Cargando…

Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature

In the context of customized patient care for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), decision-making could be facilitated by risk assessment and prediction tools. The aim of this study was to provide a critical overview of existing predictive models and to review emerging promising prognostic fact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mbeutcha, Aurélie, Mathieu, Romain, Rouprêt, Morgan, Gust, Kilian M., Briganti, Alberto, Karakiewicz, Pierre I., Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5071205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27785429
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.09.07
_version_ 1782461250047836160
author Mbeutcha, Aurélie
Mathieu, Romain
Rouprêt, Morgan
Gust, Kilian M.
Briganti, Alberto
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
author_facet Mbeutcha, Aurélie
Mathieu, Romain
Rouprêt, Morgan
Gust, Kilian M.
Briganti, Alberto
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
author_sort Mbeutcha, Aurélie
collection PubMed
description In the context of customized patient care for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), decision-making could be facilitated by risk assessment and prediction tools. The aim of this study was to provide a critical overview of existing predictive models and to review emerging promising prognostic factors for UTUC. A literature search of articles published in English from January 2000 to June 2016 was performed using PubMed. Studies on risk group stratification models and predictive tools in UTUC were selected, together with studies on predictive factors and biomarkers associated with advanced-stage UTUC and oncological outcomes after surgery. Various predictive tools have been described for advanced-stage UTUC assessment, disease recurrence and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Most of these models are based on well-established prognostic factors such as tumor stage, grade and lymph node (LN) metastasis, but some also integrate newly described prognostic factors and biomarkers. These new prediction tools seem to reach a high level of accuracy, but they lack external validation and decision-making analysis. The combinations of patient-, pathology- and surgery-related factors together with novel biomarkers have led to promising predictive tools for oncological outcomes in UTUC. However, external validation of these predictive models is a prerequisite before their introduction into daily practice. New models predicting response to therapy are urgently needed to allow accurate and safe individualized management in this heterogeneous disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5071205
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50712052016-10-26 Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature Mbeutcha, Aurélie Mathieu, Romain Rouprêt, Morgan Gust, Kilian M. Briganti, Alberto Karakiewicz, Pierre I. Shariat, Shahrokh F. Transl Androl Urol Review Article In the context of customized patient care for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), decision-making could be facilitated by risk assessment and prediction tools. The aim of this study was to provide a critical overview of existing predictive models and to review emerging promising prognostic factors for UTUC. A literature search of articles published in English from January 2000 to June 2016 was performed using PubMed. Studies on risk group stratification models and predictive tools in UTUC were selected, together with studies on predictive factors and biomarkers associated with advanced-stage UTUC and oncological outcomes after surgery. Various predictive tools have been described for advanced-stage UTUC assessment, disease recurrence and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Most of these models are based on well-established prognostic factors such as tumor stage, grade and lymph node (LN) metastasis, but some also integrate newly described prognostic factors and biomarkers. These new prediction tools seem to reach a high level of accuracy, but they lack external validation and decision-making analysis. The combinations of patient-, pathology- and surgery-related factors together with novel biomarkers have led to promising predictive tools for oncological outcomes in UTUC. However, external validation of these predictive models is a prerequisite before their introduction into daily practice. New models predicting response to therapy are urgently needed to allow accurate and safe individualized management in this heterogeneous disease. AME Publishing Company 2016-10 /pmc/articles/PMC5071205/ /pubmed/27785429 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.09.07 Text en 2016 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved.
spellingShingle Review Article
Mbeutcha, Aurélie
Mathieu, Romain
Rouprêt, Morgan
Gust, Kilian M.
Briganti, Alberto
Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
Shariat, Shahrokh F.
Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature
title Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature
title_full Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature
title_fullStr Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature
title_short Predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature
title_sort predictive models and prognostic factors for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a comprehensive review of the literature
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5071205/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27785429
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau.2016.09.07
work_keys_str_mv AT mbeutchaaurelie predictivemodelsandprognosticfactorsforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaacomprehensivereviewoftheliterature
AT mathieuromain predictivemodelsandprognosticfactorsforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaacomprehensivereviewoftheliterature
AT roupretmorgan predictivemodelsandprognosticfactorsforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaacomprehensivereviewoftheliterature
AT gustkilianm predictivemodelsandprognosticfactorsforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaacomprehensivereviewoftheliterature
AT brigantialberto predictivemodelsandprognosticfactorsforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaacomprehensivereviewoftheliterature
AT karakiewiczpierrei predictivemodelsandprognosticfactorsforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaacomprehensivereviewoftheliterature
AT shariatshahrokhf predictivemodelsandprognosticfactorsforuppertracturothelialcarcinomaacomprehensivereviewoftheliterature