Cargando…
Pedometer intervention and weight loss in overweight and obese adults with Type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis
AIM: Although pedometer intervention is effective in increasing physical activity among adults with Type 2 diabetes, its impact on weight loss remains unclear. This meta‐analysis was aimed to assess whether pedometer intervention promotes weight loss. METHODS: Three different databases were searched...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5071725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26926674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13104 |
_version_ | 1782461316335665152 |
---|---|
author | Cai, X. Qiu, S. H. Yin, H. Sun, Z. L. Ju, C. P. Zügel, M. Steinacker, J. M. Schumann, U. |
author_facet | Cai, X. Qiu, S. H. Yin, H. Sun, Z. L. Ju, C. P. Zügel, M. Steinacker, J. M. Schumann, U. |
author_sort | Cai, X. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: Although pedometer intervention is effective in increasing physical activity among adults with Type 2 diabetes, its impact on weight loss remains unclear. This meta‐analysis was aimed to assess whether pedometer intervention promotes weight loss. METHODS: Three different databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English up to April 2015. Studies were included if they investigated the effects of pedometer intervention on weight loss, as measured by BMI or weight. Effect sizes were aggregated using a random‐effects model. Subgroup and meta‐regression analyses were used to identify potential moderators. Eleven RCTs with 1258 participants were included. All enrolled participants were overweight or obese. RESULTS: Pedometer intervention led to significantly decreased BMI [weighted mean difference (WMD) −0.15 kg/m(2), 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.29 to −0.02 kg/m(2)] and reduced weight (WMD −0.65 kg, 95% CI −1.12 to −0.17 kg). Dietary counselling seemed to be a key predictor of the observed changes. However, none of the following variables had a significant influence: step goal setting, baseline age, BMI, weight, sex distribution, disease duration, intervention duration, and baseline values or change scores for total or moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity. After completion of the pedometer intervention, non‐significant declines in BMI and weight were observed during the follow‐up periods. CONCLUSIONS: Pedometer intervention promotes modest weight loss, but its association with physical activity requires further clarification. Future studies are also required to document dietary and sedentary behaviour changes to facilitate the use of pedometers for weight loss in overweight and obese adults with Type 2 diabetes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5071725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50717252016-11-02 Pedometer intervention and weight loss in overweight and obese adults with Type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis Cai, X. Qiu, S. H. Yin, H. Sun, Z. L. Ju, C. P. Zügel, M. Steinacker, J. M. Schumann, U. Diabet Med Systematic Review or Meta‐analysis AIM: Although pedometer intervention is effective in increasing physical activity among adults with Type 2 diabetes, its impact on weight loss remains unclear. This meta‐analysis was aimed to assess whether pedometer intervention promotes weight loss. METHODS: Three different databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English up to April 2015. Studies were included if they investigated the effects of pedometer intervention on weight loss, as measured by BMI or weight. Effect sizes were aggregated using a random‐effects model. Subgroup and meta‐regression analyses were used to identify potential moderators. Eleven RCTs with 1258 participants were included. All enrolled participants were overweight or obese. RESULTS: Pedometer intervention led to significantly decreased BMI [weighted mean difference (WMD) −0.15 kg/m(2), 95% confidence interval (CI) −0.29 to −0.02 kg/m(2)] and reduced weight (WMD −0.65 kg, 95% CI −1.12 to −0.17 kg). Dietary counselling seemed to be a key predictor of the observed changes. However, none of the following variables had a significant influence: step goal setting, baseline age, BMI, weight, sex distribution, disease duration, intervention duration, and baseline values or change scores for total or moderate‐to‐vigorous physical activity. After completion of the pedometer intervention, non‐significant declines in BMI and weight were observed during the follow‐up periods. CONCLUSIONS: Pedometer intervention promotes modest weight loss, but its association with physical activity requires further clarification. Future studies are also required to document dietary and sedentary behaviour changes to facilitate the use of pedometers for weight loss in overweight and obese adults with Type 2 diabetes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-03-25 2016-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5071725/ /pubmed/26926674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13104 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review or Meta‐analysis Cai, X. Qiu, S. H. Yin, H. Sun, Z. L. Ju, C. P. Zügel, M. Steinacker, J. M. Schumann, U. Pedometer intervention and weight loss in overweight and obese adults with Type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis |
title | Pedometer intervention and weight loss in overweight and obese adults with Type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis |
title_full | Pedometer intervention and weight loss in overweight and obese adults with Type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Pedometer intervention and weight loss in overweight and obese adults with Type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Pedometer intervention and weight loss in overweight and obese adults with Type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis |
title_short | Pedometer intervention and weight loss in overweight and obese adults with Type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis |
title_sort | pedometer intervention and weight loss in overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta‐analysis |
topic | Systematic Review or Meta‐analysis |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5071725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26926674 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dme.13104 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caix pedometerinterventionandweightlossinoverweightandobeseadultswithtype2diabetesametaanalysis AT qiush pedometerinterventionandweightlossinoverweightandobeseadultswithtype2diabetesametaanalysis AT yinh pedometerinterventionandweightlossinoverweightandobeseadultswithtype2diabetesametaanalysis AT sunzl pedometerinterventionandweightlossinoverweightandobeseadultswithtype2diabetesametaanalysis AT jucp pedometerinterventionandweightlossinoverweightandobeseadultswithtype2diabetesametaanalysis AT zugelm pedometerinterventionandweightlossinoverweightandobeseadultswithtype2diabetesametaanalysis AT steinackerjm pedometerinterventionandweightlossinoverweightandobeseadultswithtype2diabetesametaanalysis AT schumannu pedometerinterventionandweightlossinoverweightandobeseadultswithtype2diabetesametaanalysis |