Cargando…
Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi
A combined increase in seawater [CO(2)] and [H(+)] was recently shown to induce a shift from photosynthetic HCO(3) (−) to CO(2) uptake in Emiliania huxleyi. This shift occurred within minutes, whereas acclimation to ocean acidification (OA) did not affect the carbon source. To identify the driver of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13885 |
_version_ | 1782460974220967936 |
---|---|
author | Kottmeier, Dorothee M. Rokitta, Sebastian D. Rost, Björn |
author_facet | Kottmeier, Dorothee M. Rokitta, Sebastian D. Rost, Björn |
author_sort | Kottmeier, Dorothee M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A combined increase in seawater [CO(2)] and [H(+)] was recently shown to induce a shift from photosynthetic HCO(3) (−) to CO(2) uptake in Emiliania huxleyi. This shift occurred within minutes, whereas acclimation to ocean acidification (OA) did not affect the carbon source. To identify the driver of this shift, we exposed low‐ and high‐light acclimated E. huxleyi to a matrix of two levels of dissolved inorganic carbon (1400, 2800 μmol kg(−1)) and pH (8.15, 7.85) and directly measured cellular O(2), CO(2) and HCO(3) (−) fluxes under these conditions. Exposure to increased [CO(2)] had little effect on the photosynthetic fluxes, whereas increased [H(+)] led to a significant decline in HCO(3) (−) uptake. Low‐light acclimated cells overcompensated for the inhibition of HCO(3) (−) uptake by increasing CO(2) uptake. High‐light acclimated cells, relying on higher proportions of HCO(3) (−) uptake, could not increase CO(2) uptake and photosynthetic O(2) evolution consequently became carbon‐limited. These regulations indicate that OA responses in photosynthesis are caused by [H(+)] rather than by [CO(2)]. The impaired HCO(3) (−) uptake also provides a mechanistic explanation for lowered calcification under OA. Moreover, it explains the OA‐dependent decrease in photosynthesis observed in high‐light grown phytoplankton. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5069628 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50696282016-11-02 Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi Kottmeier, Dorothee M. Rokitta, Sebastian D. Rost, Björn New Phytol Research A combined increase in seawater [CO(2)] and [H(+)] was recently shown to induce a shift from photosynthetic HCO(3) (−) to CO(2) uptake in Emiliania huxleyi. This shift occurred within minutes, whereas acclimation to ocean acidification (OA) did not affect the carbon source. To identify the driver of this shift, we exposed low‐ and high‐light acclimated E. huxleyi to a matrix of two levels of dissolved inorganic carbon (1400, 2800 μmol kg(−1)) and pH (8.15, 7.85) and directly measured cellular O(2), CO(2) and HCO(3) (−) fluxes under these conditions. Exposure to increased [CO(2)] had little effect on the photosynthetic fluxes, whereas increased [H(+)] led to a significant decline in HCO(3) (−) uptake. Low‐light acclimated cells overcompensated for the inhibition of HCO(3) (−) uptake by increasing CO(2) uptake. High‐light acclimated cells, relying on higher proportions of HCO(3) (−) uptake, could not increase CO(2) uptake and photosynthetic O(2) evolution consequently became carbon‐limited. These regulations indicate that OA responses in photosynthesis are caused by [H(+)] rather than by [CO(2)]. The impaired HCO(3) (−) uptake also provides a mechanistic explanation for lowered calcification under OA. Moreover, it explains the OA‐dependent decrease in photosynthesis observed in high‐light grown phytoplankton. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02-25 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5069628/ /pubmed/26918275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13885 Text en © 2016 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2016 New Phytologist Trust This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Kottmeier, Dorothee M. Rokitta, Sebastian D. Rost, Björn Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi |
title | Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi
|
title_full | Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi
|
title_fullStr | Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi
|
title_full_unstemmed | Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi
|
title_short | Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi
|
title_sort | acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore emiliania huxleyi |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069628/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13885 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kottmeierdorotheem acidificationnotcarbonationisthemajorregulatorofcarbonfluxesinthecoccolithophoreemilianiahuxleyi AT rokittasebastiand acidificationnotcarbonationisthemajorregulatorofcarbonfluxesinthecoccolithophoreemilianiahuxleyi AT rostbjorn acidificationnotcarbonationisthemajorregulatorofcarbonfluxesinthecoccolithophoreemilianiahuxleyi |