Cargando…

Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey

Objective To assess the public’s preferences regarding potential privacy threats from devices or services storing health-related personal data. Materials and Methods A pan-European survey based on a stated-preference experiment for assessing preferences for electronic health data storage, access, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patil, Sunil, Lu, Hui, Saunders, Catherine L, Potoglou, Dimitris, Robinson, Neil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27107445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw012
_version_ 1782461158564823040
author Patil, Sunil
Lu, Hui
Saunders, Catherine L
Potoglou, Dimitris
Robinson, Neil
author_facet Patil, Sunil
Lu, Hui
Saunders, Catherine L
Potoglou, Dimitris
Robinson, Neil
author_sort Patil, Sunil
collection PubMed
description Objective To assess the public’s preferences regarding potential privacy threats from devices or services storing health-related personal data. Materials and Methods A pan-European survey based on a stated-preference experiment for assessing preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing. Results We obtained 20 882 survey responses (94 606 preferences) from 27 EU member countries. Respondents recognized the benefits of storing electronic health information, with 75.5%, 63.9%, and 58.9% agreeing that storage was important for improving treatment quality, preventing epidemics, and reducing delays, respectively. Concerns about different levels of access by third parties were expressed by 48.9% to 60.6% of respondents. On average, compared to devices or systems that only store basic health status information, respondents preferred devices that also store identification data (coefficient/relative preference 95% CI = 0.04 [0.00-0.08], P = 0.034) and information on lifelong health conditions (coefficient = 0.13 [0.08 to 0.18], P < 0.001), but there was no evidence of this for devices with information on sensitive health conditions such as mental and sexual health and addictions (coefficient = −0.03 [−0.09 to 0.02], P = 0.24). Respondents were averse to their immediate family (coefficient = −0.05 [−0.05 to −0.01], P = 0.011) and home care nurses (coefficient = −0.06 [−0.11 to −0.02], P = 0.004) viewing this data, and strongly averse to health insurance companies (coefficient = −0.43 [−0.52 to 0.34], P < 0.001), private sector pharmaceutical companies (coefficient = −0.82 [−0.99 to −0.64], P < 0.001), and academic researchers (coefficient = −0.53 [−0.66 to −0.40], P < 0.001) viewing the data. Conclusions Storing more detailed electronic health data was generally preferred, but respondents were averse to wider access to and sharing of this information. When developing frameworks for the use of electronic health data, policy makers should consider approaches that both highlight the benefits to the individual and minimize the perception of privacy risks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5070520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50705202017-11-01 Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey Patil, Sunil Lu, Hui Saunders, Catherine L Potoglou, Dimitris Robinson, Neil J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications Objective To assess the public’s preferences regarding potential privacy threats from devices or services storing health-related personal data. Materials and Methods A pan-European survey based on a stated-preference experiment for assessing preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing. Results We obtained 20 882 survey responses (94 606 preferences) from 27 EU member countries. Respondents recognized the benefits of storing electronic health information, with 75.5%, 63.9%, and 58.9% agreeing that storage was important for improving treatment quality, preventing epidemics, and reducing delays, respectively. Concerns about different levels of access by third parties were expressed by 48.9% to 60.6% of respondents. On average, compared to devices or systems that only store basic health status information, respondents preferred devices that also store identification data (coefficient/relative preference 95% CI = 0.04 [0.00-0.08], P = 0.034) and information on lifelong health conditions (coefficient = 0.13 [0.08 to 0.18], P < 0.001), but there was no evidence of this for devices with information on sensitive health conditions such as mental and sexual health and addictions (coefficient = −0.03 [−0.09 to 0.02], P = 0.24). Respondents were averse to their immediate family (coefficient = −0.05 [−0.05 to −0.01], P = 0.011) and home care nurses (coefficient = −0.06 [−0.11 to −0.02], P = 0.004) viewing this data, and strongly averse to health insurance companies (coefficient = −0.43 [−0.52 to 0.34], P < 0.001), private sector pharmaceutical companies (coefficient = −0.82 [−0.99 to −0.64], P < 0.001), and academic researchers (coefficient = −0.53 [−0.66 to −0.40], P < 0.001) viewing the data. Conclusions Storing more detailed electronic health data was generally preferred, but respondents were averse to wider access to and sharing of this information. When developing frameworks for the use of electronic health data, policy makers should consider approaches that both highlight the benefits to the individual and minimize the perception of privacy risks. Oxford University Press 2016-11 2016-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5070520/ /pubmed/27107445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw012 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research and Applications
Patil, Sunil
Lu, Hui
Saunders, Catherine L
Potoglou, Dimitris
Robinson, Neil
Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey
title Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey
title_full Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey
title_fullStr Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey
title_full_unstemmed Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey
title_short Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey
title_sort public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-european survey
topic Research and Applications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27107445
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw012
work_keys_str_mv AT patilsunil publicpreferencesforelectronichealthdatastorageaccessandsharingevidencefromapaneuropeansurvey
AT luhui publicpreferencesforelectronichealthdatastorageaccessandsharingevidencefromapaneuropeansurvey
AT saunderscatherinel publicpreferencesforelectronichealthdatastorageaccessandsharingevidencefromapaneuropeansurvey
AT potogloudimitris publicpreferencesforelectronichealthdatastorageaccessandsharingevidencefromapaneuropeansurvey
AT robinsonneil publicpreferencesforelectronichealthdatastorageaccessandsharingevidencefromapaneuropeansurvey