Cargando…
Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience
PURPOSE: Both gefitinib and pemetrexed maintenance were effective therapies for advanced lung adenocarcinoma, but which is better is unclear. For patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, we have no idea whether we should choose gefitinib or pemetrexed maintenance in clinical practice. Here, we as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27789961 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S113374 |
_version_ | 1782461403860303872 |
---|---|
author | Lin, Liping Zhao, Juanjuan Hu, Jiazhu Huang, Fuxi Han, Jianjun He, Yan Cao, Xiaolong |
author_facet | Lin, Liping Zhao, Juanjuan Hu, Jiazhu Huang, Fuxi Han, Jianjun He, Yan Cao, Xiaolong |
author_sort | Lin, Liping |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Both gefitinib and pemetrexed maintenance were effective therapies for advanced lung adenocarcinoma, but which is better is unclear. For patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, we have no idea whether we should choose gefitinib or pemetrexed maintenance in clinical practice. Here, we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib versus pemetrexed maintenance in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 101 patients were identified and divided into gefitinib (n=53) or pemetrexed (n=48) maintenance. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status of tumors was analyzed in 67 patients. Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The results showed that DCR (79.2% vs 75%, P=0.642) was similar between gefitinib and pemetrexed groups. The PFS of gefitinib was significantly longer than that of pemetrexed (8 months vs 5.4 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.520, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.341–0.791, P=0.002); however, the OS was similar (19.9 months vs 18.8 months, HR: 1.006, 95% CI: 0.664–1.525, P=0.977). In EGFR mutation-positive patients, PFS was significantly longer in gefitinib (12 months vs 5.4 months; HR: 0.158, 95% CI: 0.074–0.333, P<0.001), whereas in EGFR wild-type subgroup gefitinib had a significantly shorter PFS than that by pemetrexed (2.5 months vs 5 months; HR: 2.822, 95% CI: 1.137–7.005, P=0.025). Cox multivariate regression analysis of PFS for overall population showed that smoking status (P=0.001) and maintenance regimens (P=0.013) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Both gefitinib and pemetrexed were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib compared with pemetrexed as maintenance therapy had a significantly longer PFS and a similar OS with good tolerability in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Moreover, for EGFR mutation-positive patients, gefitinib maintenance had a significantly longer PFS; however, pemetrexed maintenance was considered more effective for EGFR wild-type patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5072510 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-50725102016-10-27 Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience Lin, Liping Zhao, Juanjuan Hu, Jiazhu Huang, Fuxi Han, Jianjun He, Yan Cao, Xiaolong Onco Targets Ther Original Research PURPOSE: Both gefitinib and pemetrexed maintenance were effective therapies for advanced lung adenocarcinoma, but which is better is unclear. For patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, we have no idea whether we should choose gefitinib or pemetrexed maintenance in clinical practice. Here, we assessed the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib versus pemetrexed maintenance in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 101 patients were identified and divided into gefitinib (n=53) or pemetrexed (n=48) maintenance. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status of tumors was analyzed in 67 patients. Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The results showed that DCR (79.2% vs 75%, P=0.642) was similar between gefitinib and pemetrexed groups. The PFS of gefitinib was significantly longer than that of pemetrexed (8 months vs 5.4 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.520, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.341–0.791, P=0.002); however, the OS was similar (19.9 months vs 18.8 months, HR: 1.006, 95% CI: 0.664–1.525, P=0.977). In EGFR mutation-positive patients, PFS was significantly longer in gefitinib (12 months vs 5.4 months; HR: 0.158, 95% CI: 0.074–0.333, P<0.001), whereas in EGFR wild-type subgroup gefitinib had a significantly shorter PFS than that by pemetrexed (2.5 months vs 5 months; HR: 2.822, 95% CI: 1.137–7.005, P=0.025). Cox multivariate regression analysis of PFS for overall population showed that smoking status (P=0.001) and maintenance regimens (P=0.013) were independent prognostic factors for PFS. Both gefitinib and pemetrexed were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib compared with pemetrexed as maintenance therapy had a significantly longer PFS and a similar OS with good tolerability in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Moreover, for EGFR mutation-positive patients, gefitinib maintenance had a significantly longer PFS; however, pemetrexed maintenance was considered more effective for EGFR wild-type patients. Dove Medical Press 2016-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5072510/ /pubmed/27789961 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S113374 Text en © 2016 Lin et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lin, Liping Zhao, Juanjuan Hu, Jiazhu Huang, Fuxi Han, Jianjun He, Yan Cao, Xiaolong Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience |
title | Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience |
title_full | Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience |
title_short | Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience |
title_sort | comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of gefitinib with pemetrexed maintenance after first-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: single-center experience |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072510/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27789961 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S113374 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linliping comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience AT zhaojuanjuan comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience AT hujiazhu comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience AT huangfuxi comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience AT hanjianjun comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience AT heyan comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience AT caoxiaolong comparisonoftheefficacyandtolerabilityofgefitinibwithpemetrexedmaintenanceafterfirstlineplatinumbaseddoubletchemotherapyinadvancedlungadenocarcinomasinglecenterexperience |