Cargando…
Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions
BACKGROUND: Postoperative wound complications are common following surgical procedures. Negative‐pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is well recognized for the management of open wounds and has been applied recently to closed surgical incisions. The evidence base to support this intervention is limited. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26994715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10084 |
_version_ | 1782460978296782848 |
---|---|
author | Hyldig, N. Birke‐Sorensen, H. Kruse, M. Vinter, C. Joergensen, J. S. Sorensen, J. A. Mogensen, O. Lamont, R. F. Bille, C. |
author_facet | Hyldig, N. Birke‐Sorensen, H. Kruse, M. Vinter, C. Joergensen, J. S. Sorensen, J. A. Mogensen, O. Lamont, R. F. Bille, C. |
author_sort | Hyldig, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Postoperative wound complications are common following surgical procedures. Negative‐pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is well recognized for the management of open wounds and has been applied recently to closed surgical incisions. The evidence base to support this intervention is limited. The aim of this study was to assess whether NPWT reduces postoperative wound complications when applied to closed surgical incisions. METHODS: This was a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials of NPWT compared with standard postoperative dressings on closed surgical incisions. RESULTS: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 1311 incisions in 1089 patients. NPWT was associated with a significant reduction in wound infection (relative risk (RR) 0·54, 95 per cent c.i. 0·33 to 0·89) and seroma formation (RR 0·48, 0·27 to 0·84) compared with standard care. The reduction in wound dehiscence was not significant. The numbers needed to treat were three (seroma), 17 (dehiscence) and 25 (infection). Methodological heterogeneity across studies led to downgrading of the quality of evidence to moderate for infection and seroma, and low for dehiscence. CONCLUSION: Compared with standard postoperative dressings, NPWT significantly reduced the rate of wound infection and seroma when applied to closed surgical wounds. Heterogeneity between the included studies means that no general recommendations can be made yet. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5069647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50696472016-11-02 Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions Hyldig, N. Birke‐Sorensen, H. Kruse, M. Vinter, C. Joergensen, J. S. Sorensen, J. A. Mogensen, O. Lamont, R. F. Bille, C. Br J Surg Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Postoperative wound complications are common following surgical procedures. Negative‐pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is well recognized for the management of open wounds and has been applied recently to closed surgical incisions. The evidence base to support this intervention is limited. The aim of this study was to assess whether NPWT reduces postoperative wound complications when applied to closed surgical incisions. METHODS: This was a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials of NPWT compared with standard postoperative dressings on closed surgical incisions. RESULTS: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 1311 incisions in 1089 patients. NPWT was associated with a significant reduction in wound infection (relative risk (RR) 0·54, 95 per cent c.i. 0·33 to 0·89) and seroma formation (RR 0·48, 0·27 to 0·84) compared with standard care. The reduction in wound dehiscence was not significant. The numbers needed to treat were three (seroma), 17 (dehiscence) and 25 (infection). Methodological heterogeneity across studies led to downgrading of the quality of evidence to moderate for infection and seroma, and low for dehiscence. CONCLUSION: Compared with standard postoperative dressings, NPWT significantly reduced the rate of wound infection and seroma when applied to closed surgical wounds. Heterogeneity between the included studies means that no general recommendations can be made yet. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2016-03-16 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5069647/ /pubmed/26994715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10084 Text en © 2016 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Hyldig, N. Birke‐Sorensen, H. Kruse, M. Vinter, C. Joergensen, J. S. Sorensen, J. A. Mogensen, O. Lamont, R. F. Bille, C. Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions |
title | Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions |
title_full | Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions |
title_fullStr | Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions |
title_full_unstemmed | Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions |
title_short | Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions |
title_sort | meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26994715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10084 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hyldign metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions AT birkesorensenh metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions AT krusem metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions AT vinterc metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions AT joergensenjs metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions AT sorensenja metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions AT mogenseno metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions AT lamontrf metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions AT billec metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions |