Cargando…

Urinary Analysis of Fluid Retention in the General Population: A Cross-Sectional Study

OBJECTIVE: Renal conservation (retention) of fluid might affect the outcome of hospital care and can be indicated by increased urinary concentrations of metabolic waste products. We obtained a reference material for further studies by exploring the prevalence of fluid retention in a healthy populati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hahn, Robert G., Grankvist, Nina, Krizhanovskii, Camilla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27764121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164152
_version_ 1782461445575802880
author Hahn, Robert G.
Grankvist, Nina
Krizhanovskii, Camilla
author_facet Hahn, Robert G.
Grankvist, Nina
Krizhanovskii, Camilla
author_sort Hahn, Robert G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Renal conservation (retention) of fluid might affect the outcome of hospital care and can be indicated by increased urinary concentrations of metabolic waste products. We obtained a reference material for further studies by exploring the prevalence of fluid retention in a healthy population. METHODS: Spot urine sampling was performed in 300 healthy hospital workers. A previously validated algorithm summarized the urine-specific gravity, osmolality, creatinine, and color to a fluid retention index (FRI), where 4.0 is the cut-off for fluid retention consistent with dehydration. In 50 of the volunteers, we also studied the relationships between FRI, plasma osmolality, and water-retaining hormones. RESULTS: The cut-off for fluid retention (FRI ≥ 4.0) was reached by 38% of the population. No correlation was found between the FRI and the time of the day of urine sample collection, and the FRI was only marginally correlated with the time period spent without fluid intake. Volunteers with fluid retention were younger, generally men, and more often had albuminuria (88% vs. 34%, P < 0.001). Plasma osmolality and plasma sodium were somewhat higher in those with a high FRI (mean 294.8 vs. 293.4 mosmol/kg and 140.3 vs. 139.9 mmol/l). Plasma vasopressin was consistently below the limit of detection, and the plasma cortisol, aldosterone, and renin concentrations were similar in subjects with a high or low FRI. The very highest FRI values (≥ 5.0, N = 61) were always accompanied by albuminuria. CONCLUSION: Fluid retention consistent with moderate dehydration is common in healthy staff working in a Swedish hospital.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5072703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50727032016-10-27 Urinary Analysis of Fluid Retention in the General Population: A Cross-Sectional Study Hahn, Robert G. Grankvist, Nina Krizhanovskii, Camilla PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Renal conservation (retention) of fluid might affect the outcome of hospital care and can be indicated by increased urinary concentrations of metabolic waste products. We obtained a reference material for further studies by exploring the prevalence of fluid retention in a healthy population. METHODS: Spot urine sampling was performed in 300 healthy hospital workers. A previously validated algorithm summarized the urine-specific gravity, osmolality, creatinine, and color to a fluid retention index (FRI), where 4.0 is the cut-off for fluid retention consistent with dehydration. In 50 of the volunteers, we also studied the relationships between FRI, plasma osmolality, and water-retaining hormones. RESULTS: The cut-off for fluid retention (FRI ≥ 4.0) was reached by 38% of the population. No correlation was found between the FRI and the time of the day of urine sample collection, and the FRI was only marginally correlated with the time period spent without fluid intake. Volunteers with fluid retention were younger, generally men, and more often had albuminuria (88% vs. 34%, P < 0.001). Plasma osmolality and plasma sodium were somewhat higher in those with a high FRI (mean 294.8 vs. 293.4 mosmol/kg and 140.3 vs. 139.9 mmol/l). Plasma vasopressin was consistently below the limit of detection, and the plasma cortisol, aldosterone, and renin concentrations were similar in subjects with a high or low FRI. The very highest FRI values (≥ 5.0, N = 61) were always accompanied by albuminuria. CONCLUSION: Fluid retention consistent with moderate dehydration is common in healthy staff working in a Swedish hospital. Public Library of Science 2016-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5072703/ /pubmed/27764121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164152 Text en © 2016 Hahn et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hahn, Robert G.
Grankvist, Nina
Krizhanovskii, Camilla
Urinary Analysis of Fluid Retention in the General Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
title Urinary Analysis of Fluid Retention in the General Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Urinary Analysis of Fluid Retention in the General Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Urinary Analysis of Fluid Retention in the General Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Urinary Analysis of Fluid Retention in the General Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Urinary Analysis of Fluid Retention in the General Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort urinary analysis of fluid retention in the general population: a cross-sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27764121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164152
work_keys_str_mv AT hahnrobertg urinaryanalysisoffluidretentioninthegeneralpopulationacrosssectionalstudy
AT grankvistnina urinaryanalysisoffluidretentioninthegeneralpopulationacrosssectionalstudy
AT krizhanovskiicamilla urinaryanalysisoffluidretentioninthegeneralpopulationacrosssectionalstudy