Cargando…

Are There Abnormalities in Peripheral and Central Components of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain?

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) was shown to be associated with longer reflex response latencies of trunk muscles during external upper limb perturbations. One theoretical, but rarely investigated possibility for longer reflex latencies might be related to modulated somatosensory information processing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Puta, Christian, Franz, Marcel, Blume, Kathrin R., Gabriel, Holger H. W., Miltner, Wolfgang H. R., Weiss, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00521
_version_ 1782460402945228800
author Puta, Christian
Franz, Marcel
Blume, Kathrin R.
Gabriel, Holger H. W.
Miltner, Wolfgang H. R.
Weiss, Thomas
author_facet Puta, Christian
Franz, Marcel
Blume, Kathrin R.
Gabriel, Holger H. W.
Miltner, Wolfgang H. R.
Weiss, Thomas
author_sort Puta, Christian
collection PubMed
description Chronic low back pain (CLBP) was shown to be associated with longer reflex response latencies of trunk muscles during external upper limb perturbations. One theoretical, but rarely investigated possibility for longer reflex latencies might be related to modulated somatosensory information processing. Therefore, the present study investigated somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation in CLBP patients and healthy controls (HC). Latencies of the peripheral N9 SEP component were used as the primary outcome. In addition, latencies and amplitudes of the central N20 SEP component, sensory thresholds, motor thresholds and nerve conduction velocity were also analyzed in CLBP patients and HC. There is a trend for the CLBP patients to exhibit longer N9 latencies at the ipsilateral Erb’s point compared to HC. This trend is substantiated by significantly longer N9 latencies in CLBP patients compared to normative data. None of the other parameters showed any significant difference between CLBP patients and HC. Overall, our data indicate small differences of the peripheral N9 SEP component; however, these differences cannot explain the reflex delay observed in CLBP patients. While it was important to rule out the contribution of early somatosensory processing and to elucidate its contribution to the delayed reflex responses in CLBP patients, further research is needed to find the primary source(s) of time-delayed reflexes in CLBP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5065995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50659952016-10-31 Are There Abnormalities in Peripheral and Central Components of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain? Puta, Christian Franz, Marcel Blume, Kathrin R. Gabriel, Holger H. W. Miltner, Wolfgang H. R. Weiss, Thomas Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Chronic low back pain (CLBP) was shown to be associated with longer reflex response latencies of trunk muscles during external upper limb perturbations. One theoretical, but rarely investigated possibility for longer reflex latencies might be related to modulated somatosensory information processing. Therefore, the present study investigated somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) to median nerve stimulation in CLBP patients and healthy controls (HC). Latencies of the peripheral N9 SEP component were used as the primary outcome. In addition, latencies and amplitudes of the central N20 SEP component, sensory thresholds, motor thresholds and nerve conduction velocity were also analyzed in CLBP patients and HC. There is a trend for the CLBP patients to exhibit longer N9 latencies at the ipsilateral Erb’s point compared to HC. This trend is substantiated by significantly longer N9 latencies in CLBP patients compared to normative data. None of the other parameters showed any significant difference between CLBP patients and HC. Overall, our data indicate small differences of the peripheral N9 SEP component; however, these differences cannot explain the reflex delay observed in CLBP patients. While it was important to rule out the contribution of early somatosensory processing and to elucidate its contribution to the delayed reflex responses in CLBP patients, further research is needed to find the primary source(s) of time-delayed reflexes in CLBP. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5065995/ /pubmed/27799904 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00521 Text en Copyright © 2016 Puta, Franz, Blume, Gabriel, Miltner and Weiss. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Puta, Christian
Franz, Marcel
Blume, Kathrin R.
Gabriel, Holger H. W.
Miltner, Wolfgang H. R.
Weiss, Thomas
Are There Abnormalities in Peripheral and Central Components of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain?
title Are There Abnormalities in Peripheral and Central Components of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain?
title_full Are There Abnormalities in Peripheral and Central Components of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain?
title_fullStr Are There Abnormalities in Peripheral and Central Components of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain?
title_full_unstemmed Are There Abnormalities in Peripheral and Central Components of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain?
title_short Are There Abnormalities in Peripheral and Central Components of Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain?
title_sort are there abnormalities in peripheral and central components of somatosensory evoked potentials in non-specific chronic low back pain?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5065995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27799904
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00521
work_keys_str_mv AT putachristian arethereabnormalitiesinperipheralandcentralcomponentsofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsinnonspecificchroniclowbackpain
AT franzmarcel arethereabnormalitiesinperipheralandcentralcomponentsofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsinnonspecificchroniclowbackpain
AT blumekathrinr arethereabnormalitiesinperipheralandcentralcomponentsofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsinnonspecificchroniclowbackpain
AT gabrielholgerhw arethereabnormalitiesinperipheralandcentralcomponentsofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsinnonspecificchroniclowbackpain
AT miltnerwolfganghr arethereabnormalitiesinperipheralandcentralcomponentsofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsinnonspecificchroniclowbackpain
AT weissthomas arethereabnormalitiesinperipheralandcentralcomponentsofsomatosensoryevokedpotentialsinnonspecificchroniclowbackpain