Cargando…
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus)
BACKGROUND: Almonds contain considerable amounts of potential prebiotic components, and the roasting process may alter these components. The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro fermentation properties and in vivo prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds. RESULTS: In vitro, predigested r...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5067696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7604 |
_version_ | 1782460693529755648 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Zhibin Wang, Wei Huang, Guangwei Zhang, Wen Ni, Li |
author_facet | Liu, Zhibin Wang, Wei Huang, Guangwei Zhang, Wen Ni, Li |
author_sort | Liu, Zhibin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Almonds contain considerable amounts of potential prebiotic components, and the roasting process may alter these components. The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro fermentation properties and in vivo prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds. RESULTS: In vitro, predigested raw and roasted almonds promoted the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus (La‐14) and Bifidobacterium breve (JCM 1192), and no significant differences were found between these two nuts. In a 4‐week animal trial, daily intake of raw or roasted almonds promoted the population of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. and inhibited the growth of Enterococcus spp. in faeces and caecal contains of rats. Compared with roasted almonds, raw almonds had a greater bifidobacteria promotion effect. Besides, significantly higher β‐galactosidase activity and lower β‐glucuronidase and azoreductase activities in faeces or caecal contents of rats were observed with raw almonds than with roasted almonds. While, in terms of metabolic effects, the ingestion of roasted almonds resulted in significantly greater intestinal lipase activities. CONCLUSION: Both raw and roasted almonds exhibit potential prebiotic effects, including regulation of intestinal bacteria and improved metabolic activities. The roasting process may slightly reduce the prebiotic effects of almonds but significantly improve the metabolic effects.© 2016 The Authors. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5067696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50676962016-11-01 In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus) Liu, Zhibin Wang, Wei Huang, Guangwei Zhang, Wen Ni, Li J Sci Food Agric Research Articles BACKGROUND: Almonds contain considerable amounts of potential prebiotic components, and the roasting process may alter these components. The aim of this study was to compare the in vitro fermentation properties and in vivo prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds. RESULTS: In vitro, predigested raw and roasted almonds promoted the growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus (La‐14) and Bifidobacterium breve (JCM 1192), and no significant differences were found between these two nuts. In a 4‐week animal trial, daily intake of raw or roasted almonds promoted the population of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. and inhibited the growth of Enterococcus spp. in faeces and caecal contains of rats. Compared with roasted almonds, raw almonds had a greater bifidobacteria promotion effect. Besides, significantly higher β‐galactosidase activity and lower β‐glucuronidase and azoreductase activities in faeces or caecal contents of rats were observed with raw almonds than with roasted almonds. While, in terms of metabolic effects, the ingestion of roasted almonds resulted in significantly greater intestinal lipase activities. CONCLUSION: Both raw and roasted almonds exhibit potential prebiotic effects, including regulation of intestinal bacteria and improved metabolic activities. The roasting process may slightly reduce the prebiotic effects of almonds but significantly improve the metabolic effects.© 2016 The Authors. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2016-02-16 2016-03-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5067696/ /pubmed/26749248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7604 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Liu, Zhibin Wang, Wei Huang, Guangwei Zhang, Wen Ni, Li In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus) |
title |
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus) |
title_full |
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus) |
title_fullStr |
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus) |
title_full_unstemmed |
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus) |
title_short |
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (Prunus amygdalus) |
title_sort | in vitro and in vivo evaluation of the prebiotic effect of raw and roasted almonds (prunus amygdalus) |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5067696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26749248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7604 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuzhibin invitroandinvivoevaluationoftheprebioticeffectofrawandroastedalmondsprunusamygdalus AT wangwei invitroandinvivoevaluationoftheprebioticeffectofrawandroastedalmondsprunusamygdalus AT huangguangwei invitroandinvivoevaluationoftheprebioticeffectofrawandroastedalmondsprunusamygdalus AT zhangwen invitroandinvivoevaluationoftheprebioticeffectofrawandroastedalmondsprunusamygdalus AT nili invitroandinvivoevaluationoftheprebioticeffectofrawandroastedalmondsprunusamygdalus |