Cargando…
Development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire (SE-12) measuring the clinical communication skills of health care professionals
BACKGROUND: The outcome of communication training is widely measured by self-efficacy ratings, and different questionnaires have been used. Nevertheless, none of these questionnaires have been formally validated through systematic measurement of assessment properties. Consequently, we decided to fur...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27756291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0798-7 |
_version_ | 1782461004137889792 |
---|---|
author | Axboe, Mette K. Christensen, Kaj S. Kofoed, Poul-Erik Ammentorp, Jette |
author_facet | Axboe, Mette K. Christensen, Kaj S. Kofoed, Poul-Erik Ammentorp, Jette |
author_sort | Axboe, Mette K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The outcome of communication training is widely measured by self-efficacy ratings, and different questionnaires have been used. Nevertheless, none of these questionnaires have been formally validated through systematic measurement of assessment properties. Consequently, we decided to further develop a self-efficacy questionnaire which has been used in previous studies. This study aims to examine the content, internal structure, and relations with other variables of the new version of the self-efficacy questionnaire (SE-12). METHODS: The questionnaire was developed on the basis of the theoretical approach applied in the communication course, statements from former course participants, teachers, and experts in the field. The questionnaire was initially validated through face-to-face interviews with 9 staff members following a test-retest including 195 participants. RESULTS: After minor adjustments, the SE-12 questionnaire demonstrated evidence of content validity. An explorative factor analysis indicated unidimensionality with highly correlated items. A Cronbach’s α of 0.95 and a Loevinger’s H coefficient of 0.71 provided evidence of statistical reliability and scalability. The test-retest reliability had a value of 0.71 when evaluated using intra-class correlation. Expected relations with other variables were partially confirmed in two of three hypotheses, but a ceiling effect was present in 9 of 12 items. CONCLUSIONS: The SE-12 scale should be regarded a reliable and partially valid instrument. We consider the questionnaire useful for self-evaluation of clinical communication skills; the SE-12 is user-friendly and can be administered as an electronic questionnaire. However, future research should explore potential needs for adjustments to reduce the identified ceiling effect. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0798-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5069791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50697912016-10-24 Development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire (SE-12) measuring the clinical communication skills of health care professionals Axboe, Mette K. Christensen, Kaj S. Kofoed, Poul-Erik Ammentorp, Jette BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: The outcome of communication training is widely measured by self-efficacy ratings, and different questionnaires have been used. Nevertheless, none of these questionnaires have been formally validated through systematic measurement of assessment properties. Consequently, we decided to further develop a self-efficacy questionnaire which has been used in previous studies. This study aims to examine the content, internal structure, and relations with other variables of the new version of the self-efficacy questionnaire (SE-12). METHODS: The questionnaire was developed on the basis of the theoretical approach applied in the communication course, statements from former course participants, teachers, and experts in the field. The questionnaire was initially validated through face-to-face interviews with 9 staff members following a test-retest including 195 participants. RESULTS: After minor adjustments, the SE-12 questionnaire demonstrated evidence of content validity. An explorative factor analysis indicated unidimensionality with highly correlated items. A Cronbach’s α of 0.95 and a Loevinger’s H coefficient of 0.71 provided evidence of statistical reliability and scalability. The test-retest reliability had a value of 0.71 when evaluated using intra-class correlation. Expected relations with other variables were partially confirmed in two of three hypotheses, but a ceiling effect was present in 9 of 12 items. CONCLUSIONS: The SE-12 scale should be regarded a reliable and partially valid instrument. We consider the questionnaire useful for self-evaluation of clinical communication skills; the SE-12 is user-friendly and can be administered as an electronic questionnaire. However, future research should explore potential needs for adjustments to reduce the identified ceiling effect. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0798-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5069791/ /pubmed/27756291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0798-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Axboe, Mette K. Christensen, Kaj S. Kofoed, Poul-Erik Ammentorp, Jette Development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire (SE-12) measuring the clinical communication skills of health care professionals |
title | Development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire (SE-12) measuring the clinical communication skills of health care professionals |
title_full | Development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire (SE-12) measuring the clinical communication skills of health care professionals |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire (SE-12) measuring the clinical communication skills of health care professionals |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire (SE-12) measuring the clinical communication skills of health care professionals |
title_short | Development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire (SE-12) measuring the clinical communication skills of health care professionals |
title_sort | development and validation of a self-efficacy questionnaire (se-12) measuring the clinical communication skills of health care professionals |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27756291 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0798-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT axboemettek developmentandvalidationofaselfefficacyquestionnairese12measuringtheclinicalcommunicationskillsofhealthcareprofessionals AT christensenkajs developmentandvalidationofaselfefficacyquestionnairese12measuringtheclinicalcommunicationskillsofhealthcareprofessionals AT kofoedpoulerik developmentandvalidationofaselfefficacyquestionnairese12measuringtheclinicalcommunicationskillsofhealthcareprofessionals AT ammentorpjette developmentandvalidationofaselfefficacyquestionnairese12measuringtheclinicalcommunicationskillsofhealthcareprofessionals |