Cargando…

Adaptation of a RAS pathway activation signature from FF to FFPE tissues in colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The KRAS gene is mutated in about 40 % of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, which has been clinically validated as a predictive mutational marker of intrinsic resistance to anti-EGFR inhibitor (EGFRi) therapy. Since nearly 60 % of patients with a wild type KRAS fail to respond to EGFRi comb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Omolo, Bernard, Yang, Mingli, Lo, Fang Yin, Schell, Michael J., Austin, Sharon, Howard, Kellie, Madan, Anup, Yeatman, Timothy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27756306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-016-0225-2
_version_ 1782461012295811072
author Omolo, Bernard
Yang, Mingli
Lo, Fang Yin
Schell, Michael J.
Austin, Sharon
Howard, Kellie
Madan, Anup
Yeatman, Timothy J.
author_facet Omolo, Bernard
Yang, Mingli
Lo, Fang Yin
Schell, Michael J.
Austin, Sharon
Howard, Kellie
Madan, Anup
Yeatman, Timothy J.
author_sort Omolo, Bernard
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The KRAS gene is mutated in about 40 % of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, which has been clinically validated as a predictive mutational marker of intrinsic resistance to anti-EGFR inhibitor (EGFRi) therapy. Since nearly 60 % of patients with a wild type KRAS fail to respond to EGFRi combination therapies, there is a need to develop more reliable molecular signatures to better predict response. Here we address the challenge of adapting a gene expression signature predictive of RAS pathway activation, created using fresh frozen (FF) tissues, for use with more widely available formalin fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. METHODS: In this study, we evaluated the translation of an 18-gene RAS pathway signature score from FF to FFPE in 54 CRC cases, using a head-to-head comparison of five technology platforms. FFPE-based technologies included the Affymetrix GeneChip (Affy), NanoString nCounter™ (NanoS), Illumina whole genome RNASeq (RNA-Acc), Illumina targeted RNASeq (t-RNA), and Illumina stranded Total RNA-rRNA-depletion (rRNA). RESULTS: Using Affy_FF as the “gold” standard, initial analysis of the 18-gene RAS scores on all 54 samples shows varying pairwise Spearman correlations, with (1) Affy_FFPE (r = 0.233, p = 0.090); (2) NanoS_FFPE (r = 0.608, p < 0.0001); (3) RNA-Acc_FFPE (r = 0.175, p = 0.21); (4) t-RNA_FFPE (r = −0.237, p = 0.085); (5) and t-RNA (r = −0.012, p = 0.93). These results suggest that only NanoString has successful FF to FFPE translation. The subsequent removal of identified “problematic” samples (n = 15) and genes (n = 2) further improves the correlations of Affy_FF with three of the five technologies: Affy_FFPE (r = 0.672, p < 0.0001); NanoS_FFPE (r = 0.738, p < 0.0001); and RNA-Acc_FFPE (r = 0.483, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Of the five technology platforms tested, NanoString technology provides a more faithful translation of the RAS pathway gene expression signature from FF to FFPE than the Affymetrix GeneChip and multiple RNASeq technologies. Moreover, NanoString was the most forgiving technology in the analysis of samples with presumably poor RNA quality. Using this approach, the RAS signature score may now be reasonably applied to FFPE clinical samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12920-016-0225-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5069826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50698262016-10-24 Adaptation of a RAS pathway activation signature from FF to FFPE tissues in colorectal cancer Omolo, Bernard Yang, Mingli Lo, Fang Yin Schell, Michael J. Austin, Sharon Howard, Kellie Madan, Anup Yeatman, Timothy J. BMC Med Genomics Technical Advance BACKGROUND: The KRAS gene is mutated in about 40 % of colorectal cancer (CRC) cases, which has been clinically validated as a predictive mutational marker of intrinsic resistance to anti-EGFR inhibitor (EGFRi) therapy. Since nearly 60 % of patients with a wild type KRAS fail to respond to EGFRi combination therapies, there is a need to develop more reliable molecular signatures to better predict response. Here we address the challenge of adapting a gene expression signature predictive of RAS pathway activation, created using fresh frozen (FF) tissues, for use with more widely available formalin fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. METHODS: In this study, we evaluated the translation of an 18-gene RAS pathway signature score from FF to FFPE in 54 CRC cases, using a head-to-head comparison of five technology platforms. FFPE-based technologies included the Affymetrix GeneChip (Affy), NanoString nCounter™ (NanoS), Illumina whole genome RNASeq (RNA-Acc), Illumina targeted RNASeq (t-RNA), and Illumina stranded Total RNA-rRNA-depletion (rRNA). RESULTS: Using Affy_FF as the “gold” standard, initial analysis of the 18-gene RAS scores on all 54 samples shows varying pairwise Spearman correlations, with (1) Affy_FFPE (r = 0.233, p = 0.090); (2) NanoS_FFPE (r = 0.608, p < 0.0001); (3) RNA-Acc_FFPE (r = 0.175, p = 0.21); (4) t-RNA_FFPE (r = −0.237, p = 0.085); (5) and t-RNA (r = −0.012, p = 0.93). These results suggest that only NanoString has successful FF to FFPE translation. The subsequent removal of identified “problematic” samples (n = 15) and genes (n = 2) further improves the correlations of Affy_FF with three of the five technologies: Affy_FFPE (r = 0.672, p < 0.0001); NanoS_FFPE (r = 0.738, p < 0.0001); and RNA-Acc_FFPE (r = 0.483, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Of the five technology platforms tested, NanoString technology provides a more faithful translation of the RAS pathway gene expression signature from FF to FFPE than the Affymetrix GeneChip and multiple RNASeq technologies. Moreover, NanoString was the most forgiving technology in the analysis of samples with presumably poor RNA quality. Using this approach, the RAS signature score may now be reasonably applied to FFPE clinical samples. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12920-016-0225-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5069826/ /pubmed/27756306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-016-0225-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Technical Advance
Omolo, Bernard
Yang, Mingli
Lo, Fang Yin
Schell, Michael J.
Austin, Sharon
Howard, Kellie
Madan, Anup
Yeatman, Timothy J.
Adaptation of a RAS pathway activation signature from FF to FFPE tissues in colorectal cancer
title Adaptation of a RAS pathway activation signature from FF to FFPE tissues in colorectal cancer
title_full Adaptation of a RAS pathway activation signature from FF to FFPE tissues in colorectal cancer
title_fullStr Adaptation of a RAS pathway activation signature from FF to FFPE tissues in colorectal cancer
title_full_unstemmed Adaptation of a RAS pathway activation signature from FF to FFPE tissues in colorectal cancer
title_short Adaptation of a RAS pathway activation signature from FF to FFPE tissues in colorectal cancer
title_sort adaptation of a ras pathway activation signature from ff to ffpe tissues in colorectal cancer
topic Technical Advance
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27756306
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12920-016-0225-2
work_keys_str_mv AT omolobernard adaptationofaraspathwayactivationsignaturefromfftoffpetissuesincolorectalcancer
AT yangmingli adaptationofaraspathwayactivationsignaturefromfftoffpetissuesincolorectalcancer
AT lofangyin adaptationofaraspathwayactivationsignaturefromfftoffpetissuesincolorectalcancer
AT schellmichaelj adaptationofaraspathwayactivationsignaturefromfftoffpetissuesincolorectalcancer
AT austinsharon adaptationofaraspathwayactivationsignaturefromfftoffpetissuesincolorectalcancer
AT howardkellie adaptationofaraspathwayactivationsignaturefromfftoffpetissuesincolorectalcancer
AT madananup adaptationofaraspathwayactivationsignaturefromfftoffpetissuesincolorectalcancer
AT yeatmantimothyj adaptationofaraspathwayactivationsignaturefromfftoffpetissuesincolorectalcancer