order to maintain food security and sustainability of production under climate change, interdisciplinary and international collaboration in research is essential. In the EU, knowledge hubs are important funding instruments for the development of an interconnected European Research Area. Here, network analysis was used to assess whether the pilot knowledge hub MACSUR has affected interdisciplinary collaboration, using co-authorship of peer reviewed articles as a measure of collaboration. The broad community of all authors identified as active in the field of agriculture and climate change was increasingly well connected over the period studied. Between knowledge hub members, changes in network parameters suggest an increase in collaborative interaction beyond that expected due to network growth, and greater than that found in the broader community. Given that interdisciplinary networks often take several years to have an impact on research outputs, these changes within the relatively new MACSUR community provide evidence that the knowledge hub structure has been effective in stimulating collaboration. However, analysis showed that knowledge hub partners were initially well-connected, suggesting that the initiative may have gathered together researchers with particular resources or inclinations towards collaborative working. Long term, consistent funding and ongoing reflection to improve networking structures may be necessary to sustain the early positive signs from MACSUR, to extend its success to a wider community of researchers, or to repeat it in less connected fields of science. Tackling complex challenges such as climate change will require research structures that can effectively support and utilise the diversity of talents beyond the already well-connected core of scientists at major research institutes. But network research shows that this core, well-connected group are vital brokers in achieving wider integration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5065888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50658882016-10-28 Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community? Saetnan, Eli Rudinow Kipling, Richard Philip Scientometrics Article In order to maintain food security and sustainability of production under climate change, interdisciplinary and international collaboration in research is essential. In the EU, knowledge hubs are important funding instruments for the development of an interconnected European Research Area. Here, network analysis was used to assess whether the pilot knowledge hub MACSUR has affected interdisciplinary collaboration, using co-authorship of peer reviewed articles as a measure of collaboration. The broad community of all authors identified as active in the field of agriculture and climate change was increasingly well connected over the period studied. Between knowledge hub members, changes in network parameters suggest an increase in collaborative interaction beyond that expected due to network growth, and greater than that found in the broader community. Given that interdisciplinary networks often take several years to have an impact on research outputs, these changes within the relatively new MACSUR community provide evidence that the knowledge hub structure has been effective in stimulating collaboration. However, analysis showed that knowledge hub partners were initially well-connected, suggesting that the initiative may have gathered together researchers with particular resources or inclinations towards collaborative working. Long term, consistent funding and ongoing reflection to improve networking structures may be necessary to sustain the early positive signs from MACSUR, to extend its success to a wider community of researchers, or to repeat it in less connected fields of science. Tackling complex challenges such as climate change will require research structures that can effectively support and utilise the diversity of talents beyond the already well-connected core of scientists at major research institutes. But network research shows that this core, well-connected group are vital brokers in achieving wider integration. Springer Netherlands 2016-07-15 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5065888/ /pubmed/27795595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2064-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Saetnan, Eli Rudinow
Kipling, Richard Philip
Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community?
title Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community?
title_full Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community?
title_fullStr Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community?
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community?
title_short Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community?
title_sort evaluating a european knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: are we building a better connected community?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2064-5
work_keys_str_mv AT saetnanelirudinow evaluatingaeuropeanknowledgehubonclimatechangeinagriculturearewebuildingabetterconnectedcommunity
AT kiplingrichardphilip evaluatingaeuropeanknowledgehubonclimatechangeinagriculturearewebuildingabetterconnectedcommunity