Cargando…

Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions

BACKGROUND: Postoperative wound complications are common following surgical procedures. Negative‐pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is well recognized for the management of open wounds and has been applied recently to closed surgical incisions. The evidence base to support this intervention is limited. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hyldig, N., Birke‐Sorensen, H., Kruse, M., Vinter, C., Joergensen, J. S., Sorensen, J. A., Mogensen, O., Lamont, R. F., Bille, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26994715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10084
_version_ 1782460978296782848
author Hyldig, N.
Birke‐Sorensen, H.
Kruse, M.
Vinter, C.
Joergensen, J. S.
Sorensen, J. A.
Mogensen, O.
Lamont, R. F.
Bille, C.
author_facet Hyldig, N.
Birke‐Sorensen, H.
Kruse, M.
Vinter, C.
Joergensen, J. S.
Sorensen, J. A.
Mogensen, O.
Lamont, R. F.
Bille, C.
author_sort Hyldig, N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postoperative wound complications are common following surgical procedures. Negative‐pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is well recognized for the management of open wounds and has been applied recently to closed surgical incisions. The evidence base to support this intervention is limited. The aim of this study was to assess whether NPWT reduces postoperative wound complications when applied to closed surgical incisions. METHODS: This was a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials of NPWT compared with standard postoperative dressings on closed surgical incisions. RESULTS: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 1311 incisions in 1089 patients. NPWT was associated with a significant reduction in wound infection (relative risk (RR) 0·54, 95 per cent c.i. 0·33 to 0·89) and seroma formation (RR 0·48, 0·27 to 0·84) compared with standard care. The reduction in wound dehiscence was not significant. The numbers needed to treat were three (seroma), 17 (dehiscence) and 25 (infection). Methodological heterogeneity across studies led to downgrading of the quality of evidence to moderate for infection and seroma, and low for dehiscence. CONCLUSION: Compared with standard postoperative dressings, NPWT significantly reduced the rate of wound infection and seroma when applied to closed surgical wounds. Heterogeneity between the included studies means that no general recommendations can be made yet.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5069647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50696472016-11-02 Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions Hyldig, N. Birke‐Sorensen, H. Kruse, M. Vinter, C. Joergensen, J. S. Sorensen, J. A. Mogensen, O. Lamont, R. F. Bille, C. Br J Surg Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Postoperative wound complications are common following surgical procedures. Negative‐pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is well recognized for the management of open wounds and has been applied recently to closed surgical incisions. The evidence base to support this intervention is limited. The aim of this study was to assess whether NPWT reduces postoperative wound complications when applied to closed surgical incisions. METHODS: This was a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials of NPWT compared with standard postoperative dressings on closed surgical incisions. RESULTS: Ten studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting on 1311 incisions in 1089 patients. NPWT was associated with a significant reduction in wound infection (relative risk (RR) 0·54, 95 per cent c.i. 0·33 to 0·89) and seroma formation (RR 0·48, 0·27 to 0·84) compared with standard care. The reduction in wound dehiscence was not significant. The numbers needed to treat were three (seroma), 17 (dehiscence) and 25 (infection). Methodological heterogeneity across studies led to downgrading of the quality of evidence to moderate for infection and seroma, and low for dehiscence. CONCLUSION: Compared with standard postoperative dressings, NPWT significantly reduced the rate of wound infection and seroma when applied to closed surgical wounds. Heterogeneity between the included studies means that no general recommendations can be made yet. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2016-03-16 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5069647/ /pubmed/26994715 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10084 Text en © 2016 The Authors. BJS published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Hyldig, N.
Birke‐Sorensen, H.
Kruse, M.
Vinter, C.
Joergensen, J. S.
Sorensen, J. A.
Mogensen, O.
Lamont, R. F.
Bille, C.
Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions
title Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions
title_full Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions
title_fullStr Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions
title_full_unstemmed Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions
title_short Meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions
title_sort meta‐analysis of negative‐pressure wound therapy for closed surgical incisions
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26994715
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10084
work_keys_str_mv AT hyldign metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions
AT birkesorensenh metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions
AT krusem metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions
AT vinterc metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions
AT joergensenjs metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions
AT sorensenja metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions
AT mogenseno metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions
AT lamontrf metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions
AT billec metaanalysisofnegativepressurewoundtherapyforclosedsurgicalincisions