Cargando…

Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT

This study sought to compare the image quality and radiation dose of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) from prospectively triggered 128-slice CT (128-MSCT) versus dual-source 64-slice CT (DSCT). The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee at Tongji Medical College of Huazhon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gu, Jin, Shi, He-shui, Han, Ping, Yu, Jie, Ma, Gui-na, Wu, Sheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5067634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34795
_version_ 1782460679965376512
author Gu, Jin
Shi, He-shui
Han, Ping
Yu, Jie
Ma, Gui-na
Wu, Sheng
author_facet Gu, Jin
Shi, He-shui
Han, Ping
Yu, Jie
Ma, Gui-na
Wu, Sheng
author_sort Gu, Jin
collection PubMed
description This study sought to compare the image quality and radiation dose of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) from prospectively triggered 128-slice CT (128-MSCT) versus dual-source 64-slice CT (DSCT). The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee at Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Eighty consecutive patients with stable heart rates lower than 70 bpm were enrolled. Forty patients were scanned with 128-MSCT, and the other 40 patients were scanned with DSCT. Two radiologists independently assessed the image quality in segments (diameter >1 mm) according to a three-point scale (1: excellent; 2: moderate; 3: insufficient). The CCTA radiation dose was calculated. Eighty patients with 526 segments in the 128-MSCT group and 544 segments in the DSCT group were evaluated. The image quality 1, 2 and 3 scores were 91.6%, 6.9% and 1.5%, respectively, for the 128-MSCT group and 97.6%, 1.7% and 0.7%, respectively, for the DSCT group, and there was a statistically significant inter-group difference (P ≤ 0.001). The effective doses were 3.0 mSv in the 128-MSCT group and 4.5 mSv in the DSCT group (P ≤ 0.001). Compared with DSCT, CCTA with prospectively triggered 128-MSCT had adequate image quality and a 33.3% lower radiation dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5067634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50676342016-10-26 Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT Gu, Jin Shi, He-shui Han, Ping Yu, Jie Ma, Gui-na Wu, Sheng Sci Rep Article This study sought to compare the image quality and radiation dose of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) from prospectively triggered 128-slice CT (128-MSCT) versus dual-source 64-slice CT (DSCT). The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee at Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Eighty consecutive patients with stable heart rates lower than 70 bpm were enrolled. Forty patients were scanned with 128-MSCT, and the other 40 patients were scanned with DSCT. Two radiologists independently assessed the image quality in segments (diameter >1 mm) according to a three-point scale (1: excellent; 2: moderate; 3: insufficient). The CCTA radiation dose was calculated. Eighty patients with 526 segments in the 128-MSCT group and 544 segments in the DSCT group were evaluated. The image quality 1, 2 and 3 scores were 91.6%, 6.9% and 1.5%, respectively, for the 128-MSCT group and 97.6%, 1.7% and 0.7%, respectively, for the DSCT group, and there was a statistically significant inter-group difference (P ≤ 0.001). The effective doses were 3.0 mSv in the 128-MSCT group and 4.5 mSv in the DSCT group (P ≤ 0.001). Compared with DSCT, CCTA with prospectively triggered 128-MSCT had adequate image quality and a 33.3% lower radiation dose. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5067634/ /pubmed/27752040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34795 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Gu, Jin
Shi, He-shui
Han, Ping
Yu, Jie
Ma, Gui-na
Wu, Sheng
Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT
title Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT
title_full Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT
title_fullStr Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT
title_full_unstemmed Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT
title_short Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT
title_sort image quality and radiation dose for prospectively triggered coronary ct angiography: 128-slice single-source ct versus first-generation 64-slice dual-source ct
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5067634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34795
work_keys_str_mv AT gujin imagequalityandradiationdoseforprospectivelytriggeredcoronaryctangiography128slicesinglesourcectversusfirstgeneration64slicedualsourcect
AT shiheshui imagequalityandradiationdoseforprospectivelytriggeredcoronaryctangiography128slicesinglesourcectversusfirstgeneration64slicedualsourcect
AT hanping imagequalityandradiationdoseforprospectivelytriggeredcoronaryctangiography128slicesinglesourcectversusfirstgeneration64slicedualsourcect
AT yujie imagequalityandradiationdoseforprospectivelytriggeredcoronaryctangiography128slicesinglesourcectversusfirstgeneration64slicedualsourcect
AT maguina imagequalityandradiationdoseforprospectivelytriggeredcoronaryctangiography128slicesinglesourcectversusfirstgeneration64slicedualsourcect
AT wusheng imagequalityandradiationdoseforprospectivelytriggeredcoronaryctangiography128slicesinglesourcectversusfirstgeneration64slicedualsourcect