Cargando…
Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey
Objective To assess the public’s preferences regarding potential privacy threats from devices or services storing health-related personal data. Materials and Methods A pan-European survey based on a stated-preference experiment for assessing preferences for electronic health data storage, access, an...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27107445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw012 |
_version_ | 1782461158564823040 |
---|---|
author | Patil, Sunil Lu, Hui Saunders, Catherine L Potoglou, Dimitris Robinson, Neil |
author_facet | Patil, Sunil Lu, Hui Saunders, Catherine L Potoglou, Dimitris Robinson, Neil |
author_sort | Patil, Sunil |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective To assess the public’s preferences regarding potential privacy threats from devices or services storing health-related personal data. Materials and Methods A pan-European survey based on a stated-preference experiment for assessing preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing. Results We obtained 20 882 survey responses (94 606 preferences) from 27 EU member countries. Respondents recognized the benefits of storing electronic health information, with 75.5%, 63.9%, and 58.9% agreeing that storage was important for improving treatment quality, preventing epidemics, and reducing delays, respectively. Concerns about different levels of access by third parties were expressed by 48.9% to 60.6% of respondents. On average, compared to devices or systems that only store basic health status information, respondents preferred devices that also store identification data (coefficient/relative preference 95% CI = 0.04 [0.00-0.08], P = 0.034) and information on lifelong health conditions (coefficient = 0.13 [0.08 to 0.18], P < 0.001), but there was no evidence of this for devices with information on sensitive health conditions such as mental and sexual health and addictions (coefficient = −0.03 [−0.09 to 0.02], P = 0.24). Respondents were averse to their immediate family (coefficient = −0.05 [−0.05 to −0.01], P = 0.011) and home care nurses (coefficient = −0.06 [−0.11 to −0.02], P = 0.004) viewing this data, and strongly averse to health insurance companies (coefficient = −0.43 [−0.52 to 0.34], P < 0.001), private sector pharmaceutical companies (coefficient = −0.82 [−0.99 to −0.64], P < 0.001), and academic researchers (coefficient = −0.53 [−0.66 to −0.40], P < 0.001) viewing the data. Conclusions Storing more detailed electronic health data was generally preferred, but respondents were averse to wider access to and sharing of this information. When developing frameworks for the use of electronic health data, policy makers should consider approaches that both highlight the benefits to the individual and minimize the perception of privacy risks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5070520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50705202017-11-01 Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey Patil, Sunil Lu, Hui Saunders, Catherine L Potoglou, Dimitris Robinson, Neil J Am Med Inform Assoc Research and Applications Objective To assess the public’s preferences regarding potential privacy threats from devices or services storing health-related personal data. Materials and Methods A pan-European survey based on a stated-preference experiment for assessing preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing. Results We obtained 20 882 survey responses (94 606 preferences) from 27 EU member countries. Respondents recognized the benefits of storing electronic health information, with 75.5%, 63.9%, and 58.9% agreeing that storage was important for improving treatment quality, preventing epidemics, and reducing delays, respectively. Concerns about different levels of access by third parties were expressed by 48.9% to 60.6% of respondents. On average, compared to devices or systems that only store basic health status information, respondents preferred devices that also store identification data (coefficient/relative preference 95% CI = 0.04 [0.00-0.08], P = 0.034) and information on lifelong health conditions (coefficient = 0.13 [0.08 to 0.18], P < 0.001), but there was no evidence of this for devices with information on sensitive health conditions such as mental and sexual health and addictions (coefficient = −0.03 [−0.09 to 0.02], P = 0.24). Respondents were averse to their immediate family (coefficient = −0.05 [−0.05 to −0.01], P = 0.011) and home care nurses (coefficient = −0.06 [−0.11 to −0.02], P = 0.004) viewing this data, and strongly averse to health insurance companies (coefficient = −0.43 [−0.52 to 0.34], P < 0.001), private sector pharmaceutical companies (coefficient = −0.82 [−0.99 to −0.64], P < 0.001), and academic researchers (coefficient = −0.53 [−0.66 to −0.40], P < 0.001) viewing the data. Conclusions Storing more detailed electronic health data was generally preferred, but respondents were averse to wider access to and sharing of this information. When developing frameworks for the use of electronic health data, policy makers should consider approaches that both highlight the benefits to the individual and minimize the perception of privacy risks. Oxford University Press 2016-11 2016-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5070520/ /pubmed/27107445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw012 Text en © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research and Applications Patil, Sunil Lu, Hui Saunders, Catherine L Potoglou, Dimitris Robinson, Neil Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey |
title | Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey |
title_full | Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey |
title_fullStr | Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey |
title_short | Public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-European survey |
title_sort | public preferences for electronic health data storage, access, and sharing — evidence from a pan-european survey |
topic | Research and Applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27107445 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT patilsunil publicpreferencesforelectronichealthdatastorageaccessandsharingevidencefromapaneuropeansurvey AT luhui publicpreferencesforelectronichealthdatastorageaccessandsharingevidencefromapaneuropeansurvey AT saunderscatherinel publicpreferencesforelectronichealthdatastorageaccessandsharingevidencefromapaneuropeansurvey AT potogloudimitris publicpreferencesforelectronichealthdatastorageaccessandsharingevidencefromapaneuropeansurvey AT robinsonneil publicpreferencesforelectronichealthdatastorageaccessandsharingevidencefromapaneuropeansurvey |