Cargando…

An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details

In 2014 over 52,000 academics submitted >155,500 journal articles in 36 different disciplines for assessment in the UK’s four-year Research Evaluation Framework (the REF). In this paper the characteristics of the titles of these papers are assessed. Although these varied considerably between the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hudson, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2081-4
_version_ 1782460381951688704
author Hudson, John
author_facet Hudson, John
author_sort Hudson, John
collection PubMed
description In 2014 over 52,000 academics submitted >155,500 journal articles in 36 different disciplines for assessment in the UK’s four-year Research Evaluation Framework (the REF). In this paper the characteristics of the titles of these papers are assessed. Although these varied considerably between the disciplines, the main findings were that: (i) the lengths of the titles increased with the number of authors in almost all disciplines, (ii) the use of colons and question marks tended to decline with increasing author numbers—although there were a few disciplines, such as economics, where the reverse was evident, (iii) papers published later on in the 4-year period tended to have more authors than those published earlier, and (iv), in some disciplines, the numbers of subsequent citations to papers were higher when the titles were shorter and when they employed colons but lower when they used question marks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5065898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50658982016-10-28 An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details Hudson, John Scientometrics Article In 2014 over 52,000 academics submitted >155,500 journal articles in 36 different disciplines for assessment in the UK’s four-year Research Evaluation Framework (the REF). In this paper the characteristics of the titles of these papers are assessed. Although these varied considerably between the disciplines, the main findings were that: (i) the lengths of the titles increased with the number of authors in almost all disciplines, (ii) the use of colons and question marks tended to decline with increasing author numbers—although there were a few disciplines, such as economics, where the reverse was evident, (iii) papers published later on in the 4-year period tended to have more authors than those published earlier, and (iv), in some disciplines, the numbers of subsequent citations to papers were higher when the titles were shorter and when they employed colons but lower when they used question marks. Springer Netherlands 2016-07-29 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5065898/ /pubmed/27795594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2081-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Hudson, John
An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details
title An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details
title_full An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details
title_fullStr An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details
title_full_unstemmed An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details
title_short An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details
title_sort analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the uk ref in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2081-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hudsonjohn ananalysisofthetitlesofpaperssubmittedtotheukrefin2014authorsdisciplinesandstylisticdetails
AT hudsonjohn analysisofthetitlesofpaperssubmittedtotheukrefin2014authorsdisciplinesandstylisticdetails