Cargando…

Cross-Validation Without Doing Cross-Validation in Genome-Enabled Prediction

Cross-validation of methods is an essential component of genome-enabled prediction of complex traits. We develop formulae for computing the predictions that would be obtained when one or several cases are removed in the training process, to become members of testing sets, but by running the model us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gianola, Daniel, Schön, Chris-Carolin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Genetics Society of America 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5068934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27489209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.033381
_version_ 1782460866392752128
author Gianola, Daniel
Schön, Chris-Carolin
author_facet Gianola, Daniel
Schön, Chris-Carolin
author_sort Gianola, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Cross-validation of methods is an essential component of genome-enabled prediction of complex traits. We develop formulae for computing the predictions that would be obtained when one or several cases are removed in the training process, to become members of testing sets, but by running the model using all observations only once. Prediction methods to which the developments apply include least squares, best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) of markers, or genomic BLUP, reproducing kernels Hilbert spaces regression with single or multiple kernel matrices, and any member of a suite of linear regression methods known as “Bayesian alphabet.” The approach used for Bayesian models is based on importance sampling of posterior draws. Proof of concept is provided by applying the formulae to a wheat data set representing 599 inbred lines genotyped for 1279 markers, and the target trait was grain yield. The data set was used to evaluate predictive mean-squared error, impact of alternative layouts on maximum likelihood estimates of regularization parameters, model complexity, and residual degrees of freedom stemming from various strengths of regularization, as well as two forms of importance sampling. Our results will facilitate carrying out extensive cross-validation without model retraining for most machines employed in genome-assisted prediction of quantitative traits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5068934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Genetics Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50689342016-10-24 Cross-Validation Without Doing Cross-Validation in Genome-Enabled Prediction Gianola, Daniel Schön, Chris-Carolin G3 (Bethesda) Genomic Selection Cross-validation of methods is an essential component of genome-enabled prediction of complex traits. We develop formulae for computing the predictions that would be obtained when one or several cases are removed in the training process, to become members of testing sets, but by running the model using all observations only once. Prediction methods to which the developments apply include least squares, best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) of markers, or genomic BLUP, reproducing kernels Hilbert spaces regression with single or multiple kernel matrices, and any member of a suite of linear regression methods known as “Bayesian alphabet.” The approach used for Bayesian models is based on importance sampling of posterior draws. Proof of concept is provided by applying the formulae to a wheat data set representing 599 inbred lines genotyped for 1279 markers, and the target trait was grain yield. The data set was used to evaluate predictive mean-squared error, impact of alternative layouts on maximum likelihood estimates of regularization parameters, model complexity, and residual degrees of freedom stemming from various strengths of regularization, as well as two forms of importance sampling. Our results will facilitate carrying out extensive cross-validation without model retraining for most machines employed in genome-assisted prediction of quantitative traits. Genetics Society of America 2016-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5068934/ /pubmed/27489209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.033381 Text en Copyright © 2016 Gianola and Schon http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Genomic Selection
Gianola, Daniel
Schön, Chris-Carolin
Cross-Validation Without Doing Cross-Validation in Genome-Enabled Prediction
title Cross-Validation Without Doing Cross-Validation in Genome-Enabled Prediction
title_full Cross-Validation Without Doing Cross-Validation in Genome-Enabled Prediction
title_fullStr Cross-Validation Without Doing Cross-Validation in Genome-Enabled Prediction
title_full_unstemmed Cross-Validation Without Doing Cross-Validation in Genome-Enabled Prediction
title_short Cross-Validation Without Doing Cross-Validation in Genome-Enabled Prediction
title_sort cross-validation without doing cross-validation in genome-enabled prediction
topic Genomic Selection
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5068934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27489209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.116.033381
work_keys_str_mv AT gianoladaniel crossvalidationwithoutdoingcrossvalidationingenomeenabledprediction
AT schonchriscarolin crossvalidationwithoutdoingcrossvalidationingenomeenabledprediction