Cargando…

Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients

BACKGROUND: Cataract surgery is the most common surgical procedure in ophthalmology. Biometry data and accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculations are very important in achieving the desired refractive outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare measurements using a new optical low coherence ref...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kongsap, Pipat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0059-1
_version_ 1782460462334476288
author Kongsap, Pipat
author_facet Kongsap, Pipat
author_sort Kongsap, Pipat
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cataract surgery is the most common surgical procedure in ophthalmology. Biometry data and accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculations are very important in achieving the desired refractive outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare measurements using a new optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer (OA-2000) and the gold standard partial coherence interferometry (PCI) optical biometer (IOLMaster 500). METHODS: Ocular biometry of cataract patients were measured by the OA-2000 and IOLMaster 500 to compare keratometry (K), axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), white-to-white (WTW) diameter, and IOL power using the SRK/T formula. RESULTS: One hundred and two eyes of 68 cataract patients were evaluated with the two optical biometers. The mean values of the AL, K, ACD, and WTW differed very little (OCLR biometer, 23.12 mm, 44.50 diopters (D), 3.06, and 11.64 mm, respectively; PCI biometer, 23.18 mm, 44.6 D, 3.15, and 11.86 mm, respectively), but the differences were significant (all, p ≤ 0.05). The AL, K, and ACD showed excellent correlations (r = 0.999, 0.980, and 0.824, respectively; all p < 0.001); however, there was a weak correlation of the WTW diameter between the two devices (r = 0.256). The IOL powers using the SRK-T formula derived from both instruments were very similar, with an excellent correlation (r = 0.989). The mean difference between the two instruments was 0.32 D. CONCLUSIONS: The OLCR biometer showed very a strong agreement with the standard PCI optical biometer for almost all ocular biometry measurements, except for the WTW diameter. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20160614003; date 06/09/2016; ‘retrospectively registered’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5066293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50662932016-11-10 Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients Kongsap, Pipat Eye Vis (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: Cataract surgery is the most common surgical procedure in ophthalmology. Biometry data and accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculations are very important in achieving the desired refractive outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare measurements using a new optical low coherence reflectometry (OLCR) biometer (OA-2000) and the gold standard partial coherence interferometry (PCI) optical biometer (IOLMaster 500). METHODS: Ocular biometry of cataract patients were measured by the OA-2000 and IOLMaster 500 to compare keratometry (K), axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), white-to-white (WTW) diameter, and IOL power using the SRK/T formula. RESULTS: One hundred and two eyes of 68 cataract patients were evaluated with the two optical biometers. The mean values of the AL, K, ACD, and WTW differed very little (OCLR biometer, 23.12 mm, 44.50 diopters (D), 3.06, and 11.64 mm, respectively; PCI biometer, 23.18 mm, 44.6 D, 3.15, and 11.86 mm, respectively), but the differences were significant (all, p ≤ 0.05). The AL, K, and ACD showed excellent correlations (r = 0.999, 0.980, and 0.824, respectively; all p < 0.001); however, there was a weak correlation of the WTW diameter between the two devices (r = 0.256). The IOL powers using the SRK-T formula derived from both instruments were very similar, with an excellent correlation (r = 0.989). The mean difference between the two instruments was 0.32 D. CONCLUSIONS: The OLCR biometer showed very a strong agreement with the standard PCI optical biometer for almost all ocular biometry measurements, except for the WTW diameter. TRIAL REGISTRATION: TCTR20160614003; date 06/09/2016; ‘retrospectively registered’. BioMed Central 2016-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5066293/ /pubmed/27833928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0059-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kongsap, Pipat
Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients
title Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients
title_full Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients
title_fullStr Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients
title_short Comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients
title_sort comparison of a new optical biometer and a standard biometer in cataract patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27833928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40662-016-0059-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kongsappipat comparisonofanewopticalbiometerandastandardbiometerincataractpatients