Cargando…

Risk factors for human Leptospira seropositivity in South Germany

We analyzed risk factors for Leptospira seropositivity in humans, using data from a population-based cross-sectional zoonosis survey in South Germany (2008/9). Out of 1007 participants 42 (4.2 %) were sero-positive (19/446 men; 23/561 women), indicating that Leptospira exposure and sero-conversion i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brockmann, Stefan O., Ulrich, Lena, Piechotowski, Isolde, Wagner-Wiening, Christiane, Nöckler, Karsten, Mayer-Scholl, Anne, Eichner, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27803844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3483-8
_version_ 1782460894715838464
author Brockmann, Stefan O.
Ulrich, Lena
Piechotowski, Isolde
Wagner-Wiening, Christiane
Nöckler, Karsten
Mayer-Scholl, Anne
Eichner, Martin
author_facet Brockmann, Stefan O.
Ulrich, Lena
Piechotowski, Isolde
Wagner-Wiening, Christiane
Nöckler, Karsten
Mayer-Scholl, Anne
Eichner, Martin
author_sort Brockmann, Stefan O.
collection PubMed
description We analyzed risk factors for Leptospira seropositivity in humans, using data from a population-based cross-sectional zoonosis survey in South Germany (2008/9). Out of 1007 participants 42 (4.2 %) were sero-positive (19/446 men; 23/561 women), indicating that Leptospira exposure and sero-conversion is much more frequent than commonly assumed. Relative risks (RR) for seropositivity with exact 95 % confidence intervals (CI; adjusted for specificity and sensitivity of the ELISA test) were calculated for various exposure factors. Contact with pet rats (RR = 13.9 CI [4.8; 25.3]), guinea pigs (3.0[1.1; 7.4]), cattle (3.7[1.3; 9.6]), poultry (3.6[1.3; 8.6]) or livestock (2.3[1.1; 4.9]) as well as occupation as forestry worker (9.2[2.6; 21.4]) were identified as important exposure factors. None of the participants has ever been diagnosed with leptospirosis, yet 45 had experienced symptoms which may have been caused by Leptospira infection (12 with scleral icterus, 25 dark urine, 8 liver inflammation, 7 kidney failure). Three times as many participants with prior symptoms were seropositive as participants without symptoms (RR = 3.4[1.3; 8.3]), suggesting that sero-positive patients with severe symptoms may frequently not be diagnosed as leptospirosis cases. Physicians should consider leptospirosis as a differential diagnosis. Currently, the vast majority of symptomatic leptospirosis patients may neither be diagnosed nor reported.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5069215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50692152016-11-01 Risk factors for human Leptospira seropositivity in South Germany Brockmann, Stefan O. Ulrich, Lena Piechotowski, Isolde Wagner-Wiening, Christiane Nöckler, Karsten Mayer-Scholl, Anne Eichner, Martin Springerplus Research We analyzed risk factors for Leptospira seropositivity in humans, using data from a population-based cross-sectional zoonosis survey in South Germany (2008/9). Out of 1007 participants 42 (4.2 %) were sero-positive (19/446 men; 23/561 women), indicating that Leptospira exposure and sero-conversion is much more frequent than commonly assumed. Relative risks (RR) for seropositivity with exact 95 % confidence intervals (CI; adjusted for specificity and sensitivity of the ELISA test) were calculated for various exposure factors. Contact with pet rats (RR = 13.9 CI [4.8; 25.3]), guinea pigs (3.0[1.1; 7.4]), cattle (3.7[1.3; 9.6]), poultry (3.6[1.3; 8.6]) or livestock (2.3[1.1; 4.9]) as well as occupation as forestry worker (9.2[2.6; 21.4]) were identified as important exposure factors. None of the participants has ever been diagnosed with leptospirosis, yet 45 had experienced symptoms which may have been caused by Leptospira infection (12 with scleral icterus, 25 dark urine, 8 liver inflammation, 7 kidney failure). Three times as many participants with prior symptoms were seropositive as participants without symptoms (RR = 3.4[1.3; 8.3]), suggesting that sero-positive patients with severe symptoms may frequently not be diagnosed as leptospirosis cases. Physicians should consider leptospirosis as a differential diagnosis. Currently, the vast majority of symptomatic leptospirosis patients may neither be diagnosed nor reported. Springer International Publishing 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5069215/ /pubmed/27803844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3483-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Brockmann, Stefan O.
Ulrich, Lena
Piechotowski, Isolde
Wagner-Wiening, Christiane
Nöckler, Karsten
Mayer-Scholl, Anne
Eichner, Martin
Risk factors for human Leptospira seropositivity in South Germany
title Risk factors for human Leptospira seropositivity in South Germany
title_full Risk factors for human Leptospira seropositivity in South Germany
title_fullStr Risk factors for human Leptospira seropositivity in South Germany
title_full_unstemmed Risk factors for human Leptospira seropositivity in South Germany
title_short Risk factors for human Leptospira seropositivity in South Germany
title_sort risk factors for human leptospira seropositivity in south germany
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27803844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-3483-8
work_keys_str_mv AT brockmannstefano riskfactorsforhumanleptospiraseropositivityinsouthgermany
AT ulrichlena riskfactorsforhumanleptospiraseropositivityinsouthgermany
AT piechotowskiisolde riskfactorsforhumanleptospiraseropositivityinsouthgermany
AT wagnerwieningchristiane riskfactorsforhumanleptospiraseropositivityinsouthgermany
AT nocklerkarsten riskfactorsforhumanleptospiraseropositivityinsouthgermany
AT mayerschollanne riskfactorsforhumanleptospiraseropositivityinsouthgermany
AT eichnermartin riskfactorsforhumanleptospiraseropositivityinsouthgermany