Cargando…

Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement

BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets (COS) can enhance the relevance of research by ensuring that outcomes of importance to health service users and other people making choices about health care in a particular topic area are measured routinely. Over 200 COS to date have been developed, but the clarity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kirkham, Jamie J., Gorst, Sarah, Altman, Douglas G., Blazeby, Jane M., Clarke, Mike, Devane, Declan, Gargon, Elizabeth, Moher, David, Schmitt, Jochen, Tugwell, Peter, Tunis, Sean, Williamson, Paula R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5068732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27755541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002148
_version_ 1782460831001214976
author Kirkham, Jamie J.
Gorst, Sarah
Altman, Douglas G.
Blazeby, Jane M.
Clarke, Mike
Devane, Declan
Gargon, Elizabeth
Moher, David
Schmitt, Jochen
Tugwell, Peter
Tunis, Sean
Williamson, Paula R.
author_facet Kirkham, Jamie J.
Gorst, Sarah
Altman, Douglas G.
Blazeby, Jane M.
Clarke, Mike
Devane, Declan
Gargon, Elizabeth
Moher, David
Schmitt, Jochen
Tugwell, Peter
Tunis, Sean
Williamson, Paula R.
author_sort Kirkham, Jamie J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets (COS) can enhance the relevance of research by ensuring that outcomes of importance to health service users and other people making choices about health care in a particular topic area are measured routinely. Over 200 COS to date have been developed, but the clarity of these reports is suboptimal. COS studies will not achieve their goal if reports of COS are not complete and transparent. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In recognition of these issues, an international group that included experienced COS developers, methodologists, journal editors, potential users of COS (clinical trialists, systematic reviewers, and clinical guideline developers), and patient representatives developed the Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting (COS-STAR) Statement as a reporting guideline for COS studies. The developmental process consisted of an initial reporting item generation stage and a two-round Delphi survey involving nearly 200 participants representing key stakeholder groups, followed by a consensus meeting. The COS-STAR Statement consists of a checklist of 18 items considered essential for transparent and complete reporting in all COS studies. The checklist items focus on the introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of a manuscript describing the development of a particular COS. A limitation of the COS-STAR Statement is that it was developed without representative views of low- and middle-income countries. COS have equal relevance to studies conducted in these areas, and, subsequently, this guideline may need to evolve over time to encompass any additional challenges from developing COS in these areas. CONCLUSIONS: With many ongoing COS studies underway, the COS-STAR Statement should be a helpful resource to improve the reporting of COS studies for the benefit of all COS users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5068732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50687322016-10-27 Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement Kirkham, Jamie J. Gorst, Sarah Altman, Douglas G. Blazeby, Jane M. Clarke, Mike Devane, Declan Gargon, Elizabeth Moher, David Schmitt, Jochen Tugwell, Peter Tunis, Sean Williamson, Paula R. PLoS Med Guidelines and Guidance BACKGROUND: Core outcome sets (COS) can enhance the relevance of research by ensuring that outcomes of importance to health service users and other people making choices about health care in a particular topic area are measured routinely. Over 200 COS to date have been developed, but the clarity of these reports is suboptimal. COS studies will not achieve their goal if reports of COS are not complete and transparent. METHODS AND FINDINGS: In recognition of these issues, an international group that included experienced COS developers, methodologists, journal editors, potential users of COS (clinical trialists, systematic reviewers, and clinical guideline developers), and patient representatives developed the Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting (COS-STAR) Statement as a reporting guideline for COS studies. The developmental process consisted of an initial reporting item generation stage and a two-round Delphi survey involving nearly 200 participants representing key stakeholder groups, followed by a consensus meeting. The COS-STAR Statement consists of a checklist of 18 items considered essential for transparent and complete reporting in all COS studies. The checklist items focus on the introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of a manuscript describing the development of a particular COS. A limitation of the COS-STAR Statement is that it was developed without representative views of low- and middle-income countries. COS have equal relevance to studies conducted in these areas, and, subsequently, this guideline may need to evolve over time to encompass any additional challenges from developing COS in these areas. CONCLUSIONS: With many ongoing COS studies underway, the COS-STAR Statement should be a helpful resource to improve the reporting of COS studies for the benefit of all COS users. Public Library of Science 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5068732/ /pubmed/27755541 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002148 Text en © 2016 Kirkham et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Guidelines and Guidance
Kirkham, Jamie J.
Gorst, Sarah
Altman, Douglas G.
Blazeby, Jane M.
Clarke, Mike
Devane, Declan
Gargon, Elizabeth
Moher, David
Schmitt, Jochen
Tugwell, Peter
Tunis, Sean
Williamson, Paula R.
Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
title Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
title_full Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
title_fullStr Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
title_full_unstemmed Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
title_short Core Outcome Set–STAndards for Reporting: The COS-STAR Statement
title_sort core outcome set–standards for reporting: the cos-star statement
topic Guidelines and Guidance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5068732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27755541
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002148
work_keys_str_mv AT kirkhamjamiej coreoutcomesetstandardsforreportingthecosstarstatement
AT gorstsarah coreoutcomesetstandardsforreportingthecosstarstatement
AT altmandouglasg coreoutcomesetstandardsforreportingthecosstarstatement
AT blazebyjanem coreoutcomesetstandardsforreportingthecosstarstatement
AT clarkemike coreoutcomesetstandardsforreportingthecosstarstatement
AT devanedeclan coreoutcomesetstandardsforreportingthecosstarstatement
AT gargonelizabeth coreoutcomesetstandardsforreportingthecosstarstatement
AT moherdavid coreoutcomesetstandardsforreportingthecosstarstatement
AT schmittjochen coreoutcomesetstandardsforreportingthecosstarstatement
AT tugwellpeter coreoutcomesetstandardsforreportingthecosstarstatement
AT tunissean coreoutcomesetstandardsforreportingthecosstarstatement
AT williamsonpaular coreoutcomesetstandardsforreportingthecosstarstatement