Cargando…

Prescribing differences in family practice for diabetic patients in Germany according to statutory or private health insurance: the case of DPP-4-inhibitors and GLP-1-agonists

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze prescription decisions for family practice (FP) patients with Diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) using the case of the incretin mimetics Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DDP-4) inhibitors and Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists dependent on patients’ he...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laux, Gunter, Berger, Sarah, Szecsenyi, Joachim, Kaufmann-Kolle, Petra, Leutgeb, Rüdiger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27760528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0543-7
_version_ 1782461133378027520
author Laux, Gunter
Berger, Sarah
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Kaufmann-Kolle, Petra
Leutgeb, Rüdiger
author_facet Laux, Gunter
Berger, Sarah
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Kaufmann-Kolle, Petra
Leutgeb, Rüdiger
author_sort Laux, Gunter
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze prescription decisions for family practice (FP) patients with Diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) using the case of the incretin mimetics Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DDP-4) inhibitors and Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists dependent on patients’ health insurance status (statutory or private) in Germany. This study is important since the scientific debate is still open with regard to DPP-4-inhibitors and GLP-1-agonists, where some critics are raising questions on potential long-term risks for patients. METHODS: Data for this analysis were sourced from the German health services research register CONTENT (CONTinuous morbidity registration Epidemiologic NeTwork), in which FP health services information, generated by family practitioners, is continuously collated, e.g. patients’ health insurance status, morbidity and pharmacotherapy. Patients with Diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) were excluded from the study. RESULTS: From the family practices collaborating in the CONTENT research network, there were 7298 patients treated with pharmacotherapeutic agents for DM2 between 01.09.2009 and 31.08.2014. 586 (8.03 %) of these patients had private insurance. Prescriptions for the incretin mimetics were 40.6 % higher (9.7 vs. 6.9 %; p < 0.0001) for patients with private insurance compared to patients with statutory health insurance. This finding was confirmed with multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There was a statistically significant difference found in prescription patterns according to the patient’s health insurance status for the incretin mimetics in this sample population of German patients with DM2. Obviously, these differences result from the eligibility for reimbursement according to patients’ health insurance status. Whether incretin mimetics pose specific long term risks for particular patients is yet to be determined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5070366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50703662016-10-24 Prescribing differences in family practice for diabetic patients in Germany according to statutory or private health insurance: the case of DPP-4-inhibitors and GLP-1-agonists Laux, Gunter Berger, Sarah Szecsenyi, Joachim Kaufmann-Kolle, Petra Leutgeb, Rüdiger BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze prescription decisions for family practice (FP) patients with Diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) using the case of the incretin mimetics Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DDP-4) inhibitors and Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists dependent on patients’ health insurance status (statutory or private) in Germany. This study is important since the scientific debate is still open with regard to DPP-4-inhibitors and GLP-1-agonists, where some critics are raising questions on potential long-term risks for patients. METHODS: Data for this analysis were sourced from the German health services research register CONTENT (CONTinuous morbidity registration Epidemiologic NeTwork), in which FP health services information, generated by family practitioners, is continuously collated, e.g. patients’ health insurance status, morbidity and pharmacotherapy. Patients with Diabetes mellitus type 1 (DM1) were excluded from the study. RESULTS: From the family practices collaborating in the CONTENT research network, there were 7298 patients treated with pharmacotherapeutic agents for DM2 between 01.09.2009 and 31.08.2014. 586 (8.03 %) of these patients had private insurance. Prescriptions for the incretin mimetics were 40.6 % higher (9.7 vs. 6.9 %; p < 0.0001) for patients with private insurance compared to patients with statutory health insurance. This finding was confirmed with multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: There was a statistically significant difference found in prescription patterns according to the patient’s health insurance status for the incretin mimetics in this sample population of German patients with DM2. Obviously, these differences result from the eligibility for reimbursement according to patients’ health insurance status. Whether incretin mimetics pose specific long term risks for particular patients is yet to be determined. BioMed Central 2016-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5070366/ /pubmed/27760528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0543-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Laux, Gunter
Berger, Sarah
Szecsenyi, Joachim
Kaufmann-Kolle, Petra
Leutgeb, Rüdiger
Prescribing differences in family practice for diabetic patients in Germany according to statutory or private health insurance: the case of DPP-4-inhibitors and GLP-1-agonists
title Prescribing differences in family practice for diabetic patients in Germany according to statutory or private health insurance: the case of DPP-4-inhibitors and GLP-1-agonists
title_full Prescribing differences in family practice for diabetic patients in Germany according to statutory or private health insurance: the case of DPP-4-inhibitors and GLP-1-agonists
title_fullStr Prescribing differences in family practice for diabetic patients in Germany according to statutory or private health insurance: the case of DPP-4-inhibitors and GLP-1-agonists
title_full_unstemmed Prescribing differences in family practice for diabetic patients in Germany according to statutory or private health insurance: the case of DPP-4-inhibitors and GLP-1-agonists
title_short Prescribing differences in family practice for diabetic patients in Germany according to statutory or private health insurance: the case of DPP-4-inhibitors and GLP-1-agonists
title_sort prescribing differences in family practice for diabetic patients in germany according to statutory or private health insurance: the case of dpp-4-inhibitors and glp-1-agonists
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27760528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-016-0543-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lauxgunter prescribingdifferencesinfamilypracticefordiabeticpatientsingermanyaccordingtostatutoryorprivatehealthinsurancethecaseofdpp4inhibitorsandglp1agonists
AT bergersarah prescribingdifferencesinfamilypracticefordiabeticpatientsingermanyaccordingtostatutoryorprivatehealthinsurancethecaseofdpp4inhibitorsandglp1agonists
AT szecsenyijoachim prescribingdifferencesinfamilypracticefordiabeticpatientsingermanyaccordingtostatutoryorprivatehealthinsurancethecaseofdpp4inhibitorsandglp1agonists
AT kaufmannkollepetra prescribingdifferencesinfamilypracticefordiabeticpatientsingermanyaccordingtostatutoryorprivatehealthinsurancethecaseofdpp4inhibitorsandglp1agonists
AT leutgebrudiger prescribingdifferencesinfamilypracticefordiabeticpatientsingermanyaccordingtostatutoryorprivatehealthinsurancethecaseofdpp4inhibitorsandglp1agonists