Cargando…
Discriminating the Difference between Remote and Close Association with Relation to White-Matter Structural Connectivity
Remote association is a core ability that influences creative output. In contrast to close association, remote association is commonly agreed to be connected with more original and unique concepts. However, although existing studies have discovered that creativity is closely related to the white-mat...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27760177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165053 |
_version_ | 1782461193661710336 |
---|---|
author | Wu, Chinglin Zhong, Suyu Chen, Hsuehchih |
author_facet | Wu, Chinglin Zhong, Suyu Chen, Hsuehchih |
author_sort | Wu, Chinglin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Remote association is a core ability that influences creative output. In contrast to close association, remote association is commonly agreed to be connected with more original and unique concepts. However, although existing studies have discovered that creativity is closely related to the white-matter structure of the brain, there are no studies that examine the relevance between the connectivity efficiencies and creativity of the brain regions from the perspective of networks. Consequently, this study constructed a brain white matter network structure that consisted of cerebral tissues and nerve fibers and used graph theory to analyze the connection efficiencies among the network nodes, further illuminating the differences between remote and close association in relation to the connectivity of the brain network. Researchers analyzed correlations between the scores of 35 healthy adults with regard to remote and close associations and the connectivity efficiencies of the white-matter network of the brain. Controlling for gender, age, and verbal intelligence, the remote association positively correlated with the global efficiency and negatively correlated with the levels of small-world. A close association negatively correlated with the global efficiency. Notably, the node efficiency in the middle temporal gyrus (MTG) positively correlated with remote association and negatively correlated with close association. To summarize, remote and close associations work differently as patterns in the brain network. Remote association requires efficient and convenient mutual connections between different brain regions, while close association emphasizes the limited connections that exist in a local region. These results are consistent with previous results, which indicate that creativity is based on the efficient integration and connection between different regions of the brain and that temporal lobes are the key regions for discriminating remote and close associations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5070771 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50707712016-10-27 Discriminating the Difference between Remote and Close Association with Relation to White-Matter Structural Connectivity Wu, Chinglin Zhong, Suyu Chen, Hsuehchih PLoS One Research Article Remote association is a core ability that influences creative output. In contrast to close association, remote association is commonly agreed to be connected with more original and unique concepts. However, although existing studies have discovered that creativity is closely related to the white-matter structure of the brain, there are no studies that examine the relevance between the connectivity efficiencies and creativity of the brain regions from the perspective of networks. Consequently, this study constructed a brain white matter network structure that consisted of cerebral tissues and nerve fibers and used graph theory to analyze the connection efficiencies among the network nodes, further illuminating the differences between remote and close association in relation to the connectivity of the brain network. Researchers analyzed correlations between the scores of 35 healthy adults with regard to remote and close associations and the connectivity efficiencies of the white-matter network of the brain. Controlling for gender, age, and verbal intelligence, the remote association positively correlated with the global efficiency and negatively correlated with the levels of small-world. A close association negatively correlated with the global efficiency. Notably, the node efficiency in the middle temporal gyrus (MTG) positively correlated with remote association and negatively correlated with close association. To summarize, remote and close associations work differently as patterns in the brain network. Remote association requires efficient and convenient mutual connections between different brain regions, while close association emphasizes the limited connections that exist in a local region. These results are consistent with previous results, which indicate that creativity is based on the efficient integration and connection between different regions of the brain and that temporal lobes are the key regions for discriminating remote and close associations. Public Library of Science 2016-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5070771/ /pubmed/27760177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165053 Text en © 2016 Wu et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wu, Chinglin Zhong, Suyu Chen, Hsuehchih Discriminating the Difference between Remote and Close Association with Relation to White-Matter Structural Connectivity |
title | Discriminating the Difference between Remote and Close Association with Relation to White-Matter Structural Connectivity |
title_full | Discriminating the Difference between Remote and Close Association with Relation to White-Matter Structural Connectivity |
title_fullStr | Discriminating the Difference between Remote and Close Association with Relation to White-Matter Structural Connectivity |
title_full_unstemmed | Discriminating the Difference between Remote and Close Association with Relation to White-Matter Structural Connectivity |
title_short | Discriminating the Difference between Remote and Close Association with Relation to White-Matter Structural Connectivity |
title_sort | discriminating the difference between remote and close association with relation to white-matter structural connectivity |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5070771/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27760177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165053 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wuchinglin discriminatingthedifferencebetweenremoteandcloseassociationwithrelationtowhitematterstructuralconnectivity AT zhongsuyu discriminatingthedifferencebetweenremoteandcloseassociationwithrelationtowhitematterstructuralconnectivity AT chenhsuehchih discriminatingthedifferencebetweenremoteandcloseassociationwithrelationtowhitematterstructuralconnectivity |