Cargando…

Effects of recall time on cause-of-death findings using verbal autopsy: empirical evidence from rural South Africa

BACKGROUND: Verbal autopsy (VA) is a widely used technique for assigning causes to non-medically certified deaths using information gathered from a close caregiver. Both operational and cultural factors may cause delays in follow-up of deaths. The resulting time lag—from death to VA interview—can in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hussain-Alkhateeb, Laith, Petzold, Max, Collinson, Mark, Tollman, Stephen, Kahn, Kathleen, Byass, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27777600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12982-016-0051-1
_version_ 1782461022950391808
author Hussain-Alkhateeb, Laith
Petzold, Max
Collinson, Mark
Tollman, Stephen
Kahn, Kathleen
Byass, Peter
author_facet Hussain-Alkhateeb, Laith
Petzold, Max
Collinson, Mark
Tollman, Stephen
Kahn, Kathleen
Byass, Peter
author_sort Hussain-Alkhateeb, Laith
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Verbal autopsy (VA) is a widely used technique for assigning causes to non-medically certified deaths using information gathered from a close caregiver. Both operational and cultural factors may cause delays in follow-up of deaths. The resulting time lag—from death to VA interview—can influence ways in which terminal events are remembered, and thus affect cause-of-death assignment. This study investigates the impact of recall period on causes of death determined by VA. METHODS: A total of 10,882 deaths from the Agincourt Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) with complete VAs, including recall period, were incorporated in this study. To measure seasonal effect, cause specific mortality fractions (CSMFs) were calculated and compared by every cause for VAs undertaken within six months of death and those undertaken from six to 12 months of death. All causes were classified into eight broad categories and entered in a multiple logistic regression to explore outcome by recall period in relation to covariates. RESULTS: The majority of deaths (83 %) had VAs completed within 12 months. There was a tendency towards longer recall periods for deaths of those under one year or over 65 years of age. Only the acute respiratory, diarrhoeal and other unspecified non-communicable disease groups showed a CSMF ratio significantly different from unity at the 99 % confidence level between the two recall periods. Only neonatal deaths showed significantly different OR for recall exceeding 12 months (OR 1.69; p value = 0.004) and this increased when adjusting for background factors (OR 2.58; p value = 0.000). CONCLUSION: A recall period of up to one year between death and VA interview did not have any consequential effects on the cause-of-death patterns derived, with the exception of neonatal causes. This is an important operational consideration given the planned widespread use of the VA approach in civil registration, HDSS sites and occasional surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5069872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50698722016-10-24 Effects of recall time on cause-of-death findings using verbal autopsy: empirical evidence from rural South Africa Hussain-Alkhateeb, Laith Petzold, Max Collinson, Mark Tollman, Stephen Kahn, Kathleen Byass, Peter Emerg Themes Epidemiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Verbal autopsy (VA) is a widely used technique for assigning causes to non-medically certified deaths using information gathered from a close caregiver. Both operational and cultural factors may cause delays in follow-up of deaths. The resulting time lag—from death to VA interview—can influence ways in which terminal events are remembered, and thus affect cause-of-death assignment. This study investigates the impact of recall period on causes of death determined by VA. METHODS: A total of 10,882 deaths from the Agincourt Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) with complete VAs, including recall period, were incorporated in this study. To measure seasonal effect, cause specific mortality fractions (CSMFs) were calculated and compared by every cause for VAs undertaken within six months of death and those undertaken from six to 12 months of death. All causes were classified into eight broad categories and entered in a multiple logistic regression to explore outcome by recall period in relation to covariates. RESULTS: The majority of deaths (83 %) had VAs completed within 12 months. There was a tendency towards longer recall periods for deaths of those under one year or over 65 years of age. Only the acute respiratory, diarrhoeal and other unspecified non-communicable disease groups showed a CSMF ratio significantly different from unity at the 99 % confidence level between the two recall periods. Only neonatal deaths showed significantly different OR for recall exceeding 12 months (OR 1.69; p value = 0.004) and this increased when adjusting for background factors (OR 2.58; p value = 0.000). CONCLUSION: A recall period of up to one year between death and VA interview did not have any consequential effects on the cause-of-death patterns derived, with the exception of neonatal causes. This is an important operational consideration given the planned widespread use of the VA approach in civil registration, HDSS sites and occasional surveys. BioMed Central 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5069872/ /pubmed/27777600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12982-016-0051-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hussain-Alkhateeb, Laith
Petzold, Max
Collinson, Mark
Tollman, Stephen
Kahn, Kathleen
Byass, Peter
Effects of recall time on cause-of-death findings using verbal autopsy: empirical evidence from rural South Africa
title Effects of recall time on cause-of-death findings using verbal autopsy: empirical evidence from rural South Africa
title_full Effects of recall time on cause-of-death findings using verbal autopsy: empirical evidence from rural South Africa
title_fullStr Effects of recall time on cause-of-death findings using verbal autopsy: empirical evidence from rural South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Effects of recall time on cause-of-death findings using verbal autopsy: empirical evidence from rural South Africa
title_short Effects of recall time on cause-of-death findings using verbal autopsy: empirical evidence from rural South Africa
title_sort effects of recall time on cause-of-death findings using verbal autopsy: empirical evidence from rural south africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5069872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27777600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12982-016-0051-1
work_keys_str_mv AT hussainalkhateeblaith effectsofrecalltimeoncauseofdeathfindingsusingverbalautopsyempiricalevidencefromruralsouthafrica
AT petzoldmax effectsofrecalltimeoncauseofdeathfindingsusingverbalautopsyempiricalevidencefromruralsouthafrica
AT collinsonmark effectsofrecalltimeoncauseofdeathfindingsusingverbalautopsyempiricalevidencefromruralsouthafrica
AT tollmanstephen effectsofrecalltimeoncauseofdeathfindingsusingverbalautopsyempiricalevidencefromruralsouthafrica
AT kahnkathleen effectsofrecalltimeoncauseofdeathfindingsusingverbalautopsyempiricalevidencefromruralsouthafrica
AT byasspeter effectsofrecalltimeoncauseofdeathfindingsusingverbalautopsyempiricalevidencefromruralsouthafrica