Cargando…

Local anesthesia for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrarectal local anesthestic (IRLA), periprostatic nerve block (PPNB), and the combined modalities in alleviating the pain during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literatur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Pu, Wang, Xiao-yan, Huang, Wei, Zhang, Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5067058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27785093
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S117451
_version_ 1782460586028695552
author Yan, Pu
Wang, Xiao-yan
Huang, Wei
Zhang, Yong
author_facet Yan, Pu
Wang, Xiao-yan
Huang, Wei
Zhang, Yong
author_sort Yan, Pu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrarectal local anesthestic (IRLA), periprostatic nerve block (PPNB), and the combined modalities in alleviating the pain during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about IRLA vs no anesthesia or placebo gel; PPNB vs no injection, periprostatic placebo injection, or IRLA; combined PPNB and IRLA vs PPNB alone; and combined PPNB and intraprostatic nerve block (IPNB) vs PPNB alone before TRUS-guided biopsy. Sources included MEDILINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from 1980 to 2016. The main outcomes were biopsy pain score, probe manipulation pain score, and anesthetic infiltration pain score assessed by the visual pain scale. RESULTS: A total of 26 articles involving 36 RCTs were used in this analysis: Although IRLA can lead to pain reduction, the result was not statistically significant when compared with no anesthesia or placebo gel (weighted mean difference [WMD]: −0.22, 95% CI: −0.45 to 0, P=0.06). PPNB can lead to significantly lower biopsy pain scores when compared with no analgesia (WMD: −1.32, 95% CI: −1.68 to −0.95, P<0.00001), placebo injection (WMD: −2.62, 95% CI: −3.16 to −2.07, P<0.00001), or IRLA (WMD: −1.31, 95% CI: −1.40 to −1.22, P<0.00001). PPNB + IRLA can lead to significantly lower biopsy pain scores when compared with PPNB alone (WMD: −0.45, 95% CI: −0.62 to −0.28, P<0.00001). PPNB + IPNB can lead to significantly lower biopsy pain scores when compared with PPNB alone (WMD: −0.73, 95% CI: −0.92 to −0.55, P<0.00001). There were no severe reported general or local complications related to local anesthesia. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicates that a combination of PPNB and IRLA/IPNB is effective and safe in alleviating the pain during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to validate this result.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5067058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50670582016-10-26 Local anesthesia for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yan, Pu Wang, Xiao-yan Huang, Wei Zhang, Yong J Pain Res Original Research BACKGROUND: A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrarectal local anesthestic (IRLA), periprostatic nerve block (PPNB), and the combined modalities in alleviating the pain during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review was performed to identify all published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about IRLA vs no anesthesia or placebo gel; PPNB vs no injection, periprostatic placebo injection, or IRLA; combined PPNB and IRLA vs PPNB alone; and combined PPNB and intraprostatic nerve block (IPNB) vs PPNB alone before TRUS-guided biopsy. Sources included MEDILINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from 1980 to 2016. The main outcomes were biopsy pain score, probe manipulation pain score, and anesthetic infiltration pain score assessed by the visual pain scale. RESULTS: A total of 26 articles involving 36 RCTs were used in this analysis: Although IRLA can lead to pain reduction, the result was not statistically significant when compared with no anesthesia or placebo gel (weighted mean difference [WMD]: −0.22, 95% CI: −0.45 to 0, P=0.06). PPNB can lead to significantly lower biopsy pain scores when compared with no analgesia (WMD: −1.32, 95% CI: −1.68 to −0.95, P<0.00001), placebo injection (WMD: −2.62, 95% CI: −3.16 to −2.07, P<0.00001), or IRLA (WMD: −1.31, 95% CI: −1.40 to −1.22, P<0.00001). PPNB + IRLA can lead to significantly lower biopsy pain scores when compared with PPNB alone (WMD: −0.45, 95% CI: −0.62 to −0.28, P<0.00001). PPNB + IPNB can lead to significantly lower biopsy pain scores when compared with PPNB alone (WMD: −0.73, 95% CI: −0.92 to −0.55, P<0.00001). There were no severe reported general or local complications related to local anesthesia. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis indicates that a combination of PPNB and IRLA/IPNB is effective and safe in alleviating the pain during TRUS-guided prostate biopsy. Further high-quality RCTs are needed to validate this result. Dove Medical Press 2016-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5067058/ /pubmed/27785093 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S117451 Text en © 2016 Yan et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Yan, Pu
Wang, Xiao-yan
Huang, Wei
Zhang, Yong
Local anesthesia for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Local anesthesia for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Local anesthesia for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Local anesthesia for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Local anesthesia for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Local anesthesia for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort local anesthesia for pain control during transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5067058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27785093
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S117451
work_keys_str_mv AT yanpu localanesthesiaforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangxiaoyan localanesthesiaforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangwei localanesthesiaforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyong localanesthesiaforpaincontrolduringtransrectalultrasoundguidedprostatebiopsyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis