Cargando…

Can Social Protection Improve Sustainable Development Goals for Adolescent Health?

BACKGROUND: The first policy action outlined in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is the implementation of national social protection systems. This study assesses whether social protection provision can impact 17 indicators of five key health-related SDG goals amongst adolescents in South Afr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cluver, Lucie D., Orkin, F. Mark, Meinck, Franziska, Boyes, Mark E., Yakubovich, Alexa R., Sherr, Lorraine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27749932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164808
_version_ 1782460567583195136
author Cluver, Lucie D.
Orkin, F. Mark
Meinck, Franziska
Boyes, Mark E.
Yakubovich, Alexa R.
Sherr, Lorraine
author_facet Cluver, Lucie D.
Orkin, F. Mark
Meinck, Franziska
Boyes, Mark E.
Yakubovich, Alexa R.
Sherr, Lorraine
author_sort Cluver, Lucie D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The first policy action outlined in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is the implementation of national social protection systems. This study assesses whether social protection provision can impact 17 indicators of five key health-related SDG goals amongst adolescents in South Africa. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal survey of adolescents (10–18 years) between 2009 and 2012. Census areas were randomly selected in two urban and two rural health districts in two South African provinces, including all homes with a resident adolescent. Household receipt of social protection in the form of ‘cash’ (economic provision) and ‘care’ (psychosocial support) social protection, and health-related indicators within five SDG goals were assessed. Gender-disaggregated analyses included multivariate logistic regression, testing for interactions between social protection and socio-demographic covariates, and marginal effects models. FINDINGS: Social protection was associated with significant adolescent risk reductions in 12 of 17 gender-disaggregated SDG indicators, spanning SDG 2 (hunger); SDG 3 (AIDS, tuberculosis, mental health and substance abuse); SDG 4 (educational access); SDG 5 (sexual exploitation, sexual and reproductive health); and SDG 16 (violence perpetration). For six of 17 indicators, combined cash plus care showed enhanced risk reduction effects. Two interactions showed that effects of care varied by poverty level for boys’ hunger and girls’ school dropout. For tuberculosis, and for boys’ sexual exploitation and girls’ mental health and violence perpetration, no effects were found and more targeted or creative means will be needed to reach adolescents on these challenging burdens. INTERPRETATION: National social protection systems are not a panacea, but findings suggest that they have multiple and synergistic positive associations with adolescent health outcomes. Such systems may help us rise to the challenges of health and sustainable development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5066949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50669492016-10-27 Can Social Protection Improve Sustainable Development Goals for Adolescent Health? Cluver, Lucie D. Orkin, F. Mark Meinck, Franziska Boyes, Mark E. Yakubovich, Alexa R. Sherr, Lorraine PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The first policy action outlined in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) is the implementation of national social protection systems. This study assesses whether social protection provision can impact 17 indicators of five key health-related SDG goals amongst adolescents in South Africa. METHODS: We conducted a longitudinal survey of adolescents (10–18 years) between 2009 and 2012. Census areas were randomly selected in two urban and two rural health districts in two South African provinces, including all homes with a resident adolescent. Household receipt of social protection in the form of ‘cash’ (economic provision) and ‘care’ (psychosocial support) social protection, and health-related indicators within five SDG goals were assessed. Gender-disaggregated analyses included multivariate logistic regression, testing for interactions between social protection and socio-demographic covariates, and marginal effects models. FINDINGS: Social protection was associated with significant adolescent risk reductions in 12 of 17 gender-disaggregated SDG indicators, spanning SDG 2 (hunger); SDG 3 (AIDS, tuberculosis, mental health and substance abuse); SDG 4 (educational access); SDG 5 (sexual exploitation, sexual and reproductive health); and SDG 16 (violence perpetration). For six of 17 indicators, combined cash plus care showed enhanced risk reduction effects. Two interactions showed that effects of care varied by poverty level for boys’ hunger and girls’ school dropout. For tuberculosis, and for boys’ sexual exploitation and girls’ mental health and violence perpetration, no effects were found and more targeted or creative means will be needed to reach adolescents on these challenging burdens. INTERPRETATION: National social protection systems are not a panacea, but findings suggest that they have multiple and synergistic positive associations with adolescent health outcomes. Such systems may help us rise to the challenges of health and sustainable development. Public Library of Science 2016-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5066949/ /pubmed/27749932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164808 Text en © 2016 Cluver et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cluver, Lucie D.
Orkin, F. Mark
Meinck, Franziska
Boyes, Mark E.
Yakubovich, Alexa R.
Sherr, Lorraine
Can Social Protection Improve Sustainable Development Goals for Adolescent Health?
title Can Social Protection Improve Sustainable Development Goals for Adolescent Health?
title_full Can Social Protection Improve Sustainable Development Goals for Adolescent Health?
title_fullStr Can Social Protection Improve Sustainable Development Goals for Adolescent Health?
title_full_unstemmed Can Social Protection Improve Sustainable Development Goals for Adolescent Health?
title_short Can Social Protection Improve Sustainable Development Goals for Adolescent Health?
title_sort can social protection improve sustainable development goals for adolescent health?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5066949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27749932
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164808
work_keys_str_mv AT cluverlucied cansocialprotectionimprovesustainabledevelopmentgoalsforadolescenthealth
AT orkinfmark cansocialprotectionimprovesustainabledevelopmentgoalsforadolescenthealth
AT meinckfranziska cansocialprotectionimprovesustainabledevelopmentgoalsforadolescenthealth
AT boyesmarke cansocialprotectionimprovesustainabledevelopmentgoalsforadolescenthealth
AT yakubovichalexar cansocialprotectionimprovesustainabledevelopmentgoalsforadolescenthealth
AT sherrlorraine cansocialprotectionimprovesustainabledevelopmentgoalsforadolescenthealth