Cargando…

Prognostic Factors for Node-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer after Curative Gastrectomy

PURPOSE: Lymph node (LN) metastasis is the best prognostic indicator in non-distant metastatic advanced gastric cancer. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of various clinicopathologic factors in node-negative advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Eun Woo, Lee, Woo Yong, Koo, Ho-Seok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752393
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.3.161
_version_ 1782460389178474496
author Lee, Eun Woo
Lee, Woo Yong
Koo, Ho-Seok
author_facet Lee, Eun Woo
Lee, Woo Yong
Koo, Ho-Seok
author_sort Lee, Eun Woo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Lymph node (LN) metastasis is the best prognostic indicator in non-distant metastatic advanced gastric cancer. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of various clinicopathologic factors in node-negative advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 254 patients with primary node-negative stage T2~4 gastric cancer. These patients were selected from a pool of 1,890 patients who underwent radical resection at Memorial Jin-Pok Kim Korea Gastric Cancer Center, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital between 1998 and 2008. RESULTS: Of the 254 patients, 128 patients (50.4%), 88 patients (34.6%), 37 patients (14.6%), and 1 patient (0.4%) had T2, T3, T4a, and T4b tumors, respectively. In a univariate analysis, operation type, T-stage, venous invasion, tumor size, and less than 15 LNs significantly correlated with tumor recurrence and cumulative overall survival. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, tumor size, venous invasion, and less than 15 LNs significantly and independently correlated with recurrence. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, tumor size (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.926; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.173~7.300; P=0.021), venous invasion (HR: 3.985; 95% CI: 1.401~11.338; P=0.010), and less than 15 LNs (HR: 0.092; 95% CI: 0.029~0.290; P<0.001) significantly correlated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Node-negative gastric cancers recurred in 8.3% of the patients in our study. Tumor size, venous invasion, and less than 15 LNs reliably predicted recurrence as well as survival. Aggressive postoperative treatments and timely follow-ups should be considered in cases with these characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5065945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Gastric Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50659452016-10-17 Prognostic Factors for Node-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer after Curative Gastrectomy Lee, Eun Woo Lee, Woo Yong Koo, Ho-Seok J Gastric Cancer Original Article PURPOSE: Lymph node (LN) metastasis is the best prognostic indicator in non-distant metastatic advanced gastric cancer. This study aimed to assess the prognostic value of various clinicopathologic factors in node-negative advanced gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of 254 patients with primary node-negative stage T2~4 gastric cancer. These patients were selected from a pool of 1,890 patients who underwent radical resection at Memorial Jin-Pok Kim Korea Gastric Cancer Center, Inje University Seoul Paik Hospital between 1998 and 2008. RESULTS: Of the 254 patients, 128 patients (50.4%), 88 patients (34.6%), 37 patients (14.6%), and 1 patient (0.4%) had T2, T3, T4a, and T4b tumors, respectively. In a univariate analysis, operation type, T-stage, venous invasion, tumor size, and less than 15 LNs significantly correlated with tumor recurrence and cumulative overall survival. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, tumor size, venous invasion, and less than 15 LNs significantly and independently correlated with recurrence. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, tumor size (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.926; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.173~7.300; P=0.021), venous invasion (HR: 3.985; 95% CI: 1.401~11.338; P=0.010), and less than 15 LNs (HR: 0.092; 95% CI: 0.029~0.290; P<0.001) significantly correlated with overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Node-negative gastric cancers recurred in 8.3% of the patients in our study. Tumor size, venous invasion, and less than 15 LNs reliably predicted recurrence as well as survival. Aggressive postoperative treatments and timely follow-ups should be considered in cases with these characteristics. The Korean Gastric Cancer Association 2016-09 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5065945/ /pubmed/27752393 http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.3.161 Text en Copyright © 2016 by The Korean Gastric Cancer Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Eun Woo
Lee, Woo Yong
Koo, Ho-Seok
Prognostic Factors for Node-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer after Curative Gastrectomy
title Prognostic Factors for Node-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer after Curative Gastrectomy
title_full Prognostic Factors for Node-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer after Curative Gastrectomy
title_fullStr Prognostic Factors for Node-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer after Curative Gastrectomy
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Factors for Node-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer after Curative Gastrectomy
title_short Prognostic Factors for Node-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer after Curative Gastrectomy
title_sort prognostic factors for node-negative advanced gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752393
http://dx.doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.3.161
work_keys_str_mv AT leeeunwoo prognosticfactorsfornodenegativeadvancedgastriccanceraftercurativegastrectomy
AT leewooyong prognosticfactorsfornodenegativeadvancedgastriccanceraftercurativegastrectomy
AT koohoseok prognosticfactorsfornodenegativeadvancedgastriccanceraftercurativegastrectomy