Cargando…

Machine-learned pattern identification in olfactory subtest results

The human sense of smell is often analyzed as being composed of three main components comprising olfactory threshold, odor discrimination and the ability to identify odors. A relevant distinction of the three components and their differential changes in distinct disorders remains a research focus. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lötsch, Jörn, Hummel, Thomas, Ultsch, Alfred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5071836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27762302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35688
_version_ 1782461334070231040
author Lötsch, Jörn
Hummel, Thomas
Ultsch, Alfred
author_facet Lötsch, Jörn
Hummel, Thomas
Ultsch, Alfred
author_sort Lötsch, Jörn
collection PubMed
description The human sense of smell is often analyzed as being composed of three main components comprising olfactory threshold, odor discrimination and the ability to identify odors. A relevant distinction of the three components and their differential changes in distinct disorders remains a research focus. The present data-driven analysis aimed at establishing a cluster structure in the pattern of olfactory subtest results. Therefore, unsupervised machine-learning was applied onto olfactory subtest results acquired in 10,714 subjects with nine different olfactory pathologies. Using the U-matrix, Emergent Self-organizing feature maps (ESOM) identified three different clusters characterized by (i) low threshold and good discrimination and identification, (ii) very high threshold associated with absent to poor discrimination and identification ability, or (iii) medium threshold, i.e., in the mid-range of possible thresholds, associated with reduced discrimination and identification ability. Specific etiologies of olfactory (dys)function were unequally represented in the clusters (p < 2.2 · 10(−16)). Patients with congenital anosmia were overrepresented in the second cluster while subjects with postinfectious olfactory dysfunction belonged frequently to the third cluster. However, the clusters provided no clear separation between etiologies. Hence, the present verification of a distinct cluster structure encourages continued scientific efforts at olfactory test pattern recognition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5071836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50718362016-10-26 Machine-learned pattern identification in olfactory subtest results Lötsch, Jörn Hummel, Thomas Ultsch, Alfred Sci Rep Article The human sense of smell is often analyzed as being composed of three main components comprising olfactory threshold, odor discrimination and the ability to identify odors. A relevant distinction of the three components and their differential changes in distinct disorders remains a research focus. The present data-driven analysis aimed at establishing a cluster structure in the pattern of olfactory subtest results. Therefore, unsupervised machine-learning was applied onto olfactory subtest results acquired in 10,714 subjects with nine different olfactory pathologies. Using the U-matrix, Emergent Self-organizing feature maps (ESOM) identified three different clusters characterized by (i) low threshold and good discrimination and identification, (ii) very high threshold associated with absent to poor discrimination and identification ability, or (iii) medium threshold, i.e., in the mid-range of possible thresholds, associated with reduced discrimination and identification ability. Specific etiologies of olfactory (dys)function were unequally represented in the clusters (p < 2.2 · 10(−16)). Patients with congenital anosmia were overrepresented in the second cluster while subjects with postinfectious olfactory dysfunction belonged frequently to the third cluster. However, the clusters provided no clear separation between etiologies. Hence, the present verification of a distinct cluster structure encourages continued scientific efforts at olfactory test pattern recognition. Nature Publishing Group 2016-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5071836/ /pubmed/27762302 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35688 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Lötsch, Jörn
Hummel, Thomas
Ultsch, Alfred
Machine-learned pattern identification in olfactory subtest results
title Machine-learned pattern identification in olfactory subtest results
title_full Machine-learned pattern identification in olfactory subtest results
title_fullStr Machine-learned pattern identification in olfactory subtest results
title_full_unstemmed Machine-learned pattern identification in olfactory subtest results
title_short Machine-learned pattern identification in olfactory subtest results
title_sort machine-learned pattern identification in olfactory subtest results
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5071836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27762302
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep35688
work_keys_str_mv AT lotschjorn machinelearnedpatternidentificationinolfactorysubtestresults
AT hummelthomas machinelearnedpatternidentificationinolfactorysubtestresults
AT ultschalfred machinelearnedpatternidentificationinolfactorysubtestresults