Cargando…

Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi

A combined increase in seawater [CO(2)] and [H(+)] was recently shown to induce a shift from photosynthetic HCO(3) (−) to CO(2) uptake in Emiliania huxleyi. This shift occurred within minutes, whereas acclimation to ocean acidification (OA) did not affect the carbon source. To identify the driver of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kottmeier, Dorothee M., Rokitta, Sebastian D., Rost, Björn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13885
_version_ 1782460974220967936
author Kottmeier, Dorothee M.
Rokitta, Sebastian D.
Rost, Björn
author_facet Kottmeier, Dorothee M.
Rokitta, Sebastian D.
Rost, Björn
author_sort Kottmeier, Dorothee M.
collection PubMed
description A combined increase in seawater [CO(2)] and [H(+)] was recently shown to induce a shift from photosynthetic HCO(3) (−) to CO(2) uptake in Emiliania huxleyi. This shift occurred within minutes, whereas acclimation to ocean acidification (OA) did not affect the carbon source. To identify the driver of this shift, we exposed low‐ and high‐light acclimated E. huxleyi to a matrix of two levels of dissolved inorganic carbon (1400, 2800 μmol kg(−1)) and pH (8.15, 7.85) and directly measured cellular O(2), CO(2) and HCO(3) (−) fluxes under these conditions. Exposure to increased [CO(2)] had little effect on the photosynthetic fluxes, whereas increased [H(+)] led to a significant decline in HCO(3) (−) uptake. Low‐light acclimated cells overcompensated for the inhibition of HCO(3) (−) uptake by increasing CO(2) uptake. High‐light acclimated cells, relying on higher proportions of HCO(3) (−) uptake, could not increase CO(2) uptake and photosynthetic O(2) evolution consequently became carbon‐limited. These regulations indicate that OA responses in photosynthesis are caused by [H(+)] rather than by [CO(2)]. The impaired HCO(3) (−) uptake also provides a mechanistic explanation for lowered calcification under OA. Moreover, it explains the OA‐dependent decrease in photosynthesis observed in high‐light grown phytoplankton.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5069628
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50696282016-11-02 Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi Kottmeier, Dorothee M. Rokitta, Sebastian D. Rost, Björn New Phytol Research A combined increase in seawater [CO(2)] and [H(+)] was recently shown to induce a shift from photosynthetic HCO(3) (−) to CO(2) uptake in Emiliania huxleyi. This shift occurred within minutes, whereas acclimation to ocean acidification (OA) did not affect the carbon source. To identify the driver of this shift, we exposed low‐ and high‐light acclimated E. huxleyi to a matrix of two levels of dissolved inorganic carbon (1400, 2800 μmol kg(−1)) and pH (8.15, 7.85) and directly measured cellular O(2), CO(2) and HCO(3) (−) fluxes under these conditions. Exposure to increased [CO(2)] had little effect on the photosynthetic fluxes, whereas increased [H(+)] led to a significant decline in HCO(3) (−) uptake. Low‐light acclimated cells overcompensated for the inhibition of HCO(3) (−) uptake by increasing CO(2) uptake. High‐light acclimated cells, relying on higher proportions of HCO(3) (−) uptake, could not increase CO(2) uptake and photosynthetic O(2) evolution consequently became carbon‐limited. These regulations indicate that OA responses in photosynthesis are caused by [H(+)] rather than by [CO(2)]. The impaired HCO(3) (−) uptake also provides a mechanistic explanation for lowered calcification under OA. Moreover, it explains the OA‐dependent decrease in photosynthesis observed in high‐light grown phytoplankton. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-02-25 2016-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5069628/ /pubmed/26918275 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13885 Text en © 2016 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2016 New Phytologist Trust This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Kottmeier, Dorothee M.
Rokitta, Sebastian D.
Rost, Björn
Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi
title Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi
title_full Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi
title_fullStr Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi
title_full_unstemmed Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi
title_short Acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi
title_sort acidification, not carbonation, is the major regulator of carbon fluxes in the coccolithophore emiliania huxleyi
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069628/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26918275
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/nph.13885
work_keys_str_mv AT kottmeierdorotheem acidificationnotcarbonationisthemajorregulatorofcarbonfluxesinthecoccolithophoreemilianiahuxleyi
AT rokittasebastiand acidificationnotcarbonationisthemajorregulatorofcarbonfluxesinthecoccolithophoreemilianiahuxleyi
AT rostbjorn acidificationnotcarbonationisthemajorregulatorofcarbonfluxesinthecoccolithophoreemilianiahuxleyi