Cargando…
An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details
In 2014 over 52,000 academics submitted >155,500 journal articles in 36 different disciplines for assessment in the UK’s four-year Research Evaluation Framework (the REF). In this paper the characteristics of the titles of these papers are assessed. Although these varied considerably between the...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2081-4 |
_version_ | 1782460381951688704 |
---|---|
author | Hudson, John |
author_facet | Hudson, John |
author_sort | Hudson, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 2014 over 52,000 academics submitted >155,500 journal articles in 36 different disciplines for assessment in the UK’s four-year Research Evaluation Framework (the REF). In this paper the characteristics of the titles of these papers are assessed. Although these varied considerably between the disciplines, the main findings were that: (i) the lengths of the titles increased with the number of authors in almost all disciplines, (ii) the use of colons and question marks tended to decline with increasing author numbers—although there were a few disciplines, such as economics, where the reverse was evident, (iii) papers published later on in the 4-year period tended to have more authors than those published earlier, and (iv), in some disciplines, the numbers of subsequent citations to papers were higher when the titles were shorter and when they employed colons but lower when they used question marks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5065898 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50658982016-10-28 An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details Hudson, John Scientometrics Article In 2014 over 52,000 academics submitted >155,500 journal articles in 36 different disciplines for assessment in the UK’s four-year Research Evaluation Framework (the REF). In this paper the characteristics of the titles of these papers are assessed. Although these varied considerably between the disciplines, the main findings were that: (i) the lengths of the titles increased with the number of authors in almost all disciplines, (ii) the use of colons and question marks tended to decline with increasing author numbers—although there were a few disciplines, such as economics, where the reverse was evident, (iii) papers published later on in the 4-year period tended to have more authors than those published earlier, and (iv), in some disciplines, the numbers of subsequent citations to papers were higher when the titles were shorter and when they employed colons but lower when they used question marks. Springer Netherlands 2016-07-29 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5065898/ /pubmed/27795594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2081-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Hudson, John An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details |
title | An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details |
title_full | An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details |
title_fullStr | An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details |
title_full_unstemmed | An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details |
title_short | An analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the UK REF in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details |
title_sort | analysis of the titles of papers submitted to the uk ref in 2014: authors, disciplines, and stylistic details |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27795594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2081-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hudsonjohn ananalysisofthetitlesofpaperssubmittedtotheukrefin2014authorsdisciplinesandstylisticdetails AT hudsonjohn analysisofthetitlesofpaperssubmittedtotheukrefin2014authorsdisciplinesandstylisticdetails |