Cargando…
Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT
This study sought to compare the image quality and radiation dose of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) from prospectively triggered 128-slice CT (128-MSCT) versus dual-source 64-slice CT (DSCT). The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee at Tongji Medical College of Huazhon...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5067634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34795 |
_version_ | 1782460679965376512 |
---|---|
author | Gu, Jin Shi, He-shui Han, Ping Yu, Jie Ma, Gui-na Wu, Sheng |
author_facet | Gu, Jin Shi, He-shui Han, Ping Yu, Jie Ma, Gui-na Wu, Sheng |
author_sort | Gu, Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study sought to compare the image quality and radiation dose of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) from prospectively triggered 128-slice CT (128-MSCT) versus dual-source 64-slice CT (DSCT). The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee at Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Eighty consecutive patients with stable heart rates lower than 70 bpm were enrolled. Forty patients were scanned with 128-MSCT, and the other 40 patients were scanned with DSCT. Two radiologists independently assessed the image quality in segments (diameter >1 mm) according to a three-point scale (1: excellent; 2: moderate; 3: insufficient). The CCTA radiation dose was calculated. Eighty patients with 526 segments in the 128-MSCT group and 544 segments in the DSCT group were evaluated. The image quality 1, 2 and 3 scores were 91.6%, 6.9% and 1.5%, respectively, for the 128-MSCT group and 97.6%, 1.7% and 0.7%, respectively, for the DSCT group, and there was a statistically significant inter-group difference (P ≤ 0.001). The effective doses were 3.0 mSv in the 128-MSCT group and 4.5 mSv in the DSCT group (P ≤ 0.001). Compared with DSCT, CCTA with prospectively triggered 128-MSCT had adequate image quality and a 33.3% lower radiation dose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5067634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50676342016-10-26 Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT Gu, Jin Shi, He-shui Han, Ping Yu, Jie Ma, Gui-na Wu, Sheng Sci Rep Article This study sought to compare the image quality and radiation dose of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) from prospectively triggered 128-slice CT (128-MSCT) versus dual-source 64-slice CT (DSCT). The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee at Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Eighty consecutive patients with stable heart rates lower than 70 bpm were enrolled. Forty patients were scanned with 128-MSCT, and the other 40 patients were scanned with DSCT. Two radiologists independently assessed the image quality in segments (diameter >1 mm) according to a three-point scale (1: excellent; 2: moderate; 3: insufficient). The CCTA radiation dose was calculated. Eighty patients with 526 segments in the 128-MSCT group and 544 segments in the DSCT group were evaluated. The image quality 1, 2 and 3 scores were 91.6%, 6.9% and 1.5%, respectively, for the 128-MSCT group and 97.6%, 1.7% and 0.7%, respectively, for the DSCT group, and there was a statistically significant inter-group difference (P ≤ 0.001). The effective doses were 3.0 mSv in the 128-MSCT group and 4.5 mSv in the DSCT group (P ≤ 0.001). Compared with DSCT, CCTA with prospectively triggered 128-MSCT had adequate image quality and a 33.3% lower radiation dose. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5067634/ /pubmed/27752040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34795 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Gu, Jin Shi, He-shui Han, Ping Yu, Jie Ma, Gui-na Wu, Sheng Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT |
title | Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT |
title_full | Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT |
title_fullStr | Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT |
title_full_unstemmed | Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT |
title_short | Image Quality and Radiation Dose for Prospectively Triggered Coronary CT Angiography: 128-Slice Single-Source CT versus First-Generation 64-Slice Dual-Source CT |
title_sort | image quality and radiation dose for prospectively triggered coronary ct angiography: 128-slice single-source ct versus first-generation 64-slice dual-source ct |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5067634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27752040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34795 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gujin imagequalityandradiationdoseforprospectivelytriggeredcoronaryctangiography128slicesinglesourcectversusfirstgeneration64slicedualsourcect AT shiheshui imagequalityandradiationdoseforprospectivelytriggeredcoronaryctangiography128slicesinglesourcectversusfirstgeneration64slicedualsourcect AT hanping imagequalityandradiationdoseforprospectivelytriggeredcoronaryctangiography128slicesinglesourcectversusfirstgeneration64slicedualsourcect AT yujie imagequalityandradiationdoseforprospectivelytriggeredcoronaryctangiography128slicesinglesourcectversusfirstgeneration64slicedualsourcect AT maguina imagequalityandradiationdoseforprospectivelytriggeredcoronaryctangiography128slicesinglesourcectversusfirstgeneration64slicedualsourcect AT wusheng imagequalityandradiationdoseforprospectivelytriggeredcoronaryctangiography128slicesinglesourcectversusfirstgeneration64slicedualsourcect |