Cargando…

CINGLE-trial: cochlear implantation for siNGLE-sided deafness, a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND: Individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD) have problems with speech perception in noise, localisation of sounds and with communication and social interaction in their daily life. Current treatment modalities (Contralateral Routing of Sound systems [CROS] and Bone Conduction Devices [B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peters, Jeroen PM, van Zon, Alice, Smit, Adriana L, van Zanten, Gijsbert A, de Wit, G Ardine, Stegeman, Inge, Grolman, Wilko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27777509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12901-015-0016-y
_version_ 1782461117285531648
author Peters, Jeroen PM
van Zon, Alice
Smit, Adriana L
van Zanten, Gijsbert A
de Wit, G Ardine
Stegeman, Inge
Grolman, Wilko
author_facet Peters, Jeroen PM
van Zon, Alice
Smit, Adriana L
van Zanten, Gijsbert A
de Wit, G Ardine
Stegeman, Inge
Grolman, Wilko
author_sort Peters, Jeroen PM
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD) have problems with speech perception in noise, localisation of sounds and with communication and social interaction in their daily life. Current treatment modalities (Contralateral Routing of Sound systems [CROS] and Bone Conduction Devices [BCD]) do not restore binaural hearing. Based on low level of evidence studies, CROS and BCD do not improve speech perception in noise or sound localisation. In contrast, cochlear implantation (CI) may overcome the limitations of CROS and BCD, as binaural input can be restored. Promising results have previously been achieved on speech perception in noise, sound localisation, tinnitus and quality of life. METHODS AND DESIGN: A single-center Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) was designed to compare all treatment strategies for SSD. One hundred and twenty adult single-sided deaf patients (duration of deafness >3 months and maximum 10 years; pure tone average at 0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz, deaf ear: threshold equal to or more than 70 dB, better ear: threshold of maximum 30 dB) will be included in this trial and randomised to CI, ‘first BCD, then CROS’ or ‘first CROS, then BCD’-groups. After the trial period, patients in the two latter groups may choose with which treatment option they continue. Outcomes of interest are speech perception in noise, sound localization, tinnitus and quality of life. These outcomes will be measured during a baseline visit and at follow up visits, which will take place at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after onset of treatment. Furthermore, an economic evaluation will be performed and adverse events will be monitored. DISCUSSION: This RCT allows for a comparison between the two current treatment modalities for single-sided deafness and a new promising treatment strategy, CI, on a range of health outcomes: speech perception in noise, sound localization, tinnitus and quality of life. Additionally, we will be able to answer the question if the additional costs of CI are justified by increased benefits, when compared to current treatment strategies. This study will inform health policy makers with regard to reimbursement of CI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (www.trialregister.nl): NTR4580.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5070298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50702982016-10-24 CINGLE-trial: cochlear implantation for siNGLE-sided deafness, a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation Peters, Jeroen PM van Zon, Alice Smit, Adriana L van Zanten, Gijsbert A de Wit, G Ardine Stegeman, Inge Grolman, Wilko BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Individuals with single-sided deafness (SSD) have problems with speech perception in noise, localisation of sounds and with communication and social interaction in their daily life. Current treatment modalities (Contralateral Routing of Sound systems [CROS] and Bone Conduction Devices [BCD]) do not restore binaural hearing. Based on low level of evidence studies, CROS and BCD do not improve speech perception in noise or sound localisation. In contrast, cochlear implantation (CI) may overcome the limitations of CROS and BCD, as binaural input can be restored. Promising results have previously been achieved on speech perception in noise, sound localisation, tinnitus and quality of life. METHODS AND DESIGN: A single-center Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) was designed to compare all treatment strategies for SSD. One hundred and twenty adult single-sided deaf patients (duration of deafness >3 months and maximum 10 years; pure tone average at 0.5, 1, 2, 4 kHz, deaf ear: threshold equal to or more than 70 dB, better ear: threshold of maximum 30 dB) will be included in this trial and randomised to CI, ‘first BCD, then CROS’ or ‘first CROS, then BCD’-groups. After the trial period, patients in the two latter groups may choose with which treatment option they continue. Outcomes of interest are speech perception in noise, sound localization, tinnitus and quality of life. These outcomes will be measured during a baseline visit and at follow up visits, which will take place at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months after onset of treatment. Furthermore, an economic evaluation will be performed and adverse events will be monitored. DISCUSSION: This RCT allows for a comparison between the two current treatment modalities for single-sided deafness and a new promising treatment strategy, CI, on a range of health outcomes: speech perception in noise, sound localization, tinnitus and quality of life. Additionally, we will be able to answer the question if the additional costs of CI are justified by increased benefits, when compared to current treatment strategies. This study will inform health policy makers with regard to reimbursement of CI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Netherlands Trial Register (www.trialregister.nl): NTR4580. BioMed Central 2015-05-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5070298/ /pubmed/27777509 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12901-015-0016-y Text en © Peters et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Peters, Jeroen PM
van Zon, Alice
Smit, Adriana L
van Zanten, Gijsbert A
de Wit, G Ardine
Stegeman, Inge
Grolman, Wilko
CINGLE-trial: cochlear implantation for siNGLE-sided deafness, a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
title CINGLE-trial: cochlear implantation for siNGLE-sided deafness, a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
title_full CINGLE-trial: cochlear implantation for siNGLE-sided deafness, a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
title_fullStr CINGLE-trial: cochlear implantation for siNGLE-sided deafness, a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
title_full_unstemmed CINGLE-trial: cochlear implantation for siNGLE-sided deafness, a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
title_short CINGLE-trial: cochlear implantation for siNGLE-sided deafness, a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
title_sort cingle-trial: cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness, a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27777509
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12901-015-0016-y
work_keys_str_mv AT petersjeroenpm cingletrialcochlearimplantationforsinglesideddeafnessarandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation
AT vanzonalice cingletrialcochlearimplantationforsinglesideddeafnessarandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation
AT smitadrianal cingletrialcochlearimplantationforsinglesideddeafnessarandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation
AT vanzantengijsberta cingletrialcochlearimplantationforsinglesideddeafnessarandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation
AT dewitgardine cingletrialcochlearimplantationforsinglesideddeafnessarandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation
AT stegemaninge cingletrialcochlearimplantationforsinglesideddeafnessarandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation
AT grolmanwilko cingletrialcochlearimplantationforsinglesideddeafnessarandomisedcontrolledtrialandeconomicevaluation