Cargando…
Influence of Implant Design (Cylindrical and Conical) in the Load Transfer Surrounding Long (13mm) and Short (7mm) Length Implants: A Photoelastic Analysis
PURPOSE: This study compared the influence of implant design (cylindrical and conical) in the load transfer on bone surrounding 13mm and 7mm length implants under simulated occlusal loading, using photoelastic analysis. METHOD: Dental implants of 4mm diameter were divided into four groups, which var...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bentham Open
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843505 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010522 |
_version_ | 1782461145039241216 |
---|---|
author | Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre Frugis, Victor Lourenço Shibli, Jamil Awad Fernandez, Maria Piedad Ramirez Sánchez de Val, José Eduardo Maté Girardo, José Luis Calvo Taschieri, Silvio Corbella, Stefano |
author_facet | Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre Frugis, Victor Lourenço Shibli, Jamil Awad Fernandez, Maria Piedad Ramirez Sánchez de Val, José Eduardo Maté Girardo, José Luis Calvo Taschieri, Silvio Corbella, Stefano |
author_sort | Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study compared the influence of implant design (cylindrical and conical) in the load transfer on bone surrounding 13mm and 7mm length implants under simulated occlusal loading, using photoelastic analysis. METHOD: Dental implants of 4mm diameter were divided into four groups, which varied in length and design: Group 1- standard (13 mm) cylindrical implant; Group 2 - standard conical implant; Group 3 – short (7 mm) cylindrical implant, and Group 4 - short conical implant. After the inclusion of the implant models in a photoelastic resin, they were subjected to a static load of 100 N. The lengths of the fringes that were generated were measured in three portions since the implants body: crestal, central and apical portion, parallel to the implant long axis. Furthermore, the entire extension area of dissipation of force was measured. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Lower stress was observed at the crestal bone in groups 2 and 4, while the stress levels in groups 1 and 3 were higher with significant differences compared to the other groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The total amount of stress transmitted to the bone was not affected by implant length under axial loading condition, but changed in relation to the implant design with respect to the concentration of the fringes, which corresponded to the load distribution, with even more dissipation by conical implants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5070426 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Bentham Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50704262016-11-14 Influence of Implant Design (Cylindrical and Conical) in the Load Transfer Surrounding Long (13mm) and Short (7mm) Length Implants: A Photoelastic Analysis Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre Frugis, Victor Lourenço Shibli, Jamil Awad Fernandez, Maria Piedad Ramirez Sánchez de Val, José Eduardo Maté Girardo, José Luis Calvo Taschieri, Silvio Corbella, Stefano Open Dent J Article PURPOSE: This study compared the influence of implant design (cylindrical and conical) in the load transfer on bone surrounding 13mm and 7mm length implants under simulated occlusal loading, using photoelastic analysis. METHOD: Dental implants of 4mm diameter were divided into four groups, which varied in length and design: Group 1- standard (13 mm) cylindrical implant; Group 2 - standard conical implant; Group 3 – short (7 mm) cylindrical implant, and Group 4 - short conical implant. After the inclusion of the implant models in a photoelastic resin, they were subjected to a static load of 100 N. The lengths of the fringes that were generated were measured in three portions since the implants body: crestal, central and apical portion, parallel to the implant long axis. Furthermore, the entire extension area of dissipation of force was measured. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Lower stress was observed at the crestal bone in groups 2 and 4, while the stress levels in groups 1 and 3 were higher with significant differences compared to the other groups (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The total amount of stress transmitted to the bone was not affected by implant length under axial loading condition, but changed in relation to the implant design with respect to the concentration of the fringes, which corresponded to the load distribution, with even more dissipation by conical implants. Bentham Open 2016-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5070426/ /pubmed/27843505 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010522 Text en © Gehrke et al.; Licensee Bentham Open https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/legalcode), which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre Frugis, Victor Lourenço Shibli, Jamil Awad Fernandez, Maria Piedad Ramirez Sánchez de Val, José Eduardo Maté Girardo, José Luis Calvo Taschieri, Silvio Corbella, Stefano Influence of Implant Design (Cylindrical and Conical) in the Load Transfer Surrounding Long (13mm) and Short (7mm) Length Implants: A Photoelastic Analysis |
title | Influence of Implant Design (Cylindrical and Conical) in the Load Transfer Surrounding Long (13mm) and Short (7mm) Length Implants: A Photoelastic Analysis |
title_full | Influence of Implant Design (Cylindrical and Conical) in the Load Transfer Surrounding Long (13mm) and Short (7mm) Length Implants: A Photoelastic Analysis |
title_fullStr | Influence of Implant Design (Cylindrical and Conical) in the Load Transfer Surrounding Long (13mm) and Short (7mm) Length Implants: A Photoelastic Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Implant Design (Cylindrical and Conical) in the Load Transfer Surrounding Long (13mm) and Short (7mm) Length Implants: A Photoelastic Analysis |
title_short | Influence of Implant Design (Cylindrical and Conical) in the Load Transfer Surrounding Long (13mm) and Short (7mm) Length Implants: A Photoelastic Analysis |
title_sort | influence of implant design (cylindrical and conical) in the load transfer surrounding long (13mm) and short (7mm) length implants: a photoelastic analysis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070426/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27843505 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874210601610010522 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gehrkesergioalexandre influenceofimplantdesigncylindricalandconicalintheloadtransfersurroundinglong13mmandshort7mmlengthimplantsaphotoelasticanalysis AT frugisvictorlourenco influenceofimplantdesigncylindricalandconicalintheloadtransfersurroundinglong13mmandshort7mmlengthimplantsaphotoelasticanalysis AT shiblijamilawad influenceofimplantdesigncylindricalandconicalintheloadtransfersurroundinglong13mmandshort7mmlengthimplantsaphotoelasticanalysis AT fernandezmariapiedadramirez influenceofimplantdesigncylindricalandconicalintheloadtransfersurroundinglong13mmandshort7mmlengthimplantsaphotoelasticanalysis AT sanchezdevaljoseeduardomate influenceofimplantdesigncylindricalandconicalintheloadtransfersurroundinglong13mmandshort7mmlengthimplantsaphotoelasticanalysis AT girardojoseluiscalvo influenceofimplantdesigncylindricalandconicalintheloadtransfersurroundinglong13mmandshort7mmlengthimplantsaphotoelasticanalysis AT taschierisilvio influenceofimplantdesigncylindricalandconicalintheloadtransfersurroundinglong13mmandshort7mmlengthimplantsaphotoelasticanalysis AT corbellastefano influenceofimplantdesigncylindricalandconicalintheloadtransfersurroundinglong13mmandshort7mmlengthimplantsaphotoelasticanalysis |