Cargando…

The hOGG1 Ser326Cys gene polymorphism and susceptibility for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To assess the susceptibility of the hOGG1 genetic polymorphism for bladder cancer and evaluate the impact of smoking exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Articles included in PubMed, Medline and Springer databases were retrieved using the following key words: “human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosyla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wenjuan, Cao, Jianzhong, Lu, Chong, Li, Yanjun, Gao, Keqing, Lu, Hanzhang, Wang, Zhiping, Wang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27583352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0446
_version_ 1782460557567197184
author Wenjuan, Cao
Jianzhong, Lu
Chong, Li
Yanjun, Gao
Keqing, Lu
Hanzhang, Wang
Zhiping, Wang
author_facet Wenjuan, Cao
Jianzhong, Lu
Chong, Li
Yanjun, Gao
Keqing, Lu
Hanzhang, Wang
Zhiping, Wang
author_sort Wenjuan, Cao
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the susceptibility of the hOGG1 genetic polymorphism for bladder cancer and evaluate the impact of smoking exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Articles included in PubMed, Medline and Springer databases were retrieved using the following key words: “human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase”, “OGG”, “OGG1”, “hOGG1”, “genetic variation”, “polymorphism” , “bladder cancer”, and “bladder carcinoma” to Meta-analysis was performed to detect whether there were differences between the bladder cancer group and the control group about the distribution of genotypes of the hOGG1 gene. RESULTS: The results showed that there are no significant associations between the hOGG1 326Cys polymorphism and bladder cancer: GG vs. CC (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.85–1.40, p=0.480); GC vs. CC (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.85–1.28, p=0.662); GG+GC vs. CC (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.89–1.21, p=0.619); GG vs. GC+CC(OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.78–1.33, p=0.888); G vs. C (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.91–1.13, p=0.818). In the smoker population, no significant associations between the hOGG1 326Cys polymorphism and bladder cancer were observed for all the models. However, individuals carrying the hOGG1 Cys326Cys genotype have increased risk for bladder cancer compared to those carrying the hOGG1 Ser326Ser genotype in the non-smoker Asian population. CONCLUSION: The hOGG1 326Cys polymorphisms aren't a risk factor for bladder cancer, especially in the smoker population. But GG genotype is a risk factor for bladder cancer to the non-smoker Asian population compared with CC genotype.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5066884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50668842016-10-20 The hOGG1 Ser326Cys gene polymorphism and susceptibility for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis Wenjuan, Cao Jianzhong, Lu Chong, Li Yanjun, Gao Keqing, Lu Hanzhang, Wang Zhiping, Wang Int Braz J Urol Review Article OBJECTIVE: To assess the susceptibility of the hOGG1 genetic polymorphism for bladder cancer and evaluate the impact of smoking exposure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Articles included in PubMed, Medline and Springer databases were retrieved using the following key words: “human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase”, “OGG”, “OGG1”, “hOGG1”, “genetic variation”, “polymorphism” , “bladder cancer”, and “bladder carcinoma” to Meta-analysis was performed to detect whether there were differences between the bladder cancer group and the control group about the distribution of genotypes of the hOGG1 gene. RESULTS: The results showed that there are no significant associations between the hOGG1 326Cys polymorphism and bladder cancer: GG vs. CC (OR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.85–1.40, p=0.480); GC vs. CC (OR: 1.05, 95% CI: 0.85–1.28, p=0.662); GG+GC vs. CC (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.89–1.21, p=0.619); GG vs. GC+CC(OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.78–1.33, p=0.888); G vs. C (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.91–1.13, p=0.818). In the smoker population, no significant associations between the hOGG1 326Cys polymorphism and bladder cancer were observed for all the models. However, individuals carrying the hOGG1 Cys326Cys genotype have increased risk for bladder cancer compared to those carrying the hOGG1 Ser326Ser genotype in the non-smoker Asian population. CONCLUSION: The hOGG1 326Cys polymorphisms aren't a risk factor for bladder cancer, especially in the smoker population. But GG genotype is a risk factor for bladder cancer to the non-smoker Asian population compared with CC genotype. Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5066884/ /pubmed/27583352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0446 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Wenjuan, Cao
Jianzhong, Lu
Chong, Li
Yanjun, Gao
Keqing, Lu
Hanzhang, Wang
Zhiping, Wang
The hOGG1 Ser326Cys gene polymorphism and susceptibility for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis
title The hOGG1 Ser326Cys gene polymorphism and susceptibility for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full The hOGG1 Ser326Cys gene polymorphism and susceptibility for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr The hOGG1 Ser326Cys gene polymorphism and susceptibility for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The hOGG1 Ser326Cys gene polymorphism and susceptibility for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis
title_short The hOGG1 Ser326Cys gene polymorphism and susceptibility for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis
title_sort hogg1 ser326cys gene polymorphism and susceptibility for bladder cancer: a meta-analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27583352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0446
work_keys_str_mv AT wenjuancao thehogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis
AT jianzhonglu thehogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis
AT chongli thehogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis
AT yanjungao thehogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis
AT keqinglu thehogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis
AT hanzhangwang thehogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis
AT zhipingwang thehogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis
AT wenjuancao hogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis
AT jianzhonglu hogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis
AT chongli hogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis
AT yanjungao hogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis
AT keqinglu hogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis
AT hanzhangwang hogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis
AT zhipingwang hogg1ser326cysgenepolymorphismandsusceptibilityforbladdercancerametaanalysis