Cargando…

Preservation Methods Differ in Fecal Microbiome Stability, Affecting Suitability for Field Studies

Immediate freezing at −20°C or below has been considered the gold standard for microbiome preservation, yet this approach is not feasible for many field studies, ranging from anthropology to wildlife conservation. Here we tested five methods for preserving human and dog fecal specimens for periods o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Se Jin, Amir, Amnon, Metcalf, Jessica L., Amato, Katherine R., Xu, Zhenjiang Zech, Humphrey, Greg, Knight, Rob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Microbiology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27822526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00021-16
_version_ 1782460996430856192
author Song, Se Jin
Amir, Amnon
Metcalf, Jessica L.
Amato, Katherine R.
Xu, Zhenjiang Zech
Humphrey, Greg
Knight, Rob
author_facet Song, Se Jin
Amir, Amnon
Metcalf, Jessica L.
Amato, Katherine R.
Xu, Zhenjiang Zech
Humphrey, Greg
Knight, Rob
author_sort Song, Se Jin
collection PubMed
description Immediate freezing at −20°C or below has been considered the gold standard for microbiome preservation, yet this approach is not feasible for many field studies, ranging from anthropology to wildlife conservation. Here we tested five methods for preserving human and dog fecal specimens for periods of up to 8 weeks, including such types of variation as freeze-thaw cycles and the high temperature fluctuations often encountered under field conditions. We found that three of the methods—95% ethanol, FTA cards, and the OMNIgene Gut kit—can preserve samples sufficiently well at ambient temperatures such that differences at 8 weeks are comparable to differences among technical replicates. However, even the worst methods, including those with no fixative, were able to reveal microbiome differences between species at 8 weeks and between individuals after a week, allowing meta-analyses of samples collected using various methods when the effect of interest is expected to be larger than interindividual variation (although use of a single method within a study is strongly recommended to reduce batch effects). Encouragingly for FTA cards, the differences caused by this method are systematic and can be detrended. As in other studies, we strongly caution against the use of 70% ethanol. The results, spanning 15 individuals and over 1,200 samples, provide our most comprehensive view to date of storage effects on stool and provide a paradigm for the future studies of other sample types that will be required to provide a global view of microbial diversity and its interaction among humans, animals, and the environment. IMPORTANCE Our study, spanning 15 individuals and over 1,200 samples, provides our most comprehensive view to date of storage and stabilization effects on stool. We tested five methods for preserving human and dog fecal specimens for periods of up to 8 weeks, including the types of variation often encountered under field conditions, such as freeze-thaw cycles and high temperature fluctuations. We show that several cost-effective methods provide excellent microbiome stability out to 8 weeks, opening up a range of field studies with humans and wildlife that would otherwise be cost-prohibitive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5069758
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50697582016-11-07 Preservation Methods Differ in Fecal Microbiome Stability, Affecting Suitability for Field Studies Song, Se Jin Amir, Amnon Metcalf, Jessica L. Amato, Katherine R. Xu, Zhenjiang Zech Humphrey, Greg Knight, Rob mSystems Research Article Immediate freezing at −20°C or below has been considered the gold standard for microbiome preservation, yet this approach is not feasible for many field studies, ranging from anthropology to wildlife conservation. Here we tested five methods for preserving human and dog fecal specimens for periods of up to 8 weeks, including such types of variation as freeze-thaw cycles and the high temperature fluctuations often encountered under field conditions. We found that three of the methods—95% ethanol, FTA cards, and the OMNIgene Gut kit—can preserve samples sufficiently well at ambient temperatures such that differences at 8 weeks are comparable to differences among technical replicates. However, even the worst methods, including those with no fixative, were able to reveal microbiome differences between species at 8 weeks and between individuals after a week, allowing meta-analyses of samples collected using various methods when the effect of interest is expected to be larger than interindividual variation (although use of a single method within a study is strongly recommended to reduce batch effects). Encouragingly for FTA cards, the differences caused by this method are systematic and can be detrended. As in other studies, we strongly caution against the use of 70% ethanol. The results, spanning 15 individuals and over 1,200 samples, provide our most comprehensive view to date of storage effects on stool and provide a paradigm for the future studies of other sample types that will be required to provide a global view of microbial diversity and its interaction among humans, animals, and the environment. IMPORTANCE Our study, spanning 15 individuals and over 1,200 samples, provides our most comprehensive view to date of storage and stabilization effects on stool. We tested five methods for preserving human and dog fecal specimens for periods of up to 8 weeks, including the types of variation often encountered under field conditions, such as freeze-thaw cycles and high temperature fluctuations. We show that several cost-effective methods provide excellent microbiome stability out to 8 weeks, opening up a range of field studies with humans and wildlife that would otherwise be cost-prohibitive. American Society for Microbiology 2016-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5069758/ /pubmed/27822526 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00021-16 Text en Copyright © 2016 Song et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Song, Se Jin
Amir, Amnon
Metcalf, Jessica L.
Amato, Katherine R.
Xu, Zhenjiang Zech
Humphrey, Greg
Knight, Rob
Preservation Methods Differ in Fecal Microbiome Stability, Affecting Suitability for Field Studies
title Preservation Methods Differ in Fecal Microbiome Stability, Affecting Suitability for Field Studies
title_full Preservation Methods Differ in Fecal Microbiome Stability, Affecting Suitability for Field Studies
title_fullStr Preservation Methods Differ in Fecal Microbiome Stability, Affecting Suitability for Field Studies
title_full_unstemmed Preservation Methods Differ in Fecal Microbiome Stability, Affecting Suitability for Field Studies
title_short Preservation Methods Differ in Fecal Microbiome Stability, Affecting Suitability for Field Studies
title_sort preservation methods differ in fecal microbiome stability, affecting suitability for field studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069758/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27822526
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00021-16
work_keys_str_mv AT songsejin preservationmethodsdifferinfecalmicrobiomestabilityaffectingsuitabilityforfieldstudies
AT amiramnon preservationmethodsdifferinfecalmicrobiomestabilityaffectingsuitabilityforfieldstudies
AT metcalfjessical preservationmethodsdifferinfecalmicrobiomestabilityaffectingsuitabilityforfieldstudies
AT amatokatheriner preservationmethodsdifferinfecalmicrobiomestabilityaffectingsuitabilityforfieldstudies
AT xuzhenjiangzech preservationmethodsdifferinfecalmicrobiomestabilityaffectingsuitabilityforfieldstudies
AT humphreygreg preservationmethodsdifferinfecalmicrobiomestabilityaffectingsuitabilityforfieldstudies
AT knightrob preservationmethodsdifferinfecalmicrobiomestabilityaffectingsuitabilityforfieldstudies