Cargando…
Evaluation of Novel Targeted Therapies in Aggressive Biology Sarcoma Patients after progression from US FDA approved Therapies
Prognosis of patients with advanced sarcoma after progression from FDA approved therapies remains grim. In this study, clinical outcomes of 100 patients with advanced sarcoma who received treatment on novel targeted therapy trials were evaluated. Outcomes of interest included best response, clinical...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27748430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35448 |
_version_ | 1782460439854055424 |
---|---|
author | Subbiah, Vivek Hess, Kenneth R. Khawaja, Muhammad Rizwan Wagner, Michael J. Tang, Chad Naing, Aung Fu, Siqing Janku, Filip Piha-Paul, Sarina Tsimberidou, Apostolia M. Herzog, Cynthia E. Ludwig, Joseph A. Patel, Shreyaskumar Ravi, Vinod Benjamin, Robert S. Meric-Bernstam, Funda Hong, David S. |
author_facet | Subbiah, Vivek Hess, Kenneth R. Khawaja, Muhammad Rizwan Wagner, Michael J. Tang, Chad Naing, Aung Fu, Siqing Janku, Filip Piha-Paul, Sarina Tsimberidou, Apostolia M. Herzog, Cynthia E. Ludwig, Joseph A. Patel, Shreyaskumar Ravi, Vinod Benjamin, Robert S. Meric-Bernstam, Funda Hong, David S. |
author_sort | Subbiah, Vivek |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prognosis of patients with advanced sarcoma after progression from FDA approved therapies remains grim. In this study, clinical outcomes of 100 patients with advanced sarcoma who received treatment on novel targeted therapy trials were evaluated. Outcomes of interest included best response, clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Median patient age was 48 years (range 14–80). Patients had received a median of 2 prior lines of systemic treatment. Phase I treatments were anti-VEGF–based (n = 45), mTOR inhibitor–based (n = 15), and anti-VEGF + mTOR inhibitor–based (n = 17) or involved other targets (n = 23). Best responses included partial response (n = 4) and stable disease (n = 57). Clinical benefit rate was 36% (95% confidence interval 27–46%). Median OS was 9.6 months (95% Confidence Interval 8.1–14.2); median PFS was 3.5 months (95% Confidence Interval 2.4–4.7). RMH prognostic score of 2 or 3 was associated with lower median OS (log-rank p-value < 0.0001) and PFS (log-rank p-value 0.0081). Receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy as part of phase I trial was also associated with shorter median OS (log-rank p-value 0.039). Patients with advanced sarcoma treated on phase I clinical trials had a clinical benefit rate of 36% and RMH score predicted survival. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5066200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50662002016-10-26 Evaluation of Novel Targeted Therapies in Aggressive Biology Sarcoma Patients after progression from US FDA approved Therapies Subbiah, Vivek Hess, Kenneth R. Khawaja, Muhammad Rizwan Wagner, Michael J. Tang, Chad Naing, Aung Fu, Siqing Janku, Filip Piha-Paul, Sarina Tsimberidou, Apostolia M. Herzog, Cynthia E. Ludwig, Joseph A. Patel, Shreyaskumar Ravi, Vinod Benjamin, Robert S. Meric-Bernstam, Funda Hong, David S. Sci Rep Article Prognosis of patients with advanced sarcoma after progression from FDA approved therapies remains grim. In this study, clinical outcomes of 100 patients with advanced sarcoma who received treatment on novel targeted therapy trials were evaluated. Outcomes of interest included best response, clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Median patient age was 48 years (range 14–80). Patients had received a median of 2 prior lines of systemic treatment. Phase I treatments were anti-VEGF–based (n = 45), mTOR inhibitor–based (n = 15), and anti-VEGF + mTOR inhibitor–based (n = 17) or involved other targets (n = 23). Best responses included partial response (n = 4) and stable disease (n = 57). Clinical benefit rate was 36% (95% confidence interval 27–46%). Median OS was 9.6 months (95% Confidence Interval 8.1–14.2); median PFS was 3.5 months (95% Confidence Interval 2.4–4.7). RMH prognostic score of 2 or 3 was associated with lower median OS (log-rank p-value < 0.0001) and PFS (log-rank p-value 0.0081). Receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy as part of phase I trial was also associated with shorter median OS (log-rank p-value 0.039). Patients with advanced sarcoma treated on phase I clinical trials had a clinical benefit rate of 36% and RMH score predicted survival. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5066200/ /pubmed/27748430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35448 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Subbiah, Vivek Hess, Kenneth R. Khawaja, Muhammad Rizwan Wagner, Michael J. Tang, Chad Naing, Aung Fu, Siqing Janku, Filip Piha-Paul, Sarina Tsimberidou, Apostolia M. Herzog, Cynthia E. Ludwig, Joseph A. Patel, Shreyaskumar Ravi, Vinod Benjamin, Robert S. Meric-Bernstam, Funda Hong, David S. Evaluation of Novel Targeted Therapies in Aggressive Biology Sarcoma Patients after progression from US FDA approved Therapies |
title | Evaluation of Novel Targeted Therapies in Aggressive Biology Sarcoma Patients after progression from US FDA approved Therapies |
title_full | Evaluation of Novel Targeted Therapies in Aggressive Biology Sarcoma Patients after progression from US FDA approved Therapies |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Novel Targeted Therapies in Aggressive Biology Sarcoma Patients after progression from US FDA approved Therapies |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Novel Targeted Therapies in Aggressive Biology Sarcoma Patients after progression from US FDA approved Therapies |
title_short | Evaluation of Novel Targeted Therapies in Aggressive Biology Sarcoma Patients after progression from US FDA approved Therapies |
title_sort | evaluation of novel targeted therapies in aggressive biology sarcoma patients after progression from us fda approved therapies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27748430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35448 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT subbiahvivek evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT hesskennethr evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT khawajamuhammadrizwan evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT wagnermichaelj evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT tangchad evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT naingaung evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT fusiqing evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT jankufilip evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT pihapaulsarina evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT tsimberidouapostoliam evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT herzogcynthiae evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT ludwigjosepha evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT patelshreyaskumar evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT ravivinod evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT benjaminroberts evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT mericbernstamfunda evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies AT hongdavids evaluationofnoveltargetedtherapiesinaggressivebiologysarcomapatientsafterprogressionfromusfdaapprovedtherapies |