Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Monoclonal antibodies and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) directed against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or its receptors have been investigated in several studies for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC). In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the effic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Jing, Zhang, Yue, Leung, Lai-Han, Liu, Lian, Yang, Fan, Yao, Xiaojun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27756337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13045-016-0340-8
_version_ 1782461087028871168
author Yu, Jing
Zhang, Yue
Leung, Lai-Han
Liu, Lian
Yang, Fan
Yao, Xiaojun
author_facet Yu, Jing
Zhang, Yue
Leung, Lai-Han
Liu, Lian
Yang, Fan
Yao, Xiaojun
author_sort Yu, Jing
collection PubMed
description Monoclonal antibodies and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) directed against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or its receptors have been investigated in several studies for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC). In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced GC. We searched published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing angiogenesis inhibitors with non-angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of GC. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. The extracted data on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were measured in terms of hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). In addition, risk ratios (RR) and corresponding 95 % CIs were pooled for objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and risk of adverse events (AEs). Ten RCTs involving 2786 patients were included. Compared with non-angiogenesis inhibitor-containing regimens, angiogenesis inhibitor-containing regimens resulted in a significant improvement in OS (HR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.69–0.93, P = 0.004), prolonged PFS (HR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.51–0.86, P = 0.002), and superior ORR (RR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.09–1.65, P = 0.005) and DCR (RR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.17–1.61, P = 0.0001). Angiogenesis inhibitors were associated with a greater number of AEs, but most of these were predictable and manageable. However, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and gastrointestinal (GI) perforation were significantly increased in patients treated with angiogenesis inhibitors. In summary, angiogenesis inhibitor-containing regimens were superior to non-angiogenesis inhibitor-containing regimens in terms of OS, PFS, RR, and DCR in patients with advanced GC. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13045-016-0340-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5070169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50701692016-10-24 Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Yu, Jing Zhang, Yue Leung, Lai-Han Liu, Lian Yang, Fan Yao, Xiaojun J Hematol Oncol Review Monoclonal antibodies and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) directed against the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) or its receptors have been investigated in several studies for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC). In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced GC. We searched published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing angiogenesis inhibitors with non-angiogenesis inhibitors for the treatment of GC. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched. The extracted data on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were measured in terms of hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). In addition, risk ratios (RR) and corresponding 95 % CIs were pooled for objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and risk of adverse events (AEs). Ten RCTs involving 2786 patients were included. Compared with non-angiogenesis inhibitor-containing regimens, angiogenesis inhibitor-containing regimens resulted in a significant improvement in OS (HR 0.80, 95 % CI 0.69–0.93, P = 0.004), prolonged PFS (HR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.51–0.86, P = 0.002), and superior ORR (RR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.09–1.65, P = 0.005) and DCR (RR 1.37, 95 % CI 1.17–1.61, P = 0.0001). Angiogenesis inhibitors were associated with a greater number of AEs, but most of these were predictable and manageable. However, hand-foot syndrome, diarrhea, and gastrointestinal (GI) perforation were significantly increased in patients treated with angiogenesis inhibitors. In summary, angiogenesis inhibitor-containing regimens were superior to non-angiogenesis inhibitor-containing regimens in terms of OS, PFS, RR, and DCR in patients with advanced GC. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13045-016-0340-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5070169/ /pubmed/27756337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13045-016-0340-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Yu, Jing
Zhang, Yue
Leung, Lai-Han
Liu, Lian
Yang, Fan
Yao, Xiaojun
Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of angiogenesis inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27756337
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13045-016-0340-8
work_keys_str_mv AT yujing efficacyandsafetyofangiogenesisinhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyue efficacyandsafetyofangiogenesisinhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT leunglaihan efficacyandsafetyofangiogenesisinhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liulian efficacyandsafetyofangiogenesisinhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangfan efficacyandsafetyofangiogenesisinhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yaoxiaojun efficacyandsafetyofangiogenesisinhibitorsinadvancedgastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis