Cargando…

Dynamic Transmission Economic Evaluation of Infectious Disease Interventions in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review

Economic evaluation using dynamic transmission models is important for capturing the indirect effects of infectious disease interventions. We examine the use of these methods in low‐ and middle‐income countries, where infectious diseases constitute a major burden. This review is comprised of two par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drake, Tom L., Devine, Angela, Yeung, Shunmay, Day, Nicholas P. J., White, Lisa J., Lubell, Yoel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26778620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.3303
_version_ 1782460521944973312
author Drake, Tom L.
Devine, Angela
Yeung, Shunmay
Day, Nicholas P. J.
White, Lisa J.
Lubell, Yoel
author_facet Drake, Tom L.
Devine, Angela
Yeung, Shunmay
Day, Nicholas P. J.
White, Lisa J.
Lubell, Yoel
author_sort Drake, Tom L.
collection PubMed
description Economic evaluation using dynamic transmission models is important for capturing the indirect effects of infectious disease interventions. We examine the use of these methods in low‐ and middle‐income countries, where infectious diseases constitute a major burden. This review is comprised of two parts: (1) a summary of dynamic transmission economic evaluations across all disease areas published between 2011 and mid‐2014 and (2) an in‐depth review of mosquito‐borne disease studies focusing on health economic methods and reporting. Studies were identified through a systematic search of the MEDLINE database and supplemented by reference list screening. Fifty‐seven studies were eligible for inclusion in the all‐disease review. The most common subject disease was HIV/AIDS, followed by malaria. A diverse range of modelling methods, outcome metrics and sensitivity analyses were used, indicating little standardisation. Seventeen studies were included in the mosquito‐borne disease review. With notable exceptions, most studies did not employ economic evaluation methods beyond calculating a cost‐effectiveness ratio or net benefit. Many did not adhere to health care economic evaluations reporting guidelines, particularly with respect to full model reporting and uncertainty analysis. We present a summary of the state‐of‐the‐art and offer recommendations for improved implementation and reporting of health economic methods in this crossover discipline. © 2016 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5066646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50666462016-11-01 Dynamic Transmission Economic Evaluation of Infectious Disease Interventions in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review Drake, Tom L. Devine, Angela Yeung, Shunmay Day, Nicholas P. J. White, Lisa J. Lubell, Yoel Health Econ Economic evaluations in low‐and middle‐income countries: Methodological issues and challenges for priority‐setting Economic evaluation using dynamic transmission models is important for capturing the indirect effects of infectious disease interventions. We examine the use of these methods in low‐ and middle‐income countries, where infectious diseases constitute a major burden. This review is comprised of two parts: (1) a summary of dynamic transmission economic evaluations across all disease areas published between 2011 and mid‐2014 and (2) an in‐depth review of mosquito‐borne disease studies focusing on health economic methods and reporting. Studies were identified through a systematic search of the MEDLINE database and supplemented by reference list screening. Fifty‐seven studies were eligible for inclusion in the all‐disease review. The most common subject disease was HIV/AIDS, followed by malaria. A diverse range of modelling methods, outcome metrics and sensitivity analyses were used, indicating little standardisation. Seventeen studies were included in the mosquito‐borne disease review. With notable exceptions, most studies did not employ economic evaluation methods beyond calculating a cost‐effectiveness ratio or net benefit. Many did not adhere to health care economic evaluations reporting guidelines, particularly with respect to full model reporting and uncertainty analysis. We present a summary of the state‐of‐the‐art and offer recommendations for improved implementation and reporting of health economic methods in this crossover discipline. © 2016 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02 2016-01-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5066646/ /pubmed/26778620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.3303 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Health Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Economic evaluations in low‐and middle‐income countries: Methodological issues and challenges for priority‐setting
Drake, Tom L.
Devine, Angela
Yeung, Shunmay
Day, Nicholas P. J.
White, Lisa J.
Lubell, Yoel
Dynamic Transmission Economic Evaluation of Infectious Disease Interventions in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review
title Dynamic Transmission Economic Evaluation of Infectious Disease Interventions in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Dynamic Transmission Economic Evaluation of Infectious Disease Interventions in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Dynamic Transmission Economic Evaluation of Infectious Disease Interventions in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Transmission Economic Evaluation of Infectious Disease Interventions in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Dynamic Transmission Economic Evaluation of Infectious Disease Interventions in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort dynamic transmission economic evaluation of infectious disease interventions in low‐ and middle‐income countries: a systematic literature review
topic Economic evaluations in low‐and middle‐income countries: Methodological issues and challenges for priority‐setting
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26778620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hec.3303
work_keys_str_mv AT draketoml dynamictransmissioneconomicevaluationofinfectiousdiseaseinterventionsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicliteraturereview
AT devineangela dynamictransmissioneconomicevaluationofinfectiousdiseaseinterventionsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicliteraturereview
AT yeungshunmay dynamictransmissioneconomicevaluationofinfectiousdiseaseinterventionsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicliteraturereview
AT daynicholaspj dynamictransmissioneconomicevaluationofinfectiousdiseaseinterventionsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicliteraturereview
AT whitelisaj dynamictransmissioneconomicevaluationofinfectiousdiseaseinterventionsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicliteraturereview
AT lubellyoel dynamictransmissioneconomicevaluationofinfectiousdiseaseinterventionsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicliteraturereview