Cargando…
Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community?
In order to maintain food security and sustainability of production under climate change, interdisciplinary and international collaboration in research is essential. In the EU, knowledge hubs are important funding instruments for the development of an interconnected European Research Area. Here, net...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2064-5 |
_version_ | 1782460379546255360 |
---|---|
author | Saetnan, Eli Rudinow Kipling, Richard Philip |
author_facet | Saetnan, Eli Rudinow Kipling, Richard Philip |
author_sort | Saetnan, Eli Rudinow |
collection | PubMed |
description | In order to maintain food security and sustainability of production under climate change, interdisciplinary and international collaboration in research is essential. In the EU, knowledge hubs are important funding instruments for the development of an interconnected European Research Area. Here, network analysis was used to assess whether the pilot knowledge hub MACSUR has affected interdisciplinary collaboration, using co-authorship of peer reviewed articles as a measure of collaboration. The broad community of all authors identified as active in the field of agriculture and climate change was increasingly well connected over the period studied. Between knowledge hub members, changes in network parameters suggest an increase in collaborative interaction beyond that expected due to network growth, and greater than that found in the broader community. Given that interdisciplinary networks often take several years to have an impact on research outputs, these changes within the relatively new MACSUR community provide evidence that the knowledge hub structure has been effective in stimulating collaboration. However, analysis showed that knowledge hub partners were initially well-connected, suggesting that the initiative may have gathered together researchers with particular resources or inclinations towards collaborative working. Long term, consistent funding and ongoing reflection to improve networking structures may be necessary to sustain the early positive signs from MACSUR, to extend its success to a wider community of researchers, or to repeat it in less connected fields of science. Tackling complex challenges such as climate change will require research structures that can effectively support and utilise the diversity of talents beyond the already well-connected core of scientists at major research institutes. But network research shows that this core, well-connected group are vital brokers in achieving wider integration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5065888 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50658882016-10-28 Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community? Saetnan, Eli Rudinow Kipling, Richard Philip Scientometrics Article In order to maintain food security and sustainability of production under climate change, interdisciplinary and international collaboration in research is essential. In the EU, knowledge hubs are important funding instruments for the development of an interconnected European Research Area. Here, network analysis was used to assess whether the pilot knowledge hub MACSUR has affected interdisciplinary collaboration, using co-authorship of peer reviewed articles as a measure of collaboration. The broad community of all authors identified as active in the field of agriculture and climate change was increasingly well connected over the period studied. Between knowledge hub members, changes in network parameters suggest an increase in collaborative interaction beyond that expected due to network growth, and greater than that found in the broader community. Given that interdisciplinary networks often take several years to have an impact on research outputs, these changes within the relatively new MACSUR community provide evidence that the knowledge hub structure has been effective in stimulating collaboration. However, analysis showed that knowledge hub partners were initially well-connected, suggesting that the initiative may have gathered together researchers with particular resources or inclinations towards collaborative working. Long term, consistent funding and ongoing reflection to improve networking structures may be necessary to sustain the early positive signs from MACSUR, to extend its success to a wider community of researchers, or to repeat it in less connected fields of science. Tackling complex challenges such as climate change will require research structures that can effectively support and utilise the diversity of talents beyond the already well-connected core of scientists at major research institutes. But network research shows that this core, well-connected group are vital brokers in achieving wider integration. Springer Netherlands 2016-07-15 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5065888/ /pubmed/27795595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2064-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Saetnan, Eli Rudinow Kipling, Richard Philip Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community? |
title | Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community? |
title_full | Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community? |
title_fullStr | Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community? |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community? |
title_short | Evaluating a European knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: Are we building a better connected community? |
title_sort | evaluating a european knowledge hub on climate change in agriculture: are we building a better connected community? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065888/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2064-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saetnanelirudinow evaluatingaeuropeanknowledgehubonclimatechangeinagriculturearewebuildingabetterconnectedcommunity AT kiplingrichardphilip evaluatingaeuropeanknowledgehubonclimatechangeinagriculturearewebuildingabetterconnectedcommunity |