Cargando…
Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH
Chromosome conformation capture (3C)-based techniques have revolutionized the field of nuclear organization, partly replacing DNA FISH as the method of choice for studying three-dimensional chromosome architecture. Although DNA FISH is commonly used for confirming 3C-based findings, the two techniqu...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27760553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1081-2 |
_version_ | 1782461384591671296 |
---|---|
author | Giorgetti, Luca Heard, Edith |
author_facet | Giorgetti, Luca Heard, Edith |
author_sort | Giorgetti, Luca |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chromosome conformation capture (3C)-based techniques have revolutionized the field of nuclear organization, partly replacing DNA FISH as the method of choice for studying three-dimensional chromosome architecture. Although DNA FISH is commonly used for confirming 3C-based findings, the two techniques are conceptually and technically different and comparing their results is not trivial. Here, we discuss both 3C-based techniques and DNA FISH approaches to highlight their similarities and differences. We then describe the technical biases that affect each approach, and review the available reports that address their compatibility. Finally, we propose an experimental scheme for comparison of 3C and DNA FISH results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5072311 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50723112016-10-24 Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH Giorgetti, Luca Heard, Edith Genome Biol Review Chromosome conformation capture (3C)-based techniques have revolutionized the field of nuclear organization, partly replacing DNA FISH as the method of choice for studying three-dimensional chromosome architecture. Although DNA FISH is commonly used for confirming 3C-based findings, the two techniques are conceptually and technically different and comparing their results is not trivial. Here, we discuss both 3C-based techniques and DNA FISH approaches to highlight their similarities and differences. We then describe the technical biases that affect each approach, and review the available reports that address their compatibility. Finally, we propose an experimental scheme for comparison of 3C and DNA FISH results. BioMed Central 2016-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5072311/ /pubmed/27760553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1081-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Review Giorgetti, Luca Heard, Edith Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH |
title | Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH |
title_full | Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH |
title_fullStr | Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH |
title_full_unstemmed | Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH |
title_short | Closing the loop: 3C versus DNA FISH |
title_sort | closing the loop: 3c versus dna fish |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072311/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27760553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13059-016-1081-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT giorgettiluca closingtheloop3cversusdnafish AT heardedith closingtheloop3cversusdnafish |