Cargando…

Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience

PURPOSE: Both gefitinib and pemetrexed maintenance were effective therapies for advanced lung adenocarcinoma, but which is better is unclear. For patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, we have no idea whether we should choose gefitinib or pemetrexed maintenance in clinical practice. Here, we as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Liping, Zhao, Juanjuan, Hu, Jiazhu, Huang, Fuxi, Han, Jianjun, He, Yan, Cao, Xiaolong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27789961
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S113374
_version_ 1782461403860303872
author Lin, Liping
Zhao, Juanjuan
Hu, Jiazhu
Huang, Fuxi
Han, Jianjun
He, Yan
Cao, Xiaolong
author_facet Lin, Liping
Zhao, Juanjuan
Hu, Jiazhu
Huang, Fuxi
Han, Jianjun
He, Yan
Cao, Xiaolong
author_sort Lin, Liping
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Both gefitinib and pemetrexed maintenance were effective therapies for advanced lung adenocarcinoma, but which is better is unclear. For patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, we have no idea whether we should choose gefitinib or pemetrexed maintenance in clinical practice. Here, we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib versus pemetrexed maintenance in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 101 patients were identified and divided into gefitinib (n=53) or pemetrexed (n=48) maintenance. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status of tumors was analyzed in 67 patients. Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The results showed that DCR (79.2% vs 75%, P=0.642) was similar between gefitinib and pemetrexed groups. The PFS of gefitinib was significantly longer than that of pemetrexed (8 months vs 5.4 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.520, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.341–0.791, P=0.002); however, the OS was similar (19.9 months vs 18.8 months, HR: 1.006, 95% CI: 0.664–1.525, P=0.977). In EGFR mutation-positive patients, PFS was significantly longer in gefitinib (12 months vs 5.4 months; HR: 0.158, 95% CI: 0.074–0.333, P<0.001), whereas in EGFR wild-type subgroup gefitinib had a significantly shorter PFS than that by pemetrexed (2.5 months vs 5 months; HR: 2.822, 95% CI: 1.137–7.005, P=0.025). Cox multivariate regression analysis of PFS for overall population showed that smoking status (P=0.001) and maintenance regimens (P=0.013) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Both gefitinib and pemetrexed were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib compared with pemetrexed as maintenance therapy had a significantly longer PFS and a similar OS with good tolerability in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Moreover, for EGFR mutation-positive patients, gefitinib maintenance had a significantly longer PFS; however, pemetrexed maintenance was considered more effective for EGFR wild-type patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5072510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50725102016-10-27 Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience Lin, Liping Zhao, Juanjuan Hu, Jiazhu Huang, Fuxi Han, Jianjun He, Yan Cao, Xiaolong Onco Targets Ther Original Research PURPOSE: Both gefitinib and pemetrexed maintenance were effective therapies for advanced lung adenocarcinoma, but which is better is unclear. For patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, we have no idea whether we should choose gefitinib or pemetrexed maintenance in clinical practice. Here, we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib versus pemetrexed maintenance in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 101 patients were identified and divided into gefitinib (n=53) or pemetrexed (n=48) maintenance. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status of tumors was analyzed in 67 patients. Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The results showed that DCR (79.2% vs 75%, P=0.642) was similar between gefitinib and pemetrexed groups. The PFS of gefitinib was significantly longer than that of pemetrexed (8 months vs 5.4 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.520, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.341–0.791, P=0.002); however, the OS was similar (19.9 months vs 18.8 months, HR: 1.006, 95% CI: 0.664–1.525, P=0.977). In EGFR mutation-positive patients, PFS was significantly longer in gefitinib (12 months vs 5.4 months; HR: 0.158, 95% CI: 0.074–0.333, P<0.001), whereas in EGFR wild-type subgroup gefitinib had a significantly shorter PFS than that by pemetrexed (2.5 months vs 5 months; HR: 2.822, 95% CI: 1.137–7.005, P=0.025). Cox multivariate regression analysis of PFS for overall population showed that smoking status (P=0.001) and maintenance regimens (P=0.013) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Both gefitinib and pemetrexed were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib compared with pemetrexed as maintenance therapy had a significantly longer PFS and a similar OS with good tolerability in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Moreover, for EGFR mutation-positive patients, gefitinib maintenance had a significantly longer PFS; however, pemetrexed maintenance was considered more effective for EGFR wild-type patients. Dove Medical Press 2016-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5072510/ /pubmed/27789961 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S113374 Text en © 2016 Lin et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lin, Liping
Zhao, Juanjuan
Hu, Jiazhu
Huang, Fuxi
Han, Jianjun
He, Yan
Cao, Xiaolong
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience
title Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience
title_full Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience
title_short Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27789961
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S113374
work_keys_str_mv AT linliping comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience
AT zhaojuanjuan comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience
AT hujiazhu comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience
AT huangfuxi comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience
AT hanjianjun comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience
AT heyan comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience
AT caoxiaolong comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience