Cargando…

A Bayesian micro-simulation to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of interventions for mastitis control during the dry period in UK dairy herds

Importance of the dry period with respect to mastitis control is now well established although the precise interventions that reduce the risk of acquiring intramammary infections during this time are not clearly understood. There are very few intervention studies that have measured the clinical effi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Down, P.M., Bradley, A.J., Breen, J.E., Browne, W.J., Kypraios, T., Green, M.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Scientific Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27720028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.09.012
_version_ 1782461499353071616
author Down, P.M.
Bradley, A.J.
Breen, J.E.
Browne, W.J.
Kypraios, T.
Green, M.J.
author_facet Down, P.M.
Bradley, A.J.
Breen, J.E.
Browne, W.J.
Kypraios, T.
Green, M.J.
author_sort Down, P.M.
collection PubMed
description Importance of the dry period with respect to mastitis control is now well established although the precise interventions that reduce the risk of acquiring intramammary infections during this time are not clearly understood. There are very few intervention studies that have measured the clinical efficacy of specific mastitis interventions within a cost-effectiveness framework so there remains a large degree of uncertainty about the impact of a specific intervention and its costeffectiveness. The aim of this study was to use a Bayesian framework to investigate the cost-effectiveness of mastitis controls during the dry period. Data were assimilated from 77 UK dairy farms that participated in a British national mastitis control programme during 2009–2012 in which the majority of intramammary infections were acquired during the dry period. The data consisted of clinical mastitis (CM) and somatic cell count (SCC) records, herd management practices and details of interventions that were implemented by the farmer as part of the control plan. The outcomes used to measure the effectiveness of the interventions were i) changes in the incidence rate of clinical mastitis during the first 30 days after calving and ii) the rate at which cows gained new infections during the dry period (measured by SCC changes across the dry period from <200,000 cells/ml to >200,000 cells/ml). A Bayesian one-step microsimulation model was constructed such that posterior predictions from the model incorporated uncertainty in all parameters. The incremental net benefit was calculated across 10,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo iterations, to estimate the cost-benefit (and associated uncertainty) of each mastitis intervention. Interventions identified as being cost-effective in most circumstances included selecting dry-cow therapy at the cow level, dry-cow rations formulated by a qualified nutritionist, use of individual calving pens, first milking cows within 24 h of calving and spreading bedding evenly in dry-cow yards. The results of this study highlighted the efficacy of specific mastitis interventions in UK conditions which, when incorporated into a costeffectiveness framework, can be used to optimize decision making in mastitis control. This intervention study provides an example of how an intuitive and clinically useful Bayesian approach can be used to form the basis of an on-farm decision support tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5073076
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier Scientific Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-50730762016-10-25 A Bayesian micro-simulation to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of interventions for mastitis control during the dry period in UK dairy herds Down, P.M. Bradley, A.J. Breen, J.E. Browne, W.J. Kypraios, T. Green, M.J. Prev Vet Med Article Importance of the dry period with respect to mastitis control is now well established although the precise interventions that reduce the risk of acquiring intramammary infections during this time are not clearly understood. There are very few intervention studies that have measured the clinical efficacy of specific mastitis interventions within a cost-effectiveness framework so there remains a large degree of uncertainty about the impact of a specific intervention and its costeffectiveness. The aim of this study was to use a Bayesian framework to investigate the cost-effectiveness of mastitis controls during the dry period. Data were assimilated from 77 UK dairy farms that participated in a British national mastitis control programme during 2009–2012 in which the majority of intramammary infections were acquired during the dry period. The data consisted of clinical mastitis (CM) and somatic cell count (SCC) records, herd management practices and details of interventions that were implemented by the farmer as part of the control plan. The outcomes used to measure the effectiveness of the interventions were i) changes in the incidence rate of clinical mastitis during the first 30 days after calving and ii) the rate at which cows gained new infections during the dry period (measured by SCC changes across the dry period from <200,000 cells/ml to >200,000 cells/ml). A Bayesian one-step microsimulation model was constructed such that posterior predictions from the model incorporated uncertainty in all parameters. The incremental net benefit was calculated across 10,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo iterations, to estimate the cost-benefit (and associated uncertainty) of each mastitis intervention. Interventions identified as being cost-effective in most circumstances included selecting dry-cow therapy at the cow level, dry-cow rations formulated by a qualified nutritionist, use of individual calving pens, first milking cows within 24 h of calving and spreading bedding evenly in dry-cow yards. The results of this study highlighted the efficacy of specific mastitis interventions in UK conditions which, when incorporated into a costeffectiveness framework, can be used to optimize decision making in mastitis control. This intervention study provides an example of how an intuitive and clinically useful Bayesian approach can be used to form the basis of an on-farm decision support tool. Elsevier Scientific Publishing 2016-10-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5073076/ /pubmed/27720028 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.09.012 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Down, P.M.
Bradley, A.J.
Breen, J.E.
Browne, W.J.
Kypraios, T.
Green, M.J.
A Bayesian micro-simulation to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of interventions for mastitis control during the dry period in UK dairy herds
title A Bayesian micro-simulation to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of interventions for mastitis control during the dry period in UK dairy herds
title_full A Bayesian micro-simulation to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of interventions for mastitis control during the dry period in UK dairy herds
title_fullStr A Bayesian micro-simulation to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of interventions for mastitis control during the dry period in UK dairy herds
title_full_unstemmed A Bayesian micro-simulation to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of interventions for mastitis control during the dry period in UK dairy herds
title_short A Bayesian micro-simulation to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of interventions for mastitis control during the dry period in UK dairy herds
title_sort bayesian micro-simulation to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of interventions for mastitis control during the dry period in uk dairy herds
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5073076/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27720028
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.09.012
work_keys_str_mv AT downpm abayesianmicrosimulationtoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofinterventionsformastitiscontrolduringthedryperiodinukdairyherds
AT bradleyaj abayesianmicrosimulationtoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofinterventionsformastitiscontrolduringthedryperiodinukdairyherds
AT breenje abayesianmicrosimulationtoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofinterventionsformastitiscontrolduringthedryperiodinukdairyherds
AT brownewj abayesianmicrosimulationtoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofinterventionsformastitiscontrolduringthedryperiodinukdairyherds
AT kypraiost abayesianmicrosimulationtoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofinterventionsformastitiscontrolduringthedryperiodinukdairyherds
AT greenmj abayesianmicrosimulationtoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofinterventionsformastitiscontrolduringthedryperiodinukdairyherds
AT downpm bayesianmicrosimulationtoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofinterventionsformastitiscontrolduringthedryperiodinukdairyherds
AT bradleyaj bayesianmicrosimulationtoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofinterventionsformastitiscontrolduringthedryperiodinukdairyherds
AT breenje bayesianmicrosimulationtoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofinterventionsformastitiscontrolduringthedryperiodinukdairyherds
AT brownewj bayesianmicrosimulationtoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofinterventionsformastitiscontrolduringthedryperiodinukdairyherds
AT kypraiost bayesianmicrosimulationtoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofinterventionsformastitiscontrolduringthedryperiodinukdairyherds
AT greenmj bayesianmicrosimulationtoevaluatethecosteffectivenessofinterventionsformastitiscontrolduringthedryperiodinukdairyherds