Cargando…

Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH

Chromosome conformation capture (3C)-based techniques have revolutionized the field of nuclear organization, partly replacing DNA FISH as the method of choice for studying three-dimensional chromosome architecture. Although DNA FISH is commonly used for confirming 3C-based findings, the two techniqu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Giorgetti, Luca, Heard, Edith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27760553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1081-2
_version_ 1782461384591671296
author Giorgetti, Luca
Heard, Edith
author_facet Giorgetti, Luca
Heard, Edith
author_sort Giorgetti, Luca
collection PubMed
description Chromosome conformation capture (3C)-based techniques have revolutionized the field of nuclear organization, partly replacing DNA FISH as the method of choice for studying three-dimensional chromosome architecture. Although DNA FISH is commonly used for confirming 3C-based findings, the two techniques are conceptually and technically different and comparing their results is not trivial. Here, we discuss both 3C-based techniques and DNA FISH approaches to highlight their similarities and differences. We then describe the technical biases that affect each approach, and review the available reports that address their compatibility. Finally, we propose an experimental scheme for comparison of 3C and DNA FISH results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5072311
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50723112016-10-24 Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH Giorgetti, Luca Heard, Edith Genome Biol Review Chromosome conformation capture (3C)-based techniques have revolutionized the field of nuclear organization, partly replacing DNA FISH as the method of choice for studying three-dimensional chromosome architecture. Although DNA FISH is commonly used for confirming 3C-based findings, the two techniques are conceptually and technically different and comparing their results is not trivial. Here, we discuss both 3C-based techniques and DNA FISH approaches to highlight their similarities and differences. We then describe the technical biases that affect each approach, and review the available reports that address their compatibility. Finally, we propose an experimental scheme for comparison of 3C and DNA FISH results. BioMed Central 2016-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5072311/ /pubmed/27760553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1081-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Giorgetti, Luca
Heard, Edith
Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH
title Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH
title_full Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH
title_fullStr Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH
title_full_unstemmed Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH
title_short Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH
title_sort closing the loop: 3c versus dna fish
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072311/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27760553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1081-2
work_keys_str_mv AT giorgettiluca closingtheloop3cversusdnafish
AT heardedith closingtheloop3cversusdnafish