Cargando…

In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus)

BACKGROUND: Almonds contain considerable amounts of potential prebiotic components, and the roasting process may alter these components. The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro fermentation properties and in vivo prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds. RESULTS: In vitro, predigested r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Zhibin, Wang, Wei, Huang, Guangwei, Zhang, Wen, Ni, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5067696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7604
_version_ 1782460693529755648
author Liu, Zhibin
Wang, Wei
Huang, Guangwei
Zhang, Wen
Ni, Li
author_facet Liu, Zhibin
Wang, Wei
Huang, Guangwei
Zhang, Wen
Ni, Li
author_sort Liu, Zhibin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Almonds contain considerable amounts of potential prebiotic components, and the roasting process may alter these components. The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro fermentation properties and in vivo prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds. RESULTS: In vitro, predigested raw and roasted almonds promoted the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus (La‐14) and Bifidobacterium breve (JCM 1192), and no significant differences were found between these two nuts. In a 4‐week animal trial, daily intake of raw or roasted almonds promoted the population of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. and inhibited the growth of Enterococcus spp. in faeces and caecal contains of rats. Compared with roasted almonds, raw almonds had a greater bifidobacteria promotion effect. Besides, significantly higher β‐galactosidase activity and lower β‐glucuronidase and azoreductase activities in faeces or caecal contents of rats were observed with raw almonds than with roasted almonds. While, in terms of metabolic effects, the ingestion of roasted almonds resulted in significantly greater intestinal lipase activities. CONCLUSION: Both raw and roasted almonds exhibit potential prebiotic effects, including regulation of intestinal bacteria and improved metabolic activities. The roasting process may slightly reduce the prebiotic effects of almonds but significantly improve the metabolic effects.© 2016 The Authors. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5067696
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50676962016-11-01 In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus) Liu, Zhibin Wang, Wei Huang, Guangwei Zhang, Wen Ni, Li J Sci Food Agric Research Articles BACKGROUND: Almonds contain considerable amounts of potential prebiotic components, and the roasting process may alter these components. The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro fermentation properties and in vivo prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds. RESULTS: In vitro, predigested raw and roasted almonds promoted the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus (La‐14) and Bifidobacterium breve (JCM 1192), and no significant differences were found between these two nuts. In a 4‐week animal trial, daily intake of raw or roasted almonds promoted the population of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. and inhibited the growth of Enterococcus spp. in faeces and caecal contains of rats. Compared with roasted almonds, raw almonds had a greater bifidobacteria promotion effect. Besides, significantly higher β‐galactosidase activity and lower β‐glucuronidase and azoreductase activities in faeces or caecal contents of rats were observed with raw almonds than with roasted almonds. While, in terms of metabolic effects, the ingestion of roasted almonds resulted in significantly greater intestinal lipase activities. CONCLUSION: Both raw and roasted almonds exhibit potential prebiotic effects, including regulation of intestinal bacteria and improved metabolic activities. The roasting process may slightly reduce the prebiotic effects of almonds but significantly improve the metabolic effects.© 2016 The Authors. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2016-02-16 2016-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5067696/ /pubmed/26749248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7604 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Liu, Zhibin
Wang, Wei
Huang, Guangwei
Zhang, Wen
Ni, Li
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus)
title In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus)
title_full In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus)
title_fullStr In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus)
title_full_unstemmed In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus)
title_short In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus)
title_sort in vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (prunus amygdalus)
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5067696/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7604
work_keys_str_mv AT liuzhibin invitroandinvivoevaluationoftheprebioticeffectofrawandroastedalmondsprunusamygdalus
AT wangwei invitroandinvivoevaluationoftheprebioticeffectofrawandroastedalmondsprunusamygdalus
AT huangguangwei invitroandinvivoevaluationoftheprebioticeffectofrawandroastedalmondsprunusamygdalus
AT zhangwen invitroandinvivoevaluationoftheprebioticeffectofrawandroastedalmondsprunusamygdalus
AT nili invitroandinvivoevaluationoftheprebioticeffectofrawandroastedalmondsprunusamygdalus